Ex-Diplomat Slams US Venezuela Op as "Abduction," Cites Oil Motive

Former Indian diplomat Dilip Sinha has sharply criticized the US operation in Venezuela that detained Nicolas Maduro, calling it an "abduction" and a violation of international law due to a lack of US jurisdiction. He suggested the underlying motive is the United States' interest in Venezuela's substantial oil reserves. Sinha noted that while narcotics trafficking is a regional issue, Venezuela is not frequently cited in such cases, and Maduro had previously signaled a willingness to cooperate with Washington. The remarks follow a US military operation that transferred Maduro to New York to face charges including narco-terrorism, amid broader US military activity and political statements about reclaiming oil interests.

Key Points: US Venezuela Action an "Abduction," Violates Law: Ex-Diplomat

  • US lacks jurisdiction in Venezuela
  • Action violates international law
  • Motive linked to oil reserves
  • Maduro had offered cooperation
  • Operation followed US military strikes
3 min read

"This is not technically an arrest, but an abduction": Former diplomat Dilip Sinha on US action in Venezuela

Former UN diplomat Dilip Sinha condemns US capture of Nicolas Maduro as illegal abduction driven by Venezuela's oil, not jurisdiction.

"This is not technically an arrest, but an abduction. - Dilip Sinha"

New Delhi, January 5

Former Indian permanent representative to the United Nations in Geneva, Dilip Sinha, on Monday criticised the US action in Venezuela, terming it a violation of international law and questioning Washington's legal authority to carry out such an operation.

Speaking to ANI, Sinha said, "This is not technically an arrest, but an abduction. The US doesn't have jurisdiction in Venezuela. This is an abduction where a head of state has been kidnapped and taken to the US. It is a violation of international law."

Expanding on his criticism, Sinha questioned the underlying motive behind the action, linking it to Venezuela's natural resources. "The reason he has settled on is taking claim to the oil reserves of Venezuela," Sinha said.

Placing the issue in a broader regional context, Sinha pointed out that while narcotics trafficking is a serious concern across Latin America, Venezuela is not frequently cited in such cases. "Because, while there is a lot of narco-terrorism from Latin America, in which the US is also implicated, there are not many reports from Venezuela. There are other countries in Latin America which have been involved in this and have been accused of cocaine smuggling," he said.

Referring to earlier diplomatic overtures, Sinha said that Caracas had signalled willingness to engage with Washington. "President Maduro had offered to cooperate with the US and have talks to address its problems," he said.

Against this backdrop, Sinha described the US decision as difficult to understand. "So it's very strange that President Trump should have gone ahead and abducted him," he added.

The remarks come after US forces carried out a pre-dawn operation inside Venezuela, detaining deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro along with his wife, Cilia Flores, and transferring them to a US naval vessel before flying them to New York, the Trump administration has stated.

According to US authorities, deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro is expected to face multiple charges, including narco-terrorism, drug trafficking and weapons-related offences.

The operation followed months of intensified US military activity in the region. Since September, Washington has launched dozens of strikes against vessels it claims were involved in drug trafficking linked to Venezuela. These operations reportedly resulted in more than 115 deaths, prompting legal experts to raise concerns over potential violations of international law.

US legal action against deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro dates back to President Donald Trump's first term. A superseding indictment unsealed on Saturday added fresh allegations of narco-terrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said on social media that Maduro and others "will soon face the full wrath of American justice on American soil in American courts".

However, President Trump's own remarks introduced a broader political dimension to the operation. Speaking at a press conference on Saturday, he went beyond a law enforcement justification, stating that the United States would "run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition," while also referring to reclaiming American oil interests in Venezuela.

As deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro awaits arraignment in a federal court in New York, the legal proceedings ahead are expected to draw as much attention as the military operation that led to his capture.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While the method is questionable, let's not forget Maduro's regime has caused immense suffering to Venezuelans. The charges are serious. Sometimes, extraordinary situations require extraordinary measures. Hope this leads to stability for the Venezuelan people.
V
Vikram M
Oil reserves. That's the real headline here. Trump saying they will "run the country" and "reclaim American oil interests" says it all. This is 21st-century colonialism. Reminds us why India must be self-reliant in energy.
P
Priya S
Very complex issue. As an Indian, I believe in sovereignty. But I also believe in holding leaders accountable for crimes. The US should have worked through the UN or with regional bodies. This unilateral action weakens global institutions we all depend on.
R
Rohit P
Sinha sir has nailed it. "Abduction" is the correct word. Imagine if another country's special forces landed in Texas and took a former US president? The hypocrisy is staggering. The Global South is always on the receiving end of these "rules-based orders".
M
Michael C
Respectfully, I have to disagree with the former diplomat's characterization. The US has jurisdiction for crimes committed against its own laws, especially narco-terrorism that floods American streets. This was a lawful capture of a fugitive, not an abduction of a sitting head of state.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50