Telangana Congress Urges Fair Voter List Revision, Warns Against Rush

The Telangana Congress has urged the Chief Electoral Officer not to rush the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists. Party president Mahesh Kumar Goud claimed the SIR led to a change of government in West Bengal. The delegation demanded the process be conducted over 1.5-2 years instead of 2-3 months. They also called for a 3-month notice period and proper verification to ensure fairness.

Key Points: Congress Urges Fair SIR Process in Telangana

  • Congress delegation meets Telangana CEO over SIR process
  • Cites West Bengal election outcome as cautionary example
  • Demands 1.5-2 year timeline for revision
  • Requests extended 3-month notice period for voters
3 min read

Telangana Congress urges CEO not to rush SIR process​

Telangana Congress urges CEO to conduct Special Intensive Revision (SIR) fairly, citing West Bengal experience. Party demands 1.5-2 year timeline.

"The party which should have won the election suffered defeat because of the Special Intensive Revision. - Mahesh Kumar Goud"

Hyderabad, May 15

Claiming that the Special Intensive Revision led to a change of government in West Bengal, Telangana Congress president Mahesh Kumar Goud on Friday urged the state Chief Electoral Officer not to carry out the process in a hurry.​

A delegation of Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee leaders led by Mahesh Kumar Goud called on Chief Electoral Officer C. Sudharshan Reddy and submitted a memorandum, urging him to conduct the Special Intensive Revision in a fair and impartial manner.​

Later, the Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee chief told the media that the change of government in West Bengal occurred due to the Special Intensive Revision.​

"The party which should have won the election suffered defeat because of the Special Intensive Revision," he said.​

Stating that no election is scheduled in Telangana for the next two years, he said there was no need to rush the Special Intensive Revision.​

He suggested that the process be conducted over the next one-and-a-half years.​

Goud pointed out that the Census is currently being conducted.​

He said that if the Special Intensive Revision is conducted alongside the Census, it will put pressure on the staff.​

He demanded that the period for responding to any notice issued under the Special Intensive Revision should be extended to three months.​

He also suggested that the booth-level officer should visit every house three to four times for verification.​

The delegation included Minister Ponnam Prabhakar, Members of Parliament Anil Kumar Yadav and Chamala Kiran Kumar Reddy.​

The Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee stated in its representation that the Special Intensive Revision was conducted carelessly immediately before elections in several states, resulting in confusion, anxiety, and distrust among citizens.​

It made various suggestions for conducting the process in Telangana in a fair, transparent, and impartial manner.​

In view of the increased number of voters since 2002, the Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee called for conducting the process meticulously and in a phased manner.​

The Congress party demanded that, in light of experiences in other states, the Special Intensive Revision process ought not to be rushed or concluded within 2 to 3 months.​

It suggested a timeline of 1.5 to 2 years, noting that adequate time would facilitate the resolution of objections, reduce public apprehension, and lessen administrative pressure.​

The Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee said that before deleting the name of any voter, a minimum of 7 days' written notice must be served.​

Instances from other states indicate that deletions have been made without proper notice, sometimes based on hearsay or unverified home visits, it said.​

In Telangana, notices should be served personally or through a documented process in the presence of witnesses.​

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Arjun K
Fair point though - doing SIR alongside Census will definitely overburden the staff. Even basic verification becomes impossible when you're rushing. Better to take 1.5-2 years as suggested and ensure accuracy rather than having thousands of genuine voters disenfranchised.
R
Rahul R
Yaar, both sides have valid concerns. Congress wants to protect their voters, EC wants to clean the rolls. But deleting names without proper notice is absolutely wrong - that happened in Andhra Pradesh last time and so many people couldn't vote. Seven days written notice is basic right.
S
Shreya B
Exactly! When they did SIR in Maharashtra before elections, my grandmother's name was removed just because she was temporarily staying with us in Hyderabad. Took 3 months to get it restored. If they give proper time, these problems can be avoided. Congress is right to ask for 3 months notice period.
V
Vikram M
But wasn't Congress itself in power in West Bengal for decades? Now they're blaming SIR for their loss? Hypocrisy at its peak. They just want to delay because they know many of their supporters are duplicate entries from the old voters lists. Clean electoral rolls = free and fair elections.
K
Kavya N
Actually makes sense from an administrative perspective. Why rush when there's no election for 2 years? Better to do it properly in phases. But the 3-4 home visits demand seems excessive - even 2 visits should be enough if done genuinely. EC should find middle ground.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50