Iran Submits 14-Point Counter-Proposal to US via Pakistan to End Conflict

Iran has submitted a 14-point counter-proposal to the United States via a Pakistani intermediary, seeking to end regional conflict. The proposal demands termination of war within 30 days, US military withdrawal from the region, and removal of sanctions. US President Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the offer, warning that military options remain on the table. The negotiations occur during a fragile ceasefire that has been in place since early April.

Key Points: Iran Sends 14-Point Counter-Proposal to US via Pakistan

  • Iran submits 14-point counter-proposal to US via Pakistani intermediary
  • Proposal demands ending war on all fronts, including Lebanon
  • Tehran insists on 30-day resolution timeline vs US two-month ceasefire
  • Iran seeks guarantees against aggression, US withdrawal, sanctions removal, and asset release
3 min read

Tehran submits 14-point counter-proposal to US through Pakistani intermediary to end regional conflict

Iran submits a 14-point counter-proposal to the US via Pakistan, demanding war termination within 30 days, sanctions removal, and asset release.

"Now the ball is in the United States' court to choose either the path of diplomacy or continuation of a confrontational approach. - Kazem Gharibabadi"

Tehran, May 3

A 14-point response to a proposal from the United States has been submitted by Tehran, state media outlet Tasnim news agency reported on Saturday.

The Iranian proposal, which was reportedly delivered via a Pakistani intermediary, calls for "ending the war on all fronts, including Lebanon," according to Tasnim.

While the US reportedly proposed a two-month ceasefire, Tasnim noted that Tehran maintains "that the issues should be resolved within 30 days" and insists that diplomatic efforts must prioritise the "termination of the war" as opposed to simply extending a ceasefire.

The Iranian document follows a nine-point US proposal and covers various topics, including guarantees against military aggression and the withdrawal of US military forces from the region surrounding Iran.

The response further stipulates the release of frozen Iranian assets, the removal of sanctions, and the introduction of a "new mechanism for the Strait of Hormuz."

Iran's state broadcaster, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who stated that the proposal was "aimed at the permanent end" of the conflict.

"Now the ball is in the United States' court to choose either the path of diplomacy or continuation of a confrontational approach," Gharibabadi said.

Although Iranian officials have refrained from publicly discussing the specific details of the response, US President Donald Trump stated on Saturday that he would soon review the plan.

However, he remarked that he "can't imagine that it would be acceptable."

Expressing his dissatisfaction with the offer, the US President warned that military options continue to remain on the table.

"They want to make a deal, but I'm not satisfied with it," Trump told reporters. "They've made strides, but I'm not sure if they ever get there... They're asking for things that I can't agree to."

The US President further noted that he had received briefings regarding potential military action. "Do we want to go and just blast the hell out of them... or do we want to try and make a deal? Those are the options," he said.

He added that while he would prefer "on a human basis" to avoid bombing, he insisted that Iran must be prevented from obtaining nuclear weapons.

Trump indicated that significant disagreements remain, describing the negotiations as complicated and suggesting that Iranian leaders were "not getting along with each other."

Reports suggest that Washington is demanding firm commitments regarding Iran's nuclear programme at the start of the process. Conversely, Tehran is reportedly seeking a sequence that prioritises the easing of military and economic pressure.

This latest proposal emerges during a fragile ceasefire that has been maintained since early April. The truce followed a period of intense conflict that began on February 28, initiated by US and Israeli strikes against Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Trump's "blast the hell out of them" comment is alarming. As someone who values diplomacy, I'm glad India has always maintained a balanced approach with Iran - we need energy partnerships but also strategic ties with the US. This whole war mentality is exhausting for the entire region.
R
Rohit P
30 days instead of 2 months ceasefire? Iran is clearly in a hurry. But those demands about frozen assets and removing sanctions - America will never agree to that upfront. They want nuclear commitments first. It's like our own negotiations with the US on trade deals, always a chicken-and-egg situation.
J
James A
Trump saying he "can't imagine it would be acceptable" while hinting at bombing - that's typical brinkmanship. But as a Westerner living in India for work, I see how this affects everyone here. The Strait of Hormuz proposal is key - that's the lifeline for oil to Asia. Hope cooler heads prevail.
S
Siddharth J
'Ball is in US court' but Trump is already rejecting it. Classic pattern - the US wants terms that cripple Iran permanently, Iran wants relief from sanctions first. Meanwhile, countries like India get caught in the crossfire. We've been importing Iranian oil despite US pressure, and this instability hurts our energy planning big time.
M
Meera T
One thing I appreciate - Iran at least submitted a detailed counter-proposal rather than just walking away. But Trump's 'options' comment about bombing vs deal-making is terrifying. Countries like ours that value strategic autonomy must push for de-escalation. India has good relations with both Iran and the US, we should use that.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50