Will Jacks: England Don't Need Perfect Game to Win T20 World Cup

England all-rounder Will Jacks emphasized that results, not perfection, are what matter after his team qualified for the T20 World Cup semi-finals. Jacks, who earned his fourth Player-of-the-Match award, highlighted a crucial partnership with Rehan Ahmed to chase down 160 against New Zealand. He admitted to nerves but said a decisive six from Ahmed shifted the momentum and belief. England now heads to Mumbai for the semi-final, prepared to face either India or West Indies.

Key Points: Jacks on England's T20 WC Mindset: Results Over Perfection

  • England qualified for semi-finals
  • Jacks won fourth Player-of-the-Match award
  • Key partnership with Rehan Ahmed sealed win
  • Team prepared for India or West Indies next
  • Focus on key moments over perfection
4 min read

T20 WC: We do not really care about the perfect game, says Will Jacks

England's Will Jacks says winning matters more than a perfect game after sealing a T20 World Cup semi-final berth with a thrilling win over New Zealand.

"We've won six out of seven games... no one really cares (about the perfect game). - Will Jacks"

Colombo, Feb 28

All-rounder Will Jacks believes England doesn't need a "perfect game" to lift the 2026 ICC Men's T20 World Cup title. Having sealed a semi-final berth with a thrilling last-over win over New Zealand in Colombo - his fourth Player-of-the-Match award of the tournament - Jacks made it clear that results, not perfection, were what mattered.

"We've won six out of seven games and we've qualified for a semi-final. At the end of the day, no one really cares (about the perfect game). We obviously want to play well in there, but we're not gutted that we haven't played the perfect game because we're winning. And that's T20 cricket, that's professional sport. It's also incredibly hard to do that.

"You're playing against a very strong side who have prepared as well as you, and they know what they're trying to do and they're also trying to play the perfect game. So the chances of that happening are very slim. What we've done well is, in the key moments, we've kept a calm and clear head and we've managed to negotiate those well."

Under Harry Brook's leadership, they have repeatedly found themselves in tricky positions, only for someone to step up. Against New Zealand, chasing 160, the crisis point arrived again: 43 required from the final three overs when Rehan Ahmed joined Jacks at the crease. What followed was a decisive shift in momentum built on clarity and courage, as England romped home with three balls to spare.

Yet Jacks admitted the nerves were real, especially after watching Sri Lanka falter against New Zealand's spinners on the same surface at the R. Premadasa Stadium.

"I was nervous. I knew that was a big task. We've seen the Sri Lanka game two nights ago on this pitch and how well New Zealand were bowling, and I watched how our batters were finding it having bowled on it myself. I knew that was a lot of runs. So I knew we needed to do something special."

The turning point came in the 18th over when Rehan charged Glenn Phillips and launched him for six off the second ball. Twenty-two runs flowed from the over.

"That ball that Rehan hit, a six on the second ball, that gave me energy as well. And I thought, 'right, we've got a chance here'. And then obviously I finished the over 6, 4, 4, and, we were on. I think small moments like that [are] so important and not just the runs but the way it happens, hitting a big six and really showing the bowler that you're on here and we believe that we can win this is, is really crucial and from that moment I think the mindset changed."

England now head to Mumbai for the second semi-final at the Wankhede Stadium, where they will likely face either defending champions India or West Indies - the latter having beaten them earlier at the same venue.

"It would be massive, yeah," Jacks said. "Everyone knows about India and the storyline that that brings. It could also be the West Indies and they've beaten us in Mumbai, so we know how tricky that's going to be. We'll be watching their game Sunday and we'll see the outcome. We'll be prepared and I think we'll go into it with optimism and excitement."

Brook, too, was unfazed by the prospect. "We're not bothered," he said after the New Zealand win. "We've just got to go out there and whoever we're facing, they're going to be a tough opponent anyway.

"We've already played against West Indies at the Wankhede already, so a little bit of experience there. It's nice to go back to a ground that we've already played on as well. Both sides are very strong, very powerful teams and we've just got to go out there and try and do the little things well again."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As an Indian fan, I respect their confidence, but this mindset feels a bit arrogant? Cricket is about striving for excellence, not just scraping through. Hope Team India teaches them a lesson in the semis about what a "perfect" performance looks like! 💪
A
Aman W
Honestly, this is smart cricket. In a tournament, points table doesn't show how you won, just that you did. England are peaking at the right time. But Wankhede is a different beast, especially against spin. Let's see if their calm heads hold up there.
S
Sarah B
That 18th over against Phillips was the game! Rehan's six changed everything. It's these small moments. Excited for the semi-final, though my heart is with India. A India vs England final would be epic for neutral fans like me living in Delhi!
V
Vikram M
They are being practical. In a pressure cooker like a World Cup, you can't play flawless cricket every time. The key is having players who stand up in crunch situations. But yaar, please don't let it be a repeat of 2022! We need that cup at home.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, I disagree with the core idea. As fans, we *do* care about the perfect game! We remember champion teams for their dominant performances, not just close wins. This attitude might work now, but it won't build a lasting legacy.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50