Supreme Court to expunge remarks against academicians over NCERT textbook content
New Delhi, May 23
The Supreme Court has assured three academicians involved in preparing a controversial and later withdrawn sub-chapter titled "Corruption in Indian Judiciary" in a Class 8 NCERT textbook that it would delete certain adverse observations made against them, including remarks suggesting malicious intent and questioning their future professional engagement.
The Court has assured the three academicians who were behind the controversy that it will delete certain observations against the academicians which attributed malicious intent to them for preparing the said content, along with those which said that no academic institution would engage them for their services.
A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi clarified that the Court's observations in the suo motu case initiated by the Court subsequent to the inclusion of the controversial chapter in the textbook were against the controversial "content" and not against any "individual".
"We knew that the observations were harsh. We knew it affected them. In response to that, we are deleting those portions", Justice Bagchi said.
To counsels Senior Advocates Shyam Divan, Gopal Sankarnarayanan and J Sai Deepak, representing the academicians, requesting the Court to delete its observations that were against the academic integrity and credibility of their clients by stating that they had "zero intent" to malign the judiciary, the Court said it was never concerned about the inclusion of academic content on the Indian judiciary.
The Court clarified that what was concerning was that "corruption" in the said textbook "was highlighted as a unique feature of the judiciary".
The Court also asked the academicians to apply sobriety when curating academic literature on the judiciary with a sense of respect for the justice delivery system and the constitutional scheme.
The Court said that there should be a balanced approach in pedagogical content on such subjects, which was completely missing.
"Access to justice through legal aid, the role of judges in legal services and legal aid were completely ignored," Justice Bagchi said.
After a brief hearing, the Court assured the academicians that it would delete the observations, which it acknowledged were a bit harsh.
— ANI
Reader Comments
The Court is right to be concerned about how corruption was portrayed as a "unique feature" of Indian judiciary. That's not balanced at all. But threatening academicians' careers? Bit much. We need critical thinking in education, but also context. Glad they're walking back those personal remarks. Classic Indian legal system - drama and then correction.
This is what happens when you have textbook content that's not vetted properly. But also, the Court's initial reaction was too harsh. Academicians need to be careful, but institutions should not be muzzled. The "sobriety" advice to academics is patronizing though - we need debates, not censorship. Overall, a messy situation handled somewhat maturely now.
Good that Court is deleting those strong observations. But honestly, academicians should have known better - calling corruption a "unique feature" of ANY institution is bad pedagogy. Three cheers for balanced content! Let's teach our kids about judicial strengths like legal aid too. The Court's point about access to justice being ignored is valid. 🇮🇳
I'm glad the Court recognized its remarks were harsh. Academic freedom is important, but so is respect for institutions. The textbook chapter was withdrawn for a reason - it was poorly worded. However, threatening people's careers? Not okay. Balanced approach needed: teach kids about both strengths and weaknesses of our system. Hope this sets a good precedent.
Typical Indian overreaction from both sides. Court initially went overboard, now backtracks. Academicians should have been more careful. But let's be real - our judiciary
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.