Sun, 1 Nov 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jul 22, 2026 · 17:45
Uttar Pradesh News Updated Jul 22, 2026

Iqbal Ansari Backs Supreme Court Directives in Ram Mandir Donation Case

Iqbal Ansari, a former litigant in the Babri Masjid case, has backed the Supreme Court's directives in the Ram Mandir donation embezzlement case, stating that the apex court's rulings are the law of the land. The Supreme Court recently suggested reconstituting the Special Investigation Team probing the case, with a preference for a senior IPS officer to lead the investigation. Mahant Sitaram Das has called for stronger religious representation within the Ram Mandir Trust to prevent future lapses, while Mahant Raju Das expressed faith in the Trust's decision-making. The SIT's preliminary report has revealed around 70 suspicious incidents captured on CCTV, highlighting systemic lapses in donation handling.

"Supreme Court directives are the law of the land": Iqbal Ansari backs apex court directives in Ram Mandir donation case probe

Ayodhya, July 22

Following the Supreme Court's recent suggestion to reconstitute the Special Investigation Team probing the Ram Mandir donation embezzlement case, Iqbal Ansari, a former litigant in the Babri Masjid case, stated on Wednesday that the apex court's directives are the law of the land.

Speaking to ANI, Ansari emphasised that people have consistently respected and will continue to abide by the Supreme Court's rulings regarding the Ram Temple.

"The rules of the Supreme Court are the law of our land--whatever the Supreme Court says, people have been following and will continue to follow. The issue here pertains to the Ram Temple. An SIT investigation was conducted, and the Supreme Court has ordered a re-investigation. Everyone is respecting this decision, including the residents of Ayodhya and the devotees of Lord Ram," Ansari said.

"It is Ayodhya's tradition that whatever happens here happens for the good, as this is a holy city where people of all castes hold faith. Whatever rules and laws the Supreme Court has established, and whatever it has directed, people are respecting completely," he added.

Speaking on the Ram Mandir Trust meeting, Mahant Sitaram Das advocated for stronger religious representation within the Trust to prevent future lapses.

"There is a meeting of Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra tomorrow... I will definitely request the officials that I am hearing that new appointments are going to be made in it. In such new appointments, saints should be included so that traditional worship is maintained smoothly, such irregularities do not happen again, and the rest will be known after tomorrow's meeting," Mahant Sitaram Das said.

Echoing faith in the Trust's decision-making, Hanuman Garhi temple priest Mahant Raju Das stated that any appointment should safeguard the temple's sanctity.

"The decision the Trust takes will be accepted, and the Trust will appoint only such a person who will always protect the dignity and respect of the Ram Temple and Sanatan Dharma... The Trust will decide who will be the member," Mahant Raju Das said.

The meeting comes against the backdrop of an ongoing probe into the alleged embezzlement of Ram Mandir donations.

While a three-member Special Investigation Team (SIT) is already investigating the matter, the Supreme Court on Monday asked the Uttar Pradesh government to seek instructions on reconstituting the SIT. The Court indicated a preference for the probe to be headed by a senior IPS officer experienced in handling such financial investigations.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana, was hearing a batch of petitions seeking judicial intervention into the alleged misappropriation of cash donations, gold, and other valuables received by the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, which manages the temple.

Appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the Court that, in compliance with its earlier directions, the state had filed a status report. He stated that the investigation was progressing and eight people had been arrested so far. Mehta further submitted that an SIT had already been constituted to examine whether cognizable offenses were committed.

After perusing the status report, the bench questioned the SIT's current composition and asked the state to consider placing the investigation under the leadership of a senior IPS officer.

The SIT probing the donation row stated that, prima facie, around 70 suspicious incidents were captured on CCTV between April 27 and June 5. In the video footage, counting staff were reportedly seen concealing wads of cash.

The preliminary report highlights several systemic lapses, noting that a lack of entry and exit frisking, poor control over personal belongings, and the practice of counting cash from multiple donation boxes together created conditions that made the crime possible.

The report also mentions the recovery of approximately Rs 78.94 lakh from several employees prior to the formal investigation, as well as an additional Rs 2.25 lakh allegedly recovered on June 4 from a bathroom adjacent to the counting room.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Vikram M

Finally, some accountability! 🙏 It's shocking that such a huge amount of donations could be embezzled. The SIT should be proactive and ensure that all those involved, irrespective of their status, are punished. This is a slap on the face of every devotee who donated with faith.

Priya S

While I respect the Supreme Court's decision, I can't help but wonder why such basic checks like frisking and CCTV monitoring weren't in place from the beginning. It's like we wait for a scandal to happen before fixing things. The temple trust needs better governance, not just more saints.

Rohit P

Mahant Sitaram Das is right—we need more saints in the trust. But let's not forget that some of these saints themselves have been involved in controversies. What we need is a mix of spiritual leaders and financial experts who can ensure transparency. Only then will the temple's dignity be protected. 🛕

Arjun K

These scams are why some people lose faith in our institutions. I'm not saying everyone is corrupt, but when you have millions of rupees in donations coming in, you need proper oversight. The Supreme Court's intervention is a good step, but I hope the UP government appoints a truly independent officer, not someone with political connections.

Kavya N

I appreciate that the Supreme Court is taking this seriously. 70 suspicious incidents in just a few weeks? That's not a coincidence. It's a systemic failure. The temple trust should implement digital donations and real-time tracking. We are in 2025—there's no

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked