Ian Bishop: Sufficient Evidence for Patidar 'Not Out' in GT-RCB Clash

Ian Bishop believes there was sufficient evidence for Rajat Patidar to be not out after Jason Holder's controversial catch. The RCB camp, led by Virat Kohli, protested that the ball touched the grass as Holder slid. Bishop questioned whether Holder had full control of the ball and body under MCC laws. Abhinav Mukund also argued the catch was not out as the ball clearly touched the ground.

Key Points: Bishop on Holder's Catch: Patidar Should Be Not Out

  • Ian Bishop questions Holder's catch control
  • Ball may have touched grass during slide
  • RCB camp protested, led by Virat Kohli
  • GT won, RCB stay second in table
4 min read

"Sufficient evidence for not out": Bishop on Holder's catch to dismiss Patidar during GT-RCB's IPL clash

Ian Bishop says there was sufficient evidence for Rajat Patidar to be not out after Jason Holder's controversial catch during GT-RCB IPL match.

"I think there was sufficient evidence in my mind for that to be not out. - Ian Bishop"

Ahmedabad, May 1

Former West Indies cricketer Ian Bishop has pointed out that there was sufficient evidence for Rajat Patidar to be adjudged as "not out" after the controversial catch to dismiss Royal Challengers Bengaluru skipper by Gujarat Titans all-rounder Jason Holder.

RCB displayed their first genuinely poor performance with the bat this season, not able to capitalise on the surge of momentum produced by Virat Kohli's five successive boundaries against pacer Kagiso Rabada in the powerplay.

A big point of debate was the catch to dismiss Patidar, with the RCB camp, led by Virat, protesting that as the all-rounder held on to the ball while sliding on the turf, the ball had touched the grass as Holder got up. The whole camp looked unhappy with Patidar's dismissal and RCB collapsed from 79/3 at this point to 96/6.

Speaking during the ESPNCricinfo 'TimeOut', Bishop said that the footage of Holder's hand sliding through the turf deserved a second look and questioned if it was truly determined that the all-rounder had his fingers under the ball while getting up.

"My debate on it would be: Jason Holder, first, he caught the ball, no problems with that. And then with the sliding of the hand initially, that deserved a second look. And then you talk about control of the ball, but also control of the body. So when you are looking to get yourself up having slid along the ground, are they determining that his fingers was under the ball?," he said.

Ian said that the back of Holder's catching hand was to the sky, and the ball was facing the grass.

"And so there was to me doubt there about ball and ground, because you are not in control of your body until you stop sliding and you stand up if you are going to do that. So out or not out? "I think there was sufficient evidence in my mind for that to be [not out]," Bishop added.

As per MCC's Laws of Cricket, the catch is considered fair if the fielder "has complete control over the ball and their own movement before the ball touches the ground". The catch, as per the rules, would be valid, but former Indian cricketer Abhinav Mukund disagrees as well, since the ball touched the ground.

"To me, that is not out because the ball should not touch the ground," he said. "If the ball touches the ground, then it clearly is not out. And there are multiple ways to get up. You are an extremely fit international athlete. You do not need your hands or a ball to get up. So that is where I stand in the whole matter," he added.

"I know there's a lot of ambiguity in the law itself. But if the ball touches the ground, to me it is not out. And what I saw, which I am sure the TV umpire did see, and a lot of viewers also saw, [was that] the ball touched the ground," he signed off.

About the catch, RCB pacer Bhuvneshwar Kumar, who took a valiant three-wicket-haul in loss, said during the post-match presser, "I was not there, but what I can see is that we saw that the ball touched the ground. We wanted an umpire to have a closer look at that."

Coming to the match, GT opted to bowl first. Virat Kohli (28 in 13 balls, with five fours) got RCB off to a good start, with five successive fours against Kagiso Rabada (1/44). But courtesy fine spells from Arshad Khan (3/22), Rashid Khan (2/19) and Jason Holder (2/29), RCB continued to lose wickets regularly. Devdutt Padikkal (40 in 24 balls, with five fours and two sixes) was the top-scorer as RCB posted 155 in 19.2 overs.

During the chase, quickfire knocks from skipper Shubman Gill (43 in 18 balls, with four boundaries and three sixes) and Jos Buttler (39 in 19 balls, with two fours and four sixes) aided GT's run-chase, but after losing all three top-order batters at 92, GT sank to 111/5. But Rahul Tewatia (27* in 17 balls, with four boundaries) held one end steady, taking GT to fifth spot in the table with their fifth win of the season in nine matches.

RCB meanwhile, stays at the second spot, having suffered their third loss in nine matches.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

M
Michael C
As a neutral observer from the US, this seems like another case where technology creates more confusion than clarity. If the on-field umpire gave it out and TV umpire saw 'sufficient evidence' to overturn... well, maybe we need clearer rules. But hey, GT deserved that win - Gill's 43 off 18 was 🔥
D
Deepak U
True Indian cricket fan here - this is why I love IPL drama! But seriously, Abhinav Mukund makes a valid point. If ball touches ground, it's not out. Simple as that. RCB should have challenged more aggressively. Virat's reaction said it all - he knew it was a bad decision. Still, credit to GT bowlers for pulling it back. 🏏
R
Rajesh Q
I disagree with some comments here. The law says 'complete control' - if Holder's fingers were under the ball throughout, even if ball touches grass briefly, it can still be out. Look at how many catches we've seen where fielder's hands touch ground. Consistency is key! RCB fans need to accept and move on. #IPL2025
S
Sarah B
Watching from Australia - this is exactly why DRS needs overhauling. The 'umpire's call' and 'sufficient evidence' standards are too vague. Both Bishop and Mukund have strong cases. But what impressed me was GT's fightback after being 111/5 - Tewatia's calm finish showed real character. RCB's top order needs to learn to build partnerships.
V
Vinay O
I'm a die-hard RCB fan and this stings. But let

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50