Ian Bishop Urges Sai Sudharsan to Boost Aggression After IPL Century

Former West Indies cricketer Ian Bishop has urged Gujarat Titans opener Sai Sudharsan to increase his aggression level after his breathtaking IPL century. Sudharsan scored 100 off 58 balls against Royal Challengers Bengaluru, becoming the fastest batter to reach 2,000 IPL runs. However, his knock was not enough as GT lost by five wickets in a high-scoring clash. Former South African pacer Dale Steyn praised Sudharsan's calculated and orthodox batting approach.

Key Points: Ian Bishop: Sai Sudharsan Needs More Aggression in IPL

  • Sai Sudharsan scored 100 off 58 vs RCB
  • Ian Bishop says he needs more aggression
  • Sudharsan fastest to 2,000 IPL runs
  • Dale Steyn praises his calculated batting
2 min read

Sudharsan need to step up his aggression level: Ian Bishop

Ian Bishop says GT opener Sai Sudharsan must step up aggression after his 100 off 58 vs RCB. Dale Steyn praises his calculated batting approach.

"He's one of the guys that needed to step up his aggression level. - Ian Bishop"

New Delhi, April 25

Former West Indies cricketer Ian Bishop pointed out the lack of speed in Gujarat Titans opener batter Sai Sudharsan's after his breathtaking IPL century against Royal Challengers Bengaluru and stated that he needed to tep up his aggression level in his batting approach.

Sudharsan lit up the M. Chinnaswamy Stadium with a sensational 100 off 58 and in the process etched his name in the IPL records by becoming the fastest batter to reach 2,000 runs. But it wasn't enough as GT went down fighting against RCB by five-wickets in a high-scoring clash.

Sudharsan, who was the Orange Cap winner from IPL 2025, had a patchy start to IPL 2026 as he had just one fifty-plus score before his century against RCB.

"He's one of the guys that needed to step up his aggression level. For the most part of that innings, I thought he was outstanding for a very orthodox player," Bishop said on ESPNcricinfo's TimeOut.

"I think that hundred would be very, very pleasing for him and for the GT dugout, and for the IPL as a whole, because here's another guy who gets another hundred - they've been coming in thick and fast in the last week and a half, hasn't it?"

"He certainly did his part. If we're asking other guys that should have stepped up, at least Sai Sudarshan did his part."

Meanwhile, former South African pcaer Dale Steyn was impressed with Sudharan's innings and said the opener knows exactly how and where he wants to score his runs.

"I just think he plays orthodox cricket, you know, like he plays good cricket shots; he hits the ball on merit. He takes the ball on when he has to, he makes calculated risks and it's not like he's running out there recklessly, swinging off his hip to try and score runs.

"It was similar to the way that Sanju Samson got his hundred the other night. I think it's calculated, you know, he knows exactly how and where he wants to score his runs and then he put on a show," said Steyn.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

M
Michael C
I see Bishop's point though. In T20 cricket, a 58-ball hundred is good but when you look at the context - GT needed someone to accelerate in the death overs. Sudharsan's strike rate dropped in the last few overs. That said, he's young and will learn. Steyn's analysis about calculated risks is spot on. The IPL keeps producing such talented Indian batters!
P
Priya S
Honestly, I think we Indians are too defensive about our players. Constructive criticism is good. Sudharsan is class but he can add more gears. Look at how Sanju Samson or Virat Kohli evolved their T20 game. Sai has time on his side - if he listens to experts like Bishop, he'll become more complete. And please, can we stop blaming the bowlers every time a batsman scores big? šŸ˜…
D
David E
I'm a neutral cricket fan and I think both Bishop and Steyn make valid points. Sai's innings was beautiful to watch - classical drives, good footwork. But T20 is changing. Even Kohli had to adapt. The fact that Bishop says "he certainly did his part" shows he respects Sai's effort. GT's middle-order collapse cost them more than Sai's approach. šŸ¤”
V
Vikram M
Bishop needs to understand Indian cricket context. We produce technically sound batsmen - that's our strength. Sudharsan's 100 was vintage. If every Indian batsman becomes a slogger, we'll lose our identity. I'd rather watch Sai play those elegant cover drives than blind heaves. Steyn got it right - calculated risk-taking. Let the boy enjoy his moment, it's his first IPL century! šŸ†

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50