IAEA Chief: Iran Nuclear Risks Remain Despite Military Strikes

The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog states that while recent military action has significantly set back Iran's nuclear program, core risks endure. Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium and its underlying technical capability to rebuild remain intact. The IAEA chief emphasizes that only renewed inspections can determine what infrastructure survived the conflict. He concludes that a return to diplomatic negotiations is ultimately necessary to address the unresolved issues.

Key Points: Iran Nuclear Risks Persist After Strikes, Says IAEA Chief

  • Uranium stockpile remains a major concern
  • Technical know-how cannot be bombed away
  • Inspectors needed to assess surviving infrastructure
  • Diplomacy essential for long-term solution
2 min read

Strikes hit Iran but nuclear risks remain: IAEA chief

IAEA's Rafael Grossi warns Iran's uranium stockpile and technical know-how survive recent strikes, urging renewed diplomacy and inspections.

"One cannot deny that this has really rolled back the programme considerably. - Rafael Grossi"

Washington, March 22

Notwithstanding the significant military damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure, core risks remain intact, including enriched uranium stockpiles and the country's ability to rebuild its programme according to the UN nuclear watchdog.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Rafael Grossi told the "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on CBS news in an interview aired Sunday that the ongoing conflict has "rolled back the programme considerably", but warned that key elements would survive.

"One cannot deny that this has really rolled back the programme considerably," Grossi said. However, he added that "we will still inherit a number of major issues" after the conflict ends.

Grossi pointed to Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 per cent as a major concern. "That is going to still be where it is, largely -- under the rubble," he said.

He also said some infrastructure and equipment may remain functional. "That is something that we will only be able to ascertain once our inspectors go back," he added.

The IAEA chief underlined that technical capability cannot be eliminated through military action. "You cannot unlearn what you've learned," he said, noting that Iran retains the industrial and scientific base to rebuild.

He said centrifuge technology, central to uranium enrichment, can be reconstituted. Iran now has "the most sophisticated, fast, and efficient machine that exists, and they know how to make them," he said.

Grossi stressed that the agency still has unresolved concerns. "There were many unanswered questions, many unanswered questions, many concerning facts," he said.

He called for renewed inspections and transparency. "If you don't have anything to hide? Show us," he said.

On current activity, Grossi said there is no visible rebuilding effort during the conflict. "We don't see major activity, which is logical, because there is a military campaign ongoing," he said. But he added that "a lot still has survived".

He emphasised that diplomacy will be essential going forward. "We need to go back to a negotiating table. It's going to be needed," he said.

Grossi also confirmed that diplomatic contacts had taken place before the war, but no agreement was reached. "There was a discussion, but there was no agreement," he said.

On proposals to remove enriched uranium through military action, Grossi warned of operational challenges. He described the material as "highly contaminated uranium hexafluoride at 60 per cent", making it "very difficult to handle".

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
"You cannot unlearn what you've learned." That's the most important line. The nuclear genie is out of the bottle. Strikes might delay things, but the long-term solution has to be verification and diplomacy. The international community needs to stay engaged.
A
Ananya R
As an Indian, I'm worried about the ripple effects. Any instability there affects global oil prices and our economy. Also, the stockpile of 60% enriched uranium is terrifying. Hope our diplomats are working behind the scenes. 🙏
M
Michael C
Respectfully, I think the article and the IAEA chief are downplaying the effectiveness of the strikes. A "considerable rollback" is a major achievement. It buys time for diplomacy. The focus should be on preventing rebuilding, not just lamenting that knowledge exists.
K
Karthik V
The technical details are chilling. "Highly contaminated uranium hexafluoride at 60%" - just moving that stuff is dangerous. This isn't a problem that can be solved with more bombs. Grossi's call for transparency is the only way forward. "If you don't have anything to hide? Show us." Well said.
P
Priya S
It feels like we're just kicking the can down the road. The JCPOA was flawed but it was a framework. Now what? Endless cycles of tension don't help anyone. India should advocate for peaceful resolution - it's in our neighborhood's interest. 🤝

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50