US Can Achieve Iran War Goals Without Ground Troops, Says Rubio

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated the United States can accomplish its military objectives against Iran without deploying any ground troops. This comes amid reports that Washington is considering sending thousands of additional soldiers to West Asia. Rubio outlined goals to destroy Iran's navy, air force, and missile launchers to prevent nuclear weapon acquisition. He also indicated the conflict is expected to conclude in a matter of weeks and mentioned the potential to divert weapons from Ukraine if needed.

Key Points: US Can Hit Iran Objectives Without Ground Troops: Rubio

  • Destroy Iran's military capabilities
  • No US ground troops needed
  • Conflict expected to last weeks
  • Troop deployment reports contradict statement
  • Weapons could be diverted from Ukraine
3 min read

State Secy Rubio says US can achieve its objectives "without any ground troops" in Iran

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says military goals against Iran can be met without ground forces, despite reports of troop deployments.

"We can achieve them without any ground troops - Marco Rubio"

Paris, March 28

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday said that the United States can accomplish its military objectives in the war against Iran "without any ground troops", even as Washington is considering sending additional ground troops to West Asia despite the talks with Iran amid the conflict.

Speaking to reporters following the Foreign Ministers meeting of the Group of Seven (G7) here, the US Secretary of State said that the country would destroy all military capabilities of the Islamic Republic in order to keep Tehran from acquiring any nuclear weapons.

"We're going to destroy their navy, we are going to destroy their air force, and we are going to significantly destroy their missile launchers so they can never hide behind these things to get a nuclear weapon," Rubio said.

"We are achieving all of those objectives; we are ahead of schedule on most of them, and we can achieve them without any ground troops, without any", he added.

His statement comes days after reports suggested that the US would be deploying more than 1,000 soldiers in West Asia amid the conflict.

According to CNN, citing two sources, the troops from the US Army's 82nd Airborne Division are to deploy in the coming days.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal, citing a US Department of War official, reported that Washington is considering sending an additional 10,000 ground troops to West Asia amid talks with Tehran, which is likely to include both infantry and armoured vehicles, in addition to the 82nd Airborne Division.

Rubio further indicated that the conflict is expected to be short in duration, stating that it would conclude in weeks rather than months.

"As the Department of War has consistently outlined, we are on or ahead of schedule in that operation and expect to conclude it at the appropriate time here, in a matter of weeks, not months," he said.

When asked about the possibility of reallocating military resources from Ukraine to the war-torn region, the US Secretary of State said the US "could" divert weapons from Ukraine, although no such action has been taken so far.

"It hasn't happened yet. Nothing yet has been diverted, but it could," Rubio said.

"Let me be clear, if the United States has a military need, whether it is to replenish our stocks or to fulfill some mission in the national interest of the United States, we're always going to come first," Rubio added.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
Rubio's statement about diverting weapons from Ukraine is concerning. It shows the US will always put its own interests first, even if it means leaving an ally in the lurch. A lesson for all nations about relying too much on external powers. 🇮🇳
A
Aman W
"Weeks, not months" – heard that before in Afghanistan and Iraq. The arrogance of thinking a complex region can be sorted with just air power is astounding. This will create more refugees and problems for the entire world, including India.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the US perspective on non-proliferation, the language of "destroying" another country's military is extremely aggressive. It leaves no room for dialogue. India has shown a better path with its "Strategic Autonomy" – engaging with all sides for peace.
V
Vikram M
The immediate worry is oil prices. If the Strait of Hormuz is affected, our economy takes a direct hit. The government needs to fast-track alternate energy routes and sources. Jai Hind!
K
Kiran H
Respectfully, I think some comments are missing the point about nuclear proliferation. A nuclear-armed Iran is a genuine threat to regional stability. The objective might be right, but the method and public messaging by Rubio seem counterproductive. Hope cooler heads in the US administration prevail.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50