Sat, 1 Aug 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jul 31, 2026 · 18:25
World News Updated Jul 31, 2026

South Korea Parliament Passes Bill Stripping Prosecution Powers Amid Protests

South Korea's National Assembly, led by the ruling Democratic Party, passed a bill Friday to abolish the prosecution's direct investigative powers, including supplementary investigations. The revision to the Criminal Procedure Act passed 175-2 after a filibuster by the opposition People Power Party was stopped. Acting Prosecutor General Koo Ja-hyeon offered to resign in protest, while the PPP called on President Lee Jae Myung to veto the bill, labeling it "tailor-made legislation" for his benefit. The government said it respects parliament's decision and will work to implement the changes smoothly.

South Korea's National Assembly passes bill on stripping prosecution of investigative powers

Seoul, July 31

South Korea's National Assembly, led by the ruling Democratic Party, passed a bill Friday aimed at abolishing the prosecution's direct investigative powers amid protest from the main opposition party.

The revision to the Criminal Procedure Act passed a plenary session in a 175-2 vote with one abstention, after the Assembly voted in favour of a motion to stop a filibuster launched by the main opposition People Power Party (PPP) the previous day.

Under the bill, the prosecution will be stripped of its authority to conduct direct investigations, including supplementary investigations. Prosecutors will instead be allowed to request judicial police officers to carry out supplementary investigations, Yonhap News Agency reported.

The revision comes as a follow-up to the prosecution reform legislation that calls for the dismantling of the prosecution and creating two new agencies, tasked with handling investigations and indictments, respectively.

In apparent protest of the contested bill's passage, acting Prosecutor General Koo Ja-hyeon offered to resign shortly after the vote.

"I've just submitted my resignation to take responsibility for the revision," Koo told reporters.

The PPP immediately called on South Korean President Lee Jae Myung to exercise his veto power.

Noting that the bill has a provision allowing the court to relax the requirements for dismissing indictments, Jeong Jeom-sig, the party's floor leader, described it as "tailor-made legislation" for the president whose own criminal trials are currently suspended.

"He should use his veto power as he does not want it to be remembered as the 'Lee Jae Myung escape-from-prison law,'" Jeong said during a press briefing at the National Assembly.

Cheong Wa Dae said it "respects" parliament's decision on the bill's passage.

"We'll do our utmost to ensure the revised law is implemented smoothly and that the public can feel the change in their daily lives," Seong Ghi-hong, senior presidential secretary for public relations and communication, said in a notice to the press.

During the plenary session, the Assembly also introduced a revision to the National Assembly Act aimed at shortening the review period for bills designated for fast track from a maximum of 330 days to 90 days.

The PPP immediately launched a filibuster against the measure. The filibuster is set to automatically end at midnight when the July extraordinary parliamentary session expires.

The bill is expected to be put to a vote at the first plenary session next month.

A filibuster can be stopped after 24 hours if at least three-fifths of all parliament members, or 180 lawmakers, vote to end it.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

This is a bold reform. But as an observer, I wonder if separating investigation from prosecution could lead to coordination issues. Still, it's their democratic process and we should respect it.

Arjun K

The PPP calling it the "Lee Jae Myung escape-from-prison law" shows how polarized their politics have become. Sounds familiar to our own political debates! 😅 Anyway, hope the reforms bring more transparency.

Michael C

From an Indian perspective, this feels like a significant power shift. It will be interesting to see if it leads to fewer politically motivated investigations or if it just creates new bottlenecks. Time will tell.

Sneha F

The filibuster drama sounds like our Parliament sessions! 😄 But jokes apart, any reform that aims to reduce concentration of power is generally a step in the right direction. Need to see how it plays out.

James A

I'm a bit skeptical. Stripping prosecution powers entirely seems extreme. There's a reason investigations are done by trained prosecutors. But it's their sovereign right to decide. Let's hope the checks and balances work effectively.

Vikram M

Their acting prosecutor general resigning shows how contentious this is. In India, we've seen similar resistance to reforms. But if it aims to make the system more accountable, it deserves a chance. Respectful disagreement is part of democracy.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked