South Korea Demands Military Intel Reform After Failed Martial Law Bid

South Korea's Defence Minister has called for a powerful reform of military intelligence and investigative commands in the wake of the failed 2024 martial law bid. The Defence Counterintelligence Command is suspected of playing a key role in former President Yoon Suk Yeol's short-lived martial law imposition. A special advisory committee has even suggested disbanding the counterintelligence command entirely. Meanwhile, the minister has also ordered a thorough probe into North Korea's claims of South Korean drone incursions.

Key Points: S. Korea Military Intelligence Reform After Martial Law Attempt

  • Reform of defence intelligence arms
  • DCC suspected in martial law bid
  • Calls to prevent political tool misuse
  • Committee suggested disbanding DCC
  • Probe ordered into North Korea drone claims
2 min read

South Korea's Defence Minister urges reform of military intelligence commands following martial law

Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back calls for fundamental reform of military intelligence commands following the 2024 botched martial law imposition.

"completely sever itself from the past - Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back"

Seoul, Jan 21

South Korea's Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back on Wednesday called for a powerful reform of defence intelligence and investigative arms amid efforts to rebuild the military in the aftermath of the botched martial law bid in late 2024.

Ahn made the call as he attended a policy briefing session by the Defence Intelligence Command (DIC), the Defence Counterintelligence Command (DCC) and the Criminal Investigation Command (CIC), according to the ministry, Yonhap News Agency reported.

"The task given to the DCC and military intelligence and investigative institutions is a fundamental reform that can rebuild trust in the organisations," Ahn was quoted as saying, especially calling on the counterintelligence to "completely sever itself from the past."

The command is suspected of having played a key role in former President Yoon Suk Yeol's short-lived martial law imposition in late 2024. Its former commander stands trial for allegedly deploying troops to the National Assembly and the National Election Commission on the night of the martial law decree on December 3, 2024.

It is also suspected of organising troops to detain around 10 key politicians, including the then leaders of the ruling and main opposition parties, as well as the National Assembly speaker.

Ahn also emphasised that the DIC should draw up measures to prevent the organisation from again being used as "a political tool" or misusing its intelligence capabilities.

Earlier this month, a special advisory committee tasked with suggesting a reform blueprint for the military called for disbanding the counterintelligence command, in what would mark its dissolution after 49 years upon completion.

Meanwhile, Ahn ordered Brigadier General Park Jung-hun, acting director of the CIC, to "thoroughly probe without a trace of suspicion" allegations surrounding drone incursion claims made by North Korea, according to the ministry.

A joint military-police investigation was launched last week after North Korea claimed South Korea infringed on its sovereignty with drone incursions in September, and on January 4, South Korea's military denied involvement, saying it does not operate the drone models in question.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Reading this from India, it's concerning. Intelligence agencies being used for political purposes is a dangerous precedent. Hope the reforms are genuine and not just for show. The people's trust is hard to win back.
R
Rohit P
Wow, deploying troops to detain opposition leaders? That's straight out of a coup playbook. Glad it failed. It shows even developed democracies aren't immune to such threats. Stay strong, South Korea!
A
Ananya R
The North Korea drone angle is interesting. It's a classic distraction tactic, maybe to test South's response or create internal confusion. The reform is necessary, but the external threat remains very real.
M
Michael C
While the intent for reform is good, I'm skeptical. Disbanding a 49-year-old command is a massive step. The new structure must have stronger oversight and transparency built in from day one.
P
Priya S
"Completely sever itself from the past" – easier said than done. The culture within such institutions takes decades to build and must be rebuilt with care. Hope they focus on ethical training for officers.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50