US-South Korea Defence Talks Focus on OPCON Transfer and Nuclear Subs

South Korean Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth met in Washington to discuss the transfer of wartime operational control from the US to South Korea. The talks also addressed Seoul's push to acquire nuclear-powered submarines and the recent explosion on a South Korean cargo ship in the Strait of Hormuz. Differences emerged over the timeline for OPCON transfer, with US forces commander Gen. Xavier Brunson suggesting it may not be ready until 2029. South Korea is also reviewing its participation in the US-led Maritime Freedom Construct to ensure freedom of navigation in the Middle East.

Key Points: US, S. Korea Defence Chiefs Discuss OPCON Transfer, Hormuz Ship Blast

  • Wartime OPCON transfer timeline discussed
  • Nuclear-powered submarine program push
  • Strait of Hormuz cargo ship explosion investigated
  • Differences emerge over OPCON transfer readiness by 2029
3 min read

South Korean, US defence chiefs hold talks amid OPCON transfer push, Hormuz ship issue

South Korean Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back meets US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to discuss wartime OPCON transfer, nuclear-powered submarines, and the Strait of Hormuz cargo ship explosion.

"South Korea is seeking to retake wartime OPCON before the Lee Jae Myung government's five-year term ends in 2030 - Yonhap news agency"

Seoul/Washington May 11 The top defence chiefs of South Korea and the United States held talks in Washington on Monday, focusing on advancing the transfer of wartime operational control from Washington to Seoul and Korea's push to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back met one-on-one with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to discuss follow-up steps on the OPCON transition and nuclear-powered submarines, in line with the agreements reached between the leaders and at high-level security talks last year, Seoul officials said.

The talks also came a day after South Korea determined a strike by two unidentified flying objects was behind the May 4 explosion and fire on a South Korean-operated cargo vessel in the Strait of Hormuz. The issue could be raised in Monday's talks, Yonhap news agency reported.

South Korea is seeking to retake wartime OPCON before the Lee Jae Myung government's five-year term ends in 2030, reportedly targeting 2028 for the transfer while US President Donald Trump is in office.

However, signs of differing views between the allies have emerged after US Forces Korea commander Gen. Xavier Brunson told Congress last month that the two sides seek to meet conditions required for the transfer no later than the first quarter of 2029.

His proposed timeline suggests the OPCON transfer may not be ready even after Trump's term ends on January 20, 2029.

South Korea handed over operational control of its forces to the US-led UN Command during the 1950-53 Korean War. It retook peacetime OPCON in 1994, but wartime operational command still remains in the US's hands.

Under a three-phase framework, conditions for the transfer include South Korea's capabilities to lead combined Korea-US forces, its strike and air defence capabilities, and a regional security environment conducive to such a handover.

In last year's annual Security Consultative Meeting, Ahn and Hegseth agreed to develop a road map designed to expedite the implementation of conditions for the OPCON transfer and seek to certify the second part of the three-stage program.

The defence chiefs could also address Seoul's findings on the ship blast, as the suspected attack has raised the possibility that South Korea could reconsider its role in efforts to ease tensions in the Middle East.

Seoul has shown reservations about Trump's calls for naval assistance to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The government has said it is reviewing a US proposal for an international coalition aimed at ensuring freedom of navigation in the shipping route, dubbed the "Maritime Freedom Construct" (MFC).

On Sunday, Seoul indicated pursuing "all possible measures" to prevent a recurrence of incidents like the case of the HMM Namu cargo ship and that it is "closely" reviewing participation in the MFC.

At Monday's talks, the two sides are also expected to discuss Seoul's push to build nuclear-powered submarines, amid little progress since Trump gave the green light to the move during his summit talks with President Lee Jae Myung in October last year.

Before departing for Washington on Sunday, Ahn expressed confidence about making progress in talks on the strategic vessels. He did not rule out an inaugural meeting on nuclear-powered submarines taking place before the end of the first half.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Arjun K
Nuclear submarines for South Korea? That would definitely change the balance in East Asia. From an Indian perspective, we understand the strategic value of nuclear-powered subs. But the US conditions seem strict - first you need to meet certain capabilities, then maybe they'll transfer control. Classic chicken-and-egg game đŸ¤”
P
Priya S
The Strait of Hormuz incident is very alarming. After the foreign office incident last year, now this. South Korea needs to take a strong stand - either join the MFC or find alternative routes. India has always maintained freedom of navigation is crucial. But I wonder if Korea is being pressured by the US to take a more active role in the Middle East.
M
Michael C
As someone who follows East Asian security, the 2029 timeline from Gen. Brunson is interesting. It suggests the US wants to ensure the conditions are truly met before handing over wartime control. The submarine issue is also complex - Australia is still waiting for their nuclear subs under AUKUS. Korea might face similar delays.
S
Sneha F
Why is South Korea still under US wartime operational control after 70+ years? That's a long time. As an Indian, we gained full military independence long ago. Korea should have set a firmer deadline. The 2028 target seems reasonable but the US general's testimony hints at more delays. Time for Korea to assert more sovereignty in defense matters.
A
Aman W
The submarine issue is tricky. South Korea has the technology but nuclear propulsion requires US approval due to non-proliferation agreements. India managed to get a waiver for our own program. Hope Korea can find a way too

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50