South Korea Considers Phased Support for US Maritime Security in Strait of Hormuz

South Korea has announced it will review making phased contributions to the US-led 'Project Freedom' initiative for safe passage in the Strait of Hormuz. Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back stated Seoul will explore gradual forms of support, including declarations, personnel, intelligence, and military assets. The decision follows US urging for allies to support maritime security amid conflict with Iran. Meanwhile, President Trump indicated he may revive the initiative as 'Project Freedom plus' if a deal with Iran is not reached.

Key Points: South Korea to Review Phased Support for US Strait of Hormuz Initiative

  • South Korea reviews phased contributions to US maritime security initiative
  • Potential support includes declarations, personnel, intelligence, and assets
  • No direct military deployment discussed yet
  • Trump considers reviving 'Project Freedom' as 'Project Freedom plus' if no Iran deal
4 min read

South Korea to consider phased contribution to US maritime security initiative in Strait of Hormuz

South Korea reviews phased contributions to US-led 'Project Freedom' for maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz, exploring support options like personnel and intelligence.

"We will participate as a responsible member of the international community and review ways to contribute in phases. - Ahn Gyu-back"

Seoul, May 13

South Korea has said it will review making phased contributions to a United States-led initiative referring to President Donald Trump's "Project Freedom" aimed at ensuring safe passage of commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, Yonhap News Agency reported.

According to Yonhap News Agency, the announcement was made by South Korean Defence Minister Ahn Gyu-back on Wednesday after talks with US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

Addressing reporters at the South Korean Embassy in Washington, Ahn said Seoul had conveyed its intention to participate in line with its responsibilities as a global partner while exploring gradual forms of support.

"We will participate as a responsible member of the international community and review ways to contribute in phases," Ahn said, as quoted by Yonhap News Agency, noting that discussions with the US side covered multiple forms of possible assistance.

He said potential contributions could include declarations of support, deployment of personnel, intelligence sharing and provision of military assets.

However, he clarified that detailed discussions on direct military deployment had not taken place. "There are also matters that must follow our domestic legal procedures," he said, as quoted by Yonhap News Agency.

The development comes after Trump and Hegseth urged allies to support efforts to restore maritime security in the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz amid the conflict with Iran in the region.

Ahn also said Seoul had briefed Washington on its ongoing investigation into an incident involving the South Korean-operated cargo ship HMM Namu in the region, adding that Seoul could provide technical and advisory assistance if required, Yonhap News Agency reported.

According to the minister, the US side also expressed understanding of South Korea's push for the early transfer of wartime operational control (OPCON) under agreed conditions.

Ahn further reiterated Seoul's position on the OPCON transfer, stating: "From our standpoint, we are firm in the position of an early OPCON transfer with no wavering on that point," Yonhap News Agency reported.

He also said no discussions were held on reducing US troop presence in South Korea or on strategic flexibility of US Forces Korea during the talks.

This comes after Trump on Friday said his administration may consider reviving the now-suspended maritime security initiative, "Project Freedom", aimed at helping the passage of commercial vessels trapped in the Strait of Hormuz amid escalating regional tensions in the Gulf.

If a deal is not reached with Iran, Trump added that the renewed effort would be expanded into what he called "Project Freedom plus."

Speaking to reporters at the White House before travelling to a dinner at his golf course in Sterling, Virginia, Trump said that he might "go back to Project Freedom" if a deal is not reached, but it would be "Project Freedom plus", noting that the initiative would be the same as its predecessor, "plus other things".

"We'll go a different route if everything doesn't get signed up, buttoned up," Trump said.

"I think Project Freedom is good, but I think we have other ways of doing it also. We may go back to Project Freedom if things don't happen, but it'd be Project Freedom plus, meaning Project Freedom plus other things," he added.

This comes after Trump last week declared that "Project Freedom" will be temporarily paused while the naval blockade of Iran's ports remains in place.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the decision was taken following requests from Pakistan, which has been acting as a mediator to broker a peace deal between Washington and Tehran, and other countries.

Trump further claimed that the decision also followed what he described as significant military gains during the campaign against Iran and progress toward a potential agreement with Iranian representatives.

The US President further noted that the pause was announced to "see whether or not the Agreement can be finalised and signed" between Tehran and Washington.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As an Indian, I'm watching this Project Freedom saga with some caution. Trump keeps flip-flopping – first it's on, then paused, then "Project Freedom plus"? It feels like another geopolitical drama where smaller nations get caught in the crossfire. South Korea is smart to take a phased approach rather than jumping in.
V
Vikram M
The OPCON transfer issue is the real story here for me. South Korea wanting control of its own wartime operations while the US pushes for help in the Gulf – classic alliance balancing act. Reminds me of how India manages its strategic autonomy. We should never put all our eggs in one basket.
M
Meera T
Pakistan acting as mediator between US and Iran? That's unexpected. With India's close ties to Iran and our own interests in Chabahar port, this whole situation feels like a chess game where we need to be extra careful. The Strait of Hormuz is too critical for our energy security to ignore. 😟
S
Siddharth J
One thing I appreciate about South Korea's approach – they're not blindly signing up. "Review ways to contribute in phases" and following domestic legal procedures shows maturity. India should adopt similar caution when US asks for military commitments. Our Parliament should have a say too.
A
Ananya R
This Project Freedom pause while Pakistan mediates – hmm. As an Indian, it's interesting to see our neighbor in that role. But more importantly, I hope South Korea's phased contribution doesn't become a slippery slope into deeper military involvement. The Gulf doesn't need more conflict right now.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50