Iran Envoy Accuses US of Blocking Strait of Hormuz Security Plan

Iran's Deputy Representative in India, Dr Mohammad Hossein Ziyaeenia, has accused the United States of deliberately rejecting a proposed formal security mechanism for the Strait of Hormuz. He suggested Washington's opposition hints at a "plan" to maintain instability rather than foster global trade security. Ziyaeenia argued that Iran relies on the waterway for its own economic survival, making a blockade counterintuitive. He also rejected allegations of Iranian disruptions, suggesting incidents may be false flag operations by the US Navy.

Key Points: Iran Envoy: US Blocks Strait of Hormuz Security Mechanism

  • Iran proposes sovereign maritime security framework for Strait of Hormuz
  • US accused of rejecting mechanism to maintain instability
  • Iran denies blockade allegations, cites economic reliance on waterway
  • Deputy Representative suggests false flag operations by US Navy
3 min read

"Some plan": Iran's envoy accuses US of thwarting formal security mechanism for Strait of Hormuz

Iran's deputy envoy accuses the US of rejecting a formal security mechanism for the Strait of Hormuz, alleging a plan to maintain instability.

"They have some plan. So they understood that their plan would not work with this, so they said that the Strait of Hormuz should be blocked. - Dr Mohammad Hossein Ziyaeenia"

New Delhi, April 29

In a sharp critique of Western maritime policy, Dr Mohammad Hossein Ziyaeenia, the Deputy Representative of the Supreme Leader of Iran in India, has accused the United States of deliberately rejecting a proposed structured framework for security in the Strait of Hormuz.

Speaking with ANI on Tuesday, Ziyaeenia suggested that Washington's opposition to a formal transit mechanism hints at a "plan" to maintain instability rather than foster global trade security.

Ziyaeenia emphasised that Iran has actively proposed a sovereign maritime framework to ensure the safe passage of goods through the strategic waterway, a chokepoint vital for energy markets in Asia and Europe. He questioned why a global power like the US would oppose such an order.

"So Iran is suggesting this mechanism. But they say no, there should be no mechanism. Why? Are they against the order? The issue is what they want; they have some plan. So they understood that their plan would not work with this, so they said that the Strait of Hormuz should be blocked," the Deputy Representative said.

Addressing long-standing allegations that Tehran is responsible for maritime harassment and blockades, the Deputy Representative turned the narrative back on the US Navy. He argued that Iran, as a regional power, has the most to lose from a closed Strait.

"We need this Strait of Hormuz; the people in the region need this Strait of Hormuz, and the people in the world need this Strait of Hormuz. So we are all responsible for this, to put pressure on those countries that are putting a blockade on this Strait and to make it open," he added.

Ziyaeenia noted that Iran relies on the waterway for its own economic survival, making a blockade counterintuitive.

"First of all, we have to consider that no one is benefiting from the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Because we are living in this region, and our benefit is that the Strait of Hormuz remains open, and because this is also the way and the path that we require," he said.

He also addressed allegations that Iran was responsible for initiating disruptions in the waterway, rejecting claims made by external actors.

"The US Navy is saying that we are the ones who have put a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz, right? So if it is like that and they want to shoot at the ships, you have seen that they have shot, they have targeted our ships," the Deputy Representative added.

He suggested that incidents during periods of conflict are often misattributed to Iran.

"So now this is the possibility that when the ships come, because the situation is a war situation, someone would target them and then attribute it to the Islamic Republic of Iran," he said, adding that Iran has consistently denied involvement in such incidents.

When asked whether he was implying false flag operations, he responded, "Yes, definitely. Because we saw it. During the war, it happened not a single time but more than four or five times."

The Deputy Representative concluded by framing the security of the Strait as a collective global responsibility. He urged the international community to shift its pressure toward those he claims are actually obstructing the waterway.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Honestly, it feels like the US wants chaos in the region so they can justify their military presence there. India should support Iran's proposal for a structured security mechanism - it makes logical sense for a regional power to manage its own waters rather than having outsiders dictate terms.
J
James A
Iran has a point about needing the strait open for their own economy, but their past actions don't inspire trust. The US has its own interests, but blocking a security framework without a clear alternative seems counterproductive. India should push for a multilateral solution that includes all stakeholders.
N
Nisha Z
The false flag allegations are alarming but not surprising. Major powers have a history of manipulating events in the Gulf. India should maintain its independent foreign policy and not get caught between US and Iranian narratives. Our energy security depends on a stable Hormuz, not on picking sides. 🇮🇳
M
Michael C
This is classic geopolitical maneuvering. Iran wants legitimacy and control, the US wants to maintain its dominance. The reality is both sides have contributed to instability. India's best bet is to strengthen ties with both while advocating for a neutral, UN-backed security framework for the strait.
V
Varun X
While I appreciate Iran's proposal, we mustn't forget their history of seizing tankers and threatening shipping. That said, the US rejecting a formal mechanism does raise eyebrows. India should use its good offices with both countries to facilitate dialogue - we have credibility on both sides. The Strait of Hormuz is too important for grandstanding.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50