Iran Denies US "Pre-emptive" Attack Claims, Calls Operation "Epic Mistake"

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi has categorically denied U.S. claims that Iran was planning a pre-emptive attack, labeling the accusation a lie meant to justify the U.S.-led "Operation Epic Mistake." U.S. officials, including former President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, defended the military action as necessary to prevent an imminent Iranian strike. The conflict has expanded, with Iranian retaliatory strikes targeting U.S. assets and regional infrastructure in several Gulf nations. This escalation is disrupting global energy supplies, particularly through the critical Strait of Hormuz.

Key Points: Iran Denies US Claims of Planned Attack, Criticizes Operation

  • Iran denies planning pre-emptive US attack
  • FM calls US claim a lie to justify operation
  • US officials cite intelligence of imminent Iranian strike
  • Conflict expands with Iranian strikes on regional bases
  • Global energy supplies face disruption
3 min read

"Sole purpose of lie is to justify Operation Epic Mistake": Iran denies claims of "pre-emptive" attacks on US

Iranian FM dismisses US claims of a planned Iranian attack as a "sheer lie" to justify Operation Epic Mistake, amid escalating West Asia tensions.

"The sole purpose of that lie is to justify Operation Epic Mistake - Seyed Abbas Araghchi"

Tehran, March 11

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi on Wednesday denied the claims that the country was planning a "pre-emptive" attack on the US and its forces, a claim that the United States has peddled to attack the Persian Gulf country.

Dismissing it as a lie, Araghchi called Operation Epic Fury a grave misadventure.

In a post on X, the Iranian Foreign Minister said, "The claim that Iran was planning on attacking the U.S. or U.S. Forces, whether preventively or preemptively, is a sheer and utter lie. The sole purpose of that lie is to justify Operation Epic Mistake, a misadventure engineered by Israel and paid for by ordinary Americans."

His remarks come amid the backdrop of US President Donald Trump on Monday during a press briefing saying that the military actions in Iran were something he "felt" had to be done.

Trump had told reporters, "I felt it (military action in Iran) was something we had to do. I didn't feel we had a choice. If we didn't do it they (Iran) would have done it to us. I felt based on the negotiations that were being had by Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Marco and Pete and everybody was involved, I felt that they were going to that they were looking to tap us along before they hit. And I thought they were going to hit and if they hit us first that would have been a very bad thing."

Earlier, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, "We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action. We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties."

Meanwhile, on Tuesday, during a press briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reiterated the stance of Trump, adding that the "feeling" was based on "facts".

She told the media, "It was not the first time the President has said that he chose to launch Operation Epic Fury because he felt as though Iran was going to strike the United States and our assets in the region first. This was a feeling the President had based on facts--facts provided to him by his top negotiators who had been engaged with the Iranian regime in a good faith effort."

Earlier on Tuesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian recalled the civilizational history of Iran and underlined, "aggressors have come and gone; Iran has endured".

He said in a post on X, "Iran is the heir to a civilization at least 6,000 years old. Through the trials of history, no power has ever succeeded in erasing this storied name. Anyone who entertains the illusion of destroying Iran knows nothing of history. Aggressors have come and gone; Iran has endured."

The developments follow amid an escalating security situation in West Asia, which has resulted in the conflict being now expanded beyond Iran, with Iranian retaliatory strikes--using missiles and drones--targeting U.S. military bases, embassies, and civilian/energy infrastructure in neighbouring Gulf nations, including the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Jordan.

The conflict has caused significant disruptions to global energy supplies, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz, where approximately 20% of the world's oil transits.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The Iranian President's point about their civilization enduring is powerful. But at what cost to regional stability? This tit-for-tat is hurting ordinary people across West Asia and beyond.
A
Arjun K
As an Indian, my main concern is for our diaspora in the UAE and Gulf countries. Their safety is paramount. Hope our embassies are on high alert and evacuation plans are ready if needed. 🙏
P
Priya S
Both sides are just blaming each other. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. But the real victims are civilians and the global economy. Petrol prices are already pinching our household budget.
M
Michael C
With respect, I think India should play a more active diplomatic role here. We have good relations with both the Gulf nations and Iran. This is a chance for quiet diplomacy to de-escalate.
K
Kavya N
Operation Epic Mistake is a fitting name if it's based on a 'feeling' rather than solid proof. The Strait of Hormuz is too critical to be held hostage by geopolitics. This affects every Indian at the pump.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50