Skills and Reforms Key to India's Next Phase of Economic Growth

Experts at the New India Conference in Washington emphasized that India's sustained high growth depends on investments in human capital and regulatory reforms. Hemang Jani highlighted the need for 8% growth over two decades, citing unemployment and skilling constraints as key challenges. Nisha Biswal noted that shifting global supply chains and concerns over China are driving greater interest in India. Richard Rossow stressed that state-level reforms in power, labor, and land access will be decisive in attracting investment.

Key Points: Skills, Policy Reforms Key to Sustaining India's Growth

  • Sustained 8% growth needed for two decades
  • Human capital and regulatory reforms critical
  • US-India trade ties reshaping global supply chains
  • State-level reforms key to attracting investment
4 min read

Skills, policy reforms key to India's growth push

Experts at New India Conference say India's high growth depends on human capital investment, regulatory reforms, and state-level governance to sustain momentum.

"India's potential is immense, but so are challenges. - Hemang Jani"

Washington, April 23

India's push to sustain high economic growth over the next two decades will hinge on investments in human capital and regulatory reforms, a senior policy expert said, flagging skills and workforce gaps as key challenges to the country's long-term ambitions.

Speaking at the New India Conference here, Hemang Jani, Public Policy & Governance expert at the World Bank and former OSD to the Prime Minister's Office, said India remains well-positioned globally but must accelerate reforms to fully realise its potential.

"India remains the world's fastest growing major economy" and is "on pace to become the third largest economy by 2030," Jani said, while cautioning that "India's potential is immense, but so are challenges."

He stressed that sustaining momentum would require a sharper growth trajectory.

"To achieve these ambitions, India's economic growth would need to be at least 8 per cent, if not higher, for two decades," he said, highlighting unemployment, underemployment and skilling constraints.

India is targeting sustained expansion through "very definitive investments in human capital" alongside improvements in "regulatory... predictability," adding that skills development and workforce participation, particularly among women, remain critical "binding constraints," he said.

From the US perspective, Nisha Biswal, Partner at The Asia Group and former US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs, said India's economic rise is reshaping bilateral engagement.

"There has been enormous progress," Biswal said, noting that two-way trade has grown "from 50 billion... to... about 212 billion" even without a formal trade agreement.

She said shifting global supply chains and concerns over dependence on China are driving greater interest in India. Businesses are increasingly assessing "what does a de-risking from China look like," she said, pointing to India's market size and talent pool as major advantages.

Biswal described the current phase as "India's moment on the economic space," while noting that the pace of growth in trade and investment will depend on how quickly the two countries can deepen economic ties.

She said a US-India trade agreement is likely to emerge over time, though it may initially take the form of a phased arrangement rather than a comprehensive pact.

Adding to the discussion, Ashok Malik, Partner and Chair of India Practice at The Asia Group, said New Delhi has recalibrated its trade strategy after earlier agreements exposed domestic vulnerabilities.

"That did cause a recalibration of approach to trade," Malik said, citing concerns over "cheap consumer goods imports from... China-linked supply chains."

He said India is now pursuing trade agreements that support domestic manufacturing while safeguarding sensitive sectors, but noted that differences over scope have slowed progress with Washington. "The search for a maximalist trade agreement is coming in the way of a very workable... arrangement," he said.

At the subnational level, Richard Rossow, Senior Adviser and Chair on India and Emerging Asia Economics at CSIS, said reforms in Indian states will be decisive in attracting investment.

"States run the country," Rossow said, emphasising that companies prioritise reliable power, labour flexibility and access to land and water when making investment decisions.

He added that these factors form the "first 20 slides" in corporate decision-making, underscoring the need for consistent policy execution across states.

The panel, moderated by Aparna Pande, Senior Fellow at Hudson Institute, was part of the New India Conference in Washington, which brought together policymakers and analysts to assess India's economic trajectory and its implications for US-India ties.

India's economic outlook comes amid global uncertainty, including supply chain shifts and geopolitical tensions. The country has expanded infrastructure, digital systems and manufacturing capacity in recent years, positioning itself as a key player in global supply chains.

As India seeks to sustain high growth and deepen its partnership with the United States, experts said progress in skills development, regulatory reforms and state-level governance will be critical in shaping the next phase of its economic rise.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Good to see women's workforce participation highlighted as a binding constraint. We have so many talented women in India who want to work but face social barriers, safety issues, and lack of flexible policies. If we can tap into that potential, our GDP growth could easily cross 8%! 🇮🇳
A
Ashok Malik
The point about states running the country is spot on. Look at Gujarat vs some other states - the difference in ease of doing business is huge. We need uniform reforms across all states, especially in power supply and land acquisition. Otherwise investment will remain concentrated in a few pockets.
S
Sneha F
I agree we need trade agreements but not at the cost of our farmers and small industries. The earlier FTAs with ASEAN and Korea hurt our dairy and steel sectors. So a calibrated approach makes sense. Let's learn from past mistakes and negotiate smartly with the US. 🇮🇳
K
Karthik V
The de-risking from China comment is interesting! With companies looking for alternatives, India has a golden opportunity. But we need to simplify our tax regime and reduce red tape first. Many foreign investors still complain about compliance burden. Let's fix this and we'll see FDI boom!
G
Geeta V
I worry about unemployment though. Even with 7% growth, we're not creating enough jobs for our youth. The skilling programs exist but quality is poor. And what about the gig economy workers? They need social security too. Growth must be inclusive, not just for the top 10%.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50