NewKerala.com

UN Security Council Renews South Sudan Mission Mandate with Reduced Troops

The UN Security Council adopted Resolution 2820 to renew the mandate of the UN Mission in South Sudan for one year. The resolution reduces the troop ceiling from 17,000 to 12,500 while maintaining police levels at 2,101. China and Russia abstained, objecting to the troop reduction and perceived pressure on the South Sudanese government. The US faced divergences from other Council members over the mission's strategic direction, resources, and omission of language on women, peace and security.

Key Points: UN Renews South Sudan Mission with Reduced Troop Ceiling

  • UN Security Council renews UNMISS mandate until April 2027
  • Troop ceiling reduced from 17,000 to 12,500
  • China and Russia abstain over troop cut and pressure on South Sudan
  • US penholder faces divergences over mandate direction and resources
2 min read

Security Council renews mandate of UN Mission in South Sudan with reduced troop ceiling

Security Council renews UNMISS mandate for one year, reducing troop ceiling from 17,000 to 12,500. China and Russia abstain over troop reduction and pressure on South Sudan.

"We could not agree on the reduction in the troop ceiling and on the draft resolution's attempt to exert pressure on the South Sudanese government. - China and Russia explanation"

United Nations, May 1

The Security Council adopted a resolution to renew the mandate of the UN Mission in South Sudan for one year, until April 30, 2027, with a reduced troop ceiling.

Resolution 2820 won the support of 13 of the Security Council's 15 members, while China and Russia abstained.

Both China and Russia, in their explanations of the vote, expressed regret over the handling of the draft by the United States, the penholder on South Sudan. They said they supported extending UNMISS's mandate, but could not agree on the reduction in the troop ceiling and on the draft resolution's attempt to exert pressure on the South Sudanese government.

The resolution decides to reduce the troop ceiling from 17,000 to 12,500 personnel while maintaining the police ceiling at 2,101 personnel.

It also expresses the Security Council's readiness to consider further adjustments to UNMISS force levels and mandated tasks, based on security conditions on the ground and the transitional government's cooperation with the mission, Xinhua news agency reported.

The US apparently sought to streamline the mission's mandate in line with its stated priorities. Although some Council members acknowledged the US' rationale, divergences emerged over key issues, including the overall strategic direction of UNMISS' mandate; the mission's role in supporting the peace process in South Sudan; proposed reductions in the mission's capacity, resources, and tasks; and the omission of language on thematic areas such as women, peace and security (WPS), climate change, and children and armed conflict (CAAC). It appears that the EU4 members coordinated closely and submitted joint comments, strongly advocating for their positions on these issues.

It seems that the initial draft text proposed by the US said that UNMISS' mandate is aimed at preventing a return to civil war and the escalation of violence in South Sudan. It further noted that the Council will continually assess and review its support for the mission based on progress, or lack thereof, in the protection of civilians (PoC), the facilitation of humanitarian access, and improvements in the political and security environment by the parties to the conflict.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sneha F
Honestly, this feels like the US is trying to cut costs at the expense of South Sudanese people's safety. 12,500 troops for a country that has seen so much violence? That's a huge reduction. And leaving out women and children's issues from the mandate is just wrong. India should speak up more on this.
R
Ravi K
As an Indian, I've always respected our country's role in UN peacekeeping. But seeing this resolution pass with such a significant troop cut makes me worried. South Sudan is not ready for this reduction. The Security Council should be more cautious and not let politics dictate security.
K
Kiran H
I'm glad China and Russia abstained. They saw the flaws in this resolution. Reducing troops when the peace process is still shaky is not wise. And dropping WPS and climate change language? That's a step backward. The UN should lead by example, not bow to one country's agenda.
N
Nitin Z
The EU4 countries seem to have pushed back, which is good. But the fact that the US went ahead anyway shows how power dynamics work in the Security Council. India needs to have a stronger voice in these matters. We contribute so many troops to UN missions, yet our opinion is often sidelined. 😔
P
Priya S
A reduction from 17,000 to 12,500 is a 26% cut. That's massive. While I understand the need for efficient use of resources, you can't compromise on human lives. The Security Council should have waited for more progress on the ground before making such a drastic change. South Sudan deserves better.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50