Wed, 20 May 2026 · LIVE
Updated May 19, 2026 · 20:56
India News Updated May 19, 2026

SEBI Proposes API-Based Overhaul to Speed Up Institutional Trades

SEBI has proposed replacing the centralized Straight Through Processing (STP) hub model with a direct API-based communication framework for institutional trades. The current system adds latency, increases costs, and creates concentration risk as 95-99% of traffic goes through a single provider. The new framework would allow service providers to communicate directly via APIs, improving efficiency and resilience. The regulator clarified that no major system-level changes are needed for users and has invited public comments until June 9.

SEBI proposes API-based overhaul of institutional trade processing system

New Delhi, May 19

India's capital markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India on Tuesday proposed a major revamp of the trade-processing mechanism used for institutional stock market transactions, seeking to cut delays, lower costs and reduce dependence on a single infrastructure provider.

In a consultation paper, SEBI proposed replacing the existing centralised Straight Through Processing (STP) hub model with a direct communication framework based on application programming interfaces (APIs).

The regulator said the current structure introduces additional latency, increases operational costs and creates concentration risks in the market infrastructure ecosystem.

STP is the backend framework that enables the exchange of trade-related messages -- including electronic contract notes and settlement instructions -- among brokers, custodians and institutional investors. The mechanism is mandatory for institutional trades that are settled through custodians.

At present, communication between different service providers passes through a central hub before reaching the intended participant. According to SEBI, this arrangement adds extra transmission time and results in higher charges for market participants. The regulator also flagged the growing concentration risk in the system, noting that nearly 95-99 per cent of all STP traffic is currently handled by a single service provider, creating the possibility of a single point of failure.

Under the proposed framework, service providers would be able to communicate directly with one another through APIs instead of routing messages via the centralized hub. SEBI said the move would improve operational efficiency, enhance scalability and strengthen the resilience of the institutional trade-processing system while also reducing costs.

The regulator clarified that the proposed changes would not require brokers, custodians, institutional investors or other STP users to make major system-level modifications.

SEBI has also proposed enabling optional API-based communication between users serviced by the same provider. The regulator said this could help reduce dependence on manual file uploads and downloads, which remain vulnerable to operational errors.

The market watchdog has invited public comments on the proposal until June 9.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Sarah B

As someone working in fintech, this is a welcome shift. API-based communication reduces latency and operational costs significantly. But I hope SEBI ensures proper cybersecurity standards because direct API connections can also introduce new risks if not implemented carefully.

Priya S

Finally! The centralized hub model was outdated. I've seen how manual file uploads cause errors in settlement instructions. APIs will make things smoother for custodians too. But will smaller brokers have the technical capability to adopt this quickly? Need some transition support.

Michael C

SEBI is clearly learning from global best practices. The UK and US markets moved to API-based systems years ago. India's capital markets are maturing fast, and this will attract more FIIs who value efficiency. The June 9 deadline for comments is reasonable too.

Vikram M

I appreciate SEBI's proactive approach. However, I'm a bit concerned about the concentration risk the article mentions—one provider handling 95-99% of traffic. Is that a monopoly issue? Regulatory action is needed, but let's hope the transition doesn't disrupt market operations. Also, cost reduction for participants is key.

Emma D

This is a textbook example of smart regulation—addressing inefficiency while future-proofing the system. The optional API-based communication within same providers is a nice touch too. But SEBI must ensure the API standards are open and interoperable to avoid creating new monopolies.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.