SC Urges Centre to Recognise Paternity Leave, Strikes Down Adoption Rule

The Supreme Court has urged the central government to enact a law recognising paternity leave as a social security benefit. The court struck down a legal provision that limited maternity leave for adoptive mothers to cases where the adopted child was below three months old. It ruled this age-based restriction was unconstitutional and created an unreasonable classification. The bench emphasised the equal needs of adoptive children and the importance of recognising fathers as equal caregivers for child development and gender equality.

Key Points: SC Urges Law for Paternity Leave, Strikes Down Adoption Rule

  • SC urges law for paternity leave
  • Strikes down age-limit for adoptive mothers' leave
  • Highlights equal needs of adopted children
  • Calls for recognising fathers as caregivers
3 min read

SC urges Centre to recognise paternity leave

Supreme Court urges Centre to enact paternity leave law, strikes down provision limiting maternity benefits for adoptive mothers based on child's age.

"We urge the Union to come out with a provision recognising paternity leave as a social security benefit. - Justice J.B. Pardiwala"

New Delhi, March 17

The Supreme Court on Tuesday urged the Union government to enact a law recognising paternity leave as a social security benefit, while striking down a provision that limited maternity benefits for adoptive mothers based on the child's age.

A bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan observed that the question of granting paternity leave, including its duration and conditions, falls within the policy domain of the Centre, but stressed the need for a legal framework acknowledging fathers as equal caregivers.

"We urge the Union to come out with a provision recognising paternity leave as a social security benefit. The duration of such leave must be determined in a manner that is responsive to the needs of both the parent and the child," the Justice Pardiwala-led Bench said.

The observations came while the top court delivered its verdict on a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the constitutional validity of provisions that limited maternity leave for adoptive mothers.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court struck down Section 60(4) of the Social Security Code, 2020, which provided that adoptive mothers would be entitled to maternity leave only if the adopted child was below three months of age.

The bench held that the provision created an unreasonable classification and violated the guarantee of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.

"The needs of an adoptive child are no different from those of a biological child. Although biology has traditionally been the predominant lens through which kinship is understood, adoption is an equally valid pathway. Biological factors by themselves do not determine family. An adopted child is not different from a natural child," the apex court said.

The PIL had originally challenged Section 5(4) of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, introduced through the 2017 amendment, which granted 12 weeks of maternity leave to adoptive mothers only when the adopted child was below three months old.

During the pendency of the PIL, a similar provision was incorporated under the Social Security Code, 2020.

Holding the restriction to be unconstitutional, the bench held that the benefits of maternity leave must extend uniformly to all adoptive mothers, irrespective of the age of the child at the time of adoption.

The apex court further highlighted that the needs of an adoptive child are no different from those of a biological child, particularly in the early stages of integration into a new family environment. It also highlighted the broader importance of shared parenting and the need to recognise fathers' role in early childcare, observing that such recognition could contribute to better developmental outcomes for children while promoting greater gender equality in caregiving responsibilities.

At present, Indian law provides for paid maternity leave of up to 26 weeks under the Maternity Benefit Act for eligible women, but there is no comprehensive statutory framework governing paternity leave.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
As a new father, I completely support this. I had to use all my casual leave when my daughter was born. A proper paternity leave policy would have made a huge difference. Shared parenting benefits the entire family.
A
Ananya R
The part about adoptive mothers is so important. Why should the child's age matter? Bonding is crucial regardless. The court is right – an adopted child is not different from a natural child. This removes a major hurdle for adoptive parents.
D
David E
While the intent is good, I hope the government designs this carefully. In the private sector, especially in SMEs, mandatory paid leave can be a burden. The policy should balance employee welfare with practical business realities.
K
Karthik V
Great step forward for gender equality. When fathers take leave, it normalizes their role as caregivers and reduces the "motherhood penalty" at work. It's not just a women's issue, it's a family issue. Hope the Centre acts swiftly on the SC's urging.
S
Sarah B
The observation about the needs of adoptive children is spot on. The initial integration period is critical for attachment, whether the child is 3 months or 3 years old. This judgment brings our laws in line with a more modern understanding of family.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50