SC Seeks Report on Bengal Poll Tribunals Amid Functioning Concerns

The Supreme Court has decided to seek a report from the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court regarding the functioning of appellate tribunals set up to hear electoral roll disputes in West Bengal. Senior advocate Devdatt Kamat raised concerns that the tribunals were not working effectively, were accepting only internet-based applications, and were disallowing legal representation. The court noted repeated mentions on similar issues and indicated it would call for a response. These tribunals were constituted following earlier Supreme Court orders to provide an independent forum for adjudicating disputes arising from the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.

Key Points: SC Seeks Report on Bengal Electoral Roll Tribunals' Functioning

  • SC to seek report from Calcutta HC CJ
  • Tribunals allegedly not functioning effectively
  • Concerns over digital-only applications
  • Disputes arise from Special Intensive Revision
  • Apex court had mandated independent appellate mechanism
2 min read

SC seeks report on functioning of SIR appellate tribunals in Bengal

Supreme Court to seek report from Calcutta HC Chief Justice on appellate tribunals for electoral roll disputes in West Bengal.

"The appellate tribunals are not working... The orders of this court are not being followed. - Senior counsel Devdatt Kamat"

New Delhi, April 20

The Supreme Court on Monday said it would seek a report from the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court on the functioning of appellate tribunals constituted to hear electoral roll disputes arising out of the Special Intensive Revision exercise in poll-bound West Bengal.

The issue was mentioned before a Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi by senior advocate Devdatt Kamat.

Kamat submitted that the appellate tribunals, set up pursuant to the apex court's earlier directions, were not functioning effectively and were allegedly not complying with the top court's orders.

Kamat argued that the appellate bodies were accepting only Internet-based applications and disallowing legal representation, thereby depriving individuals of an effective opportunity to pursue their appeals.

"The appellate tribunals are not working. Only computer and Internet-based applications are being taken. Representation is not being allowed. The orders of this court are not being followed," the senior counsel submitted.

Taking note of the grievance, CJI Kant observed that repeated mentions were being made on similar issues and indicated that the Supreme Court would call for a response from the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court.

"Some or the other new mention regarding all this. Let us take a report from the Chief Justice of the High Court today itself," the CJI Kant-led Bench said.

The development assumes significance in view of the apex court's earlier orders mandating the creation of an independent appellate mechanism to adjudicate disputes relating to inclusion and exclusion from electoral rolls during the SIR exercise.

In March, the top court had directed the constitution of appellate tribunals comprising former High Court Chief Justices and judges, to ensure an independent forum for adjudicating electoral roll disputes.

It had authorised the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court to recommend names for such tribunals, with the Election Commission of India (ECI) tasked with issuing formal notifications and bearing the associated costs.

Subsequently, in an order passed earlier this month, the apex court clarified that persons excluded from the revised electoral rolls would be entitled to vote only if their appeals were allowed by the appellate tribunals within the stipulated timelines.

It had also recorded that multiple tribunals had been constituted and were functioning under a Standard Operating Procedure framed by a committee of former judges.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Only internet-based applications? In a state like Bengal, with many rural areas, this is a huge problem. Not everyone has reliable internet access. This seems like a way to exclude people from the process. The system should be accessible to all.
R
Rohit P
Good that the SC is stepping in again. Electoral integrity is the foundation of democracy. If the appellate mechanism itself is faulty, the whole revision exercise is pointless. Hope the Calcutta HC Chief Justice gives a clear report.
A
Anjali F
While I support digital initiatives, disallowing legal representation is completely unacceptable. A person's right to vote is fundamental. They must have a fair chance to appeal with proper legal help if needed. The tribunals need to function as ordered.
M
Michael C
Observing from outside, it's concerning to see repeated judicial interventions needed for basic electoral procedures. The fact that "repeated mentions" are being made suggests systemic non-compliance. The Supreme Court's patience seems to be wearing thin, rightly so.
K
Karthik V
The timing is everything. With elections around the corner, a smooth and fair appellate process is crucial. Any hiccup can lead to major disputes later. The ECI also needs to ensure its notifications are implemented properly on the ground.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50