Wed, 12 Aug 2026 · LIVE
Updated Aug 11, 2026 · 13:55
India News Updated Aug 11, 2026

Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Reply on Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's Ashes Return from Japan

The Supreme Court has sought the Centre's response on a plea by Anita B. Pfaff, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's daughter, to bring his mortal remains from Japan. A bench led by CJI Surya Kant issued notice to the Union government and ministries, with the next hearing set for September 28. The ashes, preserved at Renkoji Temple in Tokyo, are central to the plea, which asserts Pfaff's right as legal heir. This follows a March decision where the court declined a similar petition by grandnephew Ashish Ray, urging the heir to approach directly.

SC seeks Centre's response on petition seeking return of Subhas Chandra Bose's ashes from Japan

New Delhi, Aug 11

The Supreme Court on Tuesday sought the response of the Centre on a plea seeking directions for bringing back the mortal remains of freedom fighter and Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose from Japan to India.

A Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana issued notice to the Union government, the Ministry of External Affairs and the Ministry of Home Affairs on the plea filed by Anita B. Pfaff, Netaji's daughter.

Senior advocate Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi appeared for Netaji's daughter before the CJI Kant-led Bench.

The matter has been listed for further hearing on September 28.

The plea seeks the return of Netaji's mortal remains from the Renkoji Temple in Tokyo, Japan, where ashes believed to be those of Subhas Chandra Bose have been preserved for decades.

The petitioner has sought appropriate directions to the Union government for bringing the remains back to India, asserting that Anita Bose Pfaff, being Netaji's daughter and legal heir, was entitled to pursue the issue before the apex court.

The Supreme Court's latest proceedings come months after it had refused to entertain a similar plea seeking the return of Netaji's mortal remains from Japan.

In March this year, the CJI Kant-led Bench had expressed its disinclination to entertain a petition filed by Ashish Ray, the grandnephew of Netaji.

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Ray, had then sought permission to withdraw the petition and informed the top court that Netaji's daughter would approach the apex court with a fresh plea.

During the hearing, Singhvi had submitted that Netaji had only one legal heir, Anita Bose Pfaff, and that she supported the plea seeking the return of his mortal remains. However, the CJI Kant-led Bench had observed that the legal heir herself was not the petitioner and should approach the Supreme Court directly if she wished to pursue the issue.

"But the heir is not the petitioner. The heir must come before us. She cannot fight behind the curtains," the apex had remarked.

It had also observed that it respected the sentiments of Netaji's family, while making it clear that the legal proceedings had to be initiated by the concerned heir.

The petition alleged that the Union government had failed to bring back Netaji's mortal remains preserved at the Renkoji Temple in Tokyo and sought directions for the remains to be brought to India so that his daughter could perform his last rites in the country.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya Venkatesan

I understand the sentimental value, but I wonder about the diplomatic implications with Japan. The Renkoji Temple has preserved those ashes with respect for decades. Maybe we should consider a respectful agreement rather than a legal battle. Just my two paise.

Amitabh Deshmukh

The Supreme Court's earlier observation was correct - the legal heir should directly approach the court. Now that Anita Bose Pfaff has done exactly that, I hope the government responds positively. Netaji deserves to be brought home, no matter the political sensitivity.

Melissa Carter

As an outsider, it's fascinating to see how India still honours its freedom fighters so deeply. I hope the government and Japan can reach an amicable solution that respects both the family's wishes and the temple's custodianship. It's a delicate international matter after all.

Kavya Nair

I honestly wonder why the government has been dragging its feet on this for so long. Every other country would have facilitated this long ago. It's not just about ashes - it's about our national pride and the unresolved mystery around Netaji's disappearance. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳

James Anderson

It's touching to see the daughter's emotional connection to her father's legacy. But I wonder if there's any scientific way to confirm those ashes are indeed his? Either way, I hope the Indian government respects the family's deep feelings and finds a way forward.

D

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked