SC Allows Jharkhand, Orissa Judges in Bengal Voter Roll Cleanup Drive

The Supreme Court has permitted judicial officers from the Jharkhand and Orissa High Courts to be deputed to West Bengal to help clear a massive backlog of voter claims and objections. This intervention addresses the Calcutta High Court's concern over nearly 80 lakh pending applications needing adjudication before the final electoral roll publication. The Court has allowed the deployment of additional civil judges and directed the Election Commission to bear all associated expenses. It also ruled that voters added in supplementary lists will be deemed part of the final roll published on February 28, 2026.

Key Points: SC Permits Judges from Neighbouring HCs for Bengal Voter Roll Revision

  • Expedite voter roll revision
  • Clear 80 lakh pending claims
  • Use judges from neighbouring HCs
  • ECI to bear all expenses
2 min read

SC permits deputation of officials from Jharkhand, Orissa High Courts in West Bengal SIR exercise

Supreme Court allows deputation of judicial officers from Jharkhand & Orissa HCs to West Bengal to clear 80 lakh pending voter claims before Feb 28 deadline.

"nearly 80 lakh applications require adjudication - Calcutta High Court communication"

New Delhi, Feb 24

The Supreme Court on Tuesday permitted judicial officers from the neighbouring High Courts of Jharkhand and Orissa to be deputed to West Bengal to expedite the adjudication of voter claims and objections arising from the ongoing Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in the poll-bound state.

A Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipin Pancholi issued the directions after the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court informed the Apex Court about the massive pendency of cases involving "logical discrepancy" and "unmapped category" voters.

As per the communication placed before the Top Court, nearly 80 lakh applications require adjudication, while only about 250 judicial officers, primarily District Judges and Additional District Judges, are currently engaged in the exercise.

The Calcutta High Court estimated that even if each officer disposes of 250 matters daily, the process would take around 80 days to conclude.

Taking note of the deadline for the final electoral roll scheduled for February 28, 2026, the CJI Kant-led Bench allowed the Calcutta High Court to additionally deploy Civil Judges (Senior Division) and Civil Judges (Junior Division) with at least three years of experience to assist in the SIR work.

It further permitted the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court to seek assistance from neighbouring High Courts if additional manpower is required.

The Supreme Court said that judicial officers, serving as well as retired, from the Jharkhand and Orissa High Courts may be deputed to West Bengal for the limited purpose of completing verification of pending claims.

It directed that expenses towards travel, boarding, lodging and honorarium of such officers would be borne by the Election Commission of India (ECI).

The CJI Kant-led Bench clarified that the ECI may proceed with publication of the final electoral roll on February 28, even if adjudication of certain cases remains pending.

Invoking its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court ordered that voters whose names are included in subsequent supplementary electoral lists would be deemed to be part of the final electoral roll published on February 28.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While the intent to clear the backlog is good, I'm concerned. Will officers from Jharkhand and Odisha be fully aware of West Bengal's local nuances and names? Voter verification needs local context. Hope proper training is given. 🤔
R
Rohit P
Finally, some decisive action! The Election Commission should have anticipated this workload and planned better. Now the SC has to step in. At least the expenses are on ECI, not the state. The February 2026 deadline seems far, but with 80 lakh cases, maybe it's not.
S
Sarah B
Interesting move. It shows the judiciary can be flexible and collaborative for administrative efficiency. Using Article 142 to ensure no voter is left out of the final roll due to pending adjudication is a pro-democracy step. Kudos to the bench.
V
Vikram M
This is a huge administrative challenge. 250 officers disposing 250 cases daily sounds like a factory target, not careful judicial work. Speed is important, but accuracy in voter lists is paramount. Hope quality isn't compromised.
K
Karthik V
Good initiative. Neighbouring states helping each other is the spirit of cooperative federalism. Also, involving retired officers is smart - they have the experience. Hope this sets a precedent for managing such large-scale exercises in other states too.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50