SC Seeks Govt Reply on Plea to Recognize AYUSH Doctors as Registered Practitioners

The Supreme Court has issued notices to the Union Ministries of Law, Health, and AYUSH on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking legal recognition for AYUSH doctors as 'registered medical practitioners'. The plea argues that the current law, the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act of 1954, unfairly restricts AYUSH practitioners from advertising treatments for serious ailments, even with truthful information. It contends this leads to public ignorance about available medications. The PIL also seeks the formation of an expert committee to review and update the law's schedule in line with modern scientific developments.

Key Points: SC Notice on Plea to Declare AYUSH Doctors as Registered Practitioners

  • SC notice to Law, Health & AYUSH ministries
  • PIL seeks legal parity for AYUSH doctors
  • Wants update to 1954 Drugs Act schedule
  • Aims to allow truthful medical ads
2 min read

SC notice to govt on PIL seeking AYUSH doctors be declared as registered medical practitioners

Supreme Court issues notice to Centre on PIL seeking legal parity for AYUSH doctors as 'registered medical practitioners' under a 1954 drug law.

"This blanket ban effectively stops the advertisement by them of the existence of medication for serious ailments, leading to widespread public ignorance of the drugs. - PIL plea"

New Delhi, January 12

The Supreme Court on Monday issued notices to Union Ministries of Law, Health and Ayush on a plea seeking a direction to declare AYUSH doctors as 'registered medical practitioners' under the law, like allopathic doctors.

A bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi sought a response from the ministries while issuing notices.

The PIL filed by one Nitin Upadhyay sought a direction to constitute an expert committee to review and update the schedule of a 1954 law, aimed at controlling the advertisement of drugs in certain cases in accordance with present-day scientific developments.

It sought a direction to declare that AYUSH doctors are also covered under section 2(cc) of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, as 'registered medical practitioners'.

The petition stated, "The Act was enacted to protect the public from false and misleading medical advertisements. However, Section 3(d) places a complete ban on advertisements relating to certain diseases and conditions."

Section 3 of the Act deals with the prohibition of the advertisement of certain drugs for the treatment of certain diseases and disorders.

AYUSH doctors and other genuine non-allopathic registered medical practitioners are not covered under the exception of section 14 of the Act, it said.

"This blanket ban effectively stops the advertisement by them of the existence of medication for serious ailments, leading to widespread public ignorance of the drugs," said the plea.

The petition further said advertisements relating to drugs and remedies, when truthful, scientifically backed, and non-deceptive, constitute legitimate dissemination of information to consumers and patients.

The PIL also sought a direction to the Centre to constitute an expert committee to review, revise and update the schedule of the DMR Act in accordance with present-day scientific developments and evidence-based medical knowledge.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Finally! The law needs to catch up with reality. In our village, the AYUSH doctor is the first point of contact. If they are 'registered medical practitioners', it will bring more accountability and also protect patients from false ads. Good PIL.
S
Sarah B
While integration is good, we must be careful. The petition talks about allowing advertisements for serious ailments. This could be a slippery slope. Any advertisement, from any system of medicine, must be backed by rigorous, peer-reviewed scientific evidence. The expert committee's role will be crucial.
A
Aman W
Recognition is one thing, but the standards of education and practice across AYUSH colleges vary wildly. First, standardise the education and ensure quality control. Then give them the title. Otherwise, it's just a label without meaning.
K
Kavya N
Our traditional medicine systems are a treasure. This legal parity is long overdue. It will also help in creating a more integrated healthcare system where a patient can choose based on need. Jai AYUSH! 🇮🇳
V
Varun X
The 1954 Act is ancient. Updating it with modern scientific knowledge is the need of the hour. Whether allopathy or Ayurveda, truth in advertising should be the only criteria. The Supreme Court taking it up is a positive sign.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50