SC Rejects Plea Against Vande Mataram Advisory, Calls It "Premature"

The Supreme Court dismissed a plea challenging a government circular regarding the singing of 'Vande Mataram' at official functions, deeming the petition premature. The court emphasized that the notification is purely advisory and carries no mandatory compliance or penalties. The petitioner's counsel argued that the advisory could lead to indirect social pressure, compelling conformity. The ruling comes amid discussions on the song's historical role, as highlighted recently by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Key Points: SC Dismisses Plea Against Centre's Vande Mataram Circular

  • SC says petition is premature
  • Circular is advisory, not mandatory
  • No penal consequences for non-compliance
  • Petitioner feared indirect social compulsion
  • Song's historical significance highlighted
3 min read

SC declines plea against Centre's 'Vande Mataram' circular

Supreme Court declines challenge to advisory on singing Vande Mataram, stating the circular is not mandatory and has no penal consequences.

"Patriotism cannot be compelled - Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde"

New Delhi, March 25

The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to entertain a plea challenging the Centre's recent circular regarding the singing of the national song 'Vande Mataram' at official and public functions, observing that the petition was "premature" as the guidelines do not mandate compliance or prescribe any penal consequences.

A Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi, remarked that the January 28 notification issued by the Union government was merely advisory in nature.

During the hearing, the CJI Kant-led Bench repeatedly underlined that the circular does not make the singing of 'Vande Mataram' mandatory. "We will hear all this when there are penal consequences or when it is made mandatory. This notification is advisory. No penal consequences, also," the apex court remarked.

Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing for the petitioner, argued that even in the absence of explicit penalties, the advisory could create a situation of indirect compulsion.

He argued that individuals refusing to sing or stand in respect of the national song may face social pressure or discrimination. "There is always a burden on those who refuse. In the garb of an advisory, people can be compelled to conform," Hegde submitted, adding that "patriotism cannot be compelled" and that the Constitution must protect individual conscience.

However, the CJI Kant-led Bench said that the apprehensions raised by the petitioner regarding possible discrimination were speculative at this stage. "If there are any penal consequences or instances of discrimination, you are free to approach this Court," the apex court said, while dismissing the plea.

The petition had challenged the Centre's circular, which suggested that 'Vande Mataram' may be sung in educational institutions and public functions.

The government has maintained that the guideline is intended to promote respect for the national song and is not enforceable by law. The issue also comes amid renewed focus on the historical and cultural significance of 'Vande Mataram'.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently invoked the "enduring spirit" of 'Vande Mataram' during a discussion in the Lok Sabha marking 150 years of its composition.

He described it as a unifying force that played a pivotal role during India's freedom struggle and continues to inspire generations.

Composed by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay in 1875 and later included in his novel Anandamath, 'Vande Mataram' was set to tune by Rabindranath Tagore and first presented at the 1896 session of the Indian National Congress.

The song went on to become a powerful rallying cry during the independence movement, resonating with leaders such as Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bhagat Singh and Subhas Chandra Bose. In 1950, India's first President, Rajendra Prasad, accorded 'Vande Mataram' the status of the national song.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sanjay N
I understand the petitioner's concern about indirect social pressure. In our society, not participating can sometimes lead to being labelled. The Court is right to say come back if actual discrimination happens, but the fear is real.
P
Priyanka N
Vande Mataram is our national song, a symbol of our freedom struggle. Promoting it in schools and public functions is a good way to connect our youth with history. As long as it's not forced, what's the harm?
A
Aman W
The court has made a technical, legal decision. The petition *was* premature. But Senior Advocate Hegde has a point - an "advisory" from the Centre carries a lot of weight. Principals and officials might feel pressured to implement it strictly.
M
Meera T
True patriotism comes from the heart. You cannot force someone to sing. The spirit of the song is what matters. I'm glad the Court clarified it's not mandatory. Let's focus on its beautiful message of unity.
D
David E
Interesting to follow this from abroad. The balance between promoting national symbols and protecting individual freedom is a delicate one. The SC seems to be asking for evidence of actual harm before stepping in.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50