Supreme Court Sets April 7 Hearing for Landmark Sabarimala Review Case

The Supreme Court has scheduled the commencement of hearings for the Sabarimala review case before a nine-judge Constitution Bench starting April 7. The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, has set a detailed timeline aiming to conclude arguments by April 22, with all parties required to file written submissions by March 14. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the court that the Union government is supporting the review petitions against the 2018 judgment that allowed women of all ages to enter the temple. The hearing will also address broader referenced issues concerning the entry of Muslim women into mosques and the rights of Parsi women in Fire Temples.

Key Points: SC Sabarimala Review Hearing from April 7 by 9-Judge Bench

  • 9-judge bench to hear case from April 7
  • Written submissions due by March 14
  • Government supports review petitions
  • Hearing to conclude by April 22
3 min read

SC to commence hearing Sabarimala review case on entry of all women from April 7

Supreme Court schedules final hearing on Sabarimala review from April 7. A 9-judge bench to decide on women's entry and other religious rights issues.

"We are supporting the review. - Solicitor General Tushar Mehta"

New Delhi, Feb 16

A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will commence hearing the issues referred in the Sabarimala review matter from April 7.

A Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, while dealing with a batch of review petitions against its September 2018 judgment permitting entry of women of all ages into the Lord Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala, fixed a detailed schedule for the conclusion of arguments by April 22.

It directed all parties to file their written submissions on or before March 14.

"Objections were earlier raised regarding maintainability of the reference, which was conclusively determined by this court in February 2020, whereby the 9-judge Bench opined that this Court can refer questions to a larger Bench even in review.

Accordingly, the issue of the maintainability of reference has attained finality and need not detain us at this stage," said the Bench, also comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi.

Referring to the order dated February 10, 2020, the apex court added that seven questions of law had already been framed for consideration by a nine-judge Bench.

"In this light, and with a view to finally laying to rest the questions of law that remain pending in these matters, we direct the parties to file their written submissions on or before 14.03.2026," the order stated.

As per the schedule fixed by the Supreme Court, parties supporting the review petitions will be heard from April 7 to April 9. Those opposing the review will advance arguments from April 14 to April 16.

ejoinder submissions, if any, will be heard on April 21, followed by final submissions by the amicus curiae, which are expected to conclude on April 22.

"The parties shall adhere to the above schedule. The nodal counsels in consultation with arguing counsel of the parties shall prepare the internal arrangement so that oral submissions from both sides can be heard within the stipulated timeline," the CJI Kant-led Bench directed.

During the hearing, the top court remarked that the Constitution Bench proceedings were "more important than anything else" and asked both sides to keep their calendars clear for the scheduled dates.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, the Centre's second-highest law officer, informed the apex court that the Union government was supporting the review petitions.

"We are supporting the review," SG Mehta submitted.

The top court appointed advocate-on-Record Shivam Singh to assist amicus curiae K. Parmeswar and to prepare the written submissions reflecting the stand taken by all parties.

The composition of the nine-judge Constitution Bench will be notified separately by the Chief Justice of India, who is the master of the roster, through an administrative order.

Apart from the Sabarimala issue, the matters tagged with the reference include questions relating to the entry of Muslim women into mosques and dargahs, rights of Parsi women to enter Fire Temples after marrying outside the community, the validity of the practice of excommunication, and the legality of female genital mutilation in the Dawoodi Bohra community.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Finally, a detailed schedule! This issue has been hanging for too long. The court is right to treat this as 'more important than anything else'. Our judiciary's time is precious, and a final decision is needed for social harmony.
A
Arjun K
Interesting that the Centre is supporting the review. While I believe in progressive values, matters of faith are deeply personal. The court should be careful not to be seen as interfering in religious practices without overwhelming constitutional reason.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, it's fascinating to see how India's secular constitution navigates these complex religious issues. The fact that they're clubbing it with questions about mosques and Fire Temples shows they're looking for a consistent principle. Good move.
M
Meera T
With all due respect to the Supreme Court, I feel the 2018 judgment was correct. Equality before the law is non-negotiable. Age-old traditions can evolve. We can't have different rules for women's entry in different places of worship. This review feels like a step back.
V
Vikram M
The logistical planning is impressive—written submissions by March, hearings in April. Hope the arguments are based on law and not just emotion. Lord Ayyappa's devotees have a right to practice their faith as per the *acharams*. Jai Ayyappa! 🙌

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50