Sanjeev Sanyal proposes "Transparency of Rules Act' to simplify regulations, improve ease of doing business
New Delhi, May 19
Sanjeev Sanyal, member of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, on Tuesday proposed for the enactment of a "Transparency of Rules Act" to make all norms, regulations and citizen-facing requirements easily accessible through a dedicated centralised portal.
Sanyal, said Transparency of Rules Act can help simplify regulations, improve transparency in governance and significantly enhance ease of doing business in the country by consolidating complex rules and reducing regulatory opacity.
"Transparency of Rules Act, and the idea of this is very simple, and it will cost almost no money to do, but it will require public pressure to get it done, because it will remove from the bureaucracy a major problem, which is what are the rules I am supposed to follow," Sanyal said while addressing the ASSOCHAM'S India Business Reforms Summit 2026.
He said most governance reforms do not necessarily require major legislative overhauls and can often be achieved through process simplification and administrative streamlining.
Citing reforms in voluntary closure of companies under the Companies Act, Sanyal said the government reduced the average time taken to strike off companies from nearly 500 days in 2021-22 to around 60 days through the C-PACE platform established by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
"This, by the way, is the fastest in the world. Faster than Singapore," he said.
According to Sanyal, the earlier system suffered from delays because No Objection Certificates (NOCs) and approvals were processed sequentially, there were no fixed timelines and companies often faced procedural bottlenecks despite there being no objections to closure.
He said the new digital mechanism now automatically processes applications, seeks approvals electronically and grants deemed approvals if departments fail to respond within specified timelines.
Referring to reforms under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), Sanyal said the government also simplified voluntary liquidation procedures for large companies by introducing standardised checklists and clearer compliance frameworks.
He said the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) issued clarification circulars and amended regulations to remove unnecessary ambiguity around NOCs and compliance requirements.
Sanyal further said the government is reviewing outdated compliances and state-created bottlenecks that adversely affect businesses.
Citing examples, he said mandatory mediation in commercial disputes often adds unnecessary delays and costs despite very few disputes being resolved through the process.
He also flagged restrictions on branding and multidisciplinary partnerships for Indian consultancy firms, saying such rules have limited the emergence of large Indian professional services firms despite India being a major services-exporting country.
The economist added that India is significantly expanding its patent processing ecosystem by recruiting additional patent examiners and controllers to support future growth in innovation and research.
He said the government aims to build sufficient capacity by 2030 to handle a much larger volume of patent applications and ensure that India's R&D ecosystem is not constrained by administrative delays.
Explaining the broader objective behind the proposed Transparency of Rules Act, Sanyal said laws and regulations should be consolidated and presented transparently rather than being scattered across thousands of circulars and notifications.
Citing the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as an example, he said the central bank replaced 9,446 circulars with 244 master circulars in November 2025, helping improve clarity and reduce opacity in the regulatory framework.
— ANI
Reader Comments
Good proposal but I'm skeptical about implementation. We've had so many 'simplification' initiatives in the past that ended up adding more layers. The real test will be whether state governments also adopt this transparency - many business hurdles are at the state level. Also, making rules accessible is one thing, but getting bureaucrats to follow timelines is another. Deemed approval if departments don't respond sounds great in theory, but in practice it might lead to more litigation.
As someone who runs a consulting firm, I completely agree with Sanyal's point about barriers for Indian professional services companies. The restrictions on branding and multidisciplinary partnerships are absurd. We have such talented professionals but our own regulations prevent them from scaling up globally. This Transparency Act could be the push we need. Also, the C-PACE platform reducing company closure time to 60 days is impressive - faster than Singapore! Who would have thought? 🇮🇳
This is a classic case of 'the devil is in the details'. Transparency of rules is necessary but not sufficient. What about the implementation machinery? What about training for government officials who interpret these rules? We also need to address corruption and discretion in application of rules. The idea of consolidating circulars is welcome, but without addressing systemic issues, we're just putting lipstick on a pig. Still, credit to Sanyal for raising this at the right forum.
As a startup founder, I can tell you regulatory clarity is everything. We wasted 6 months trying to figure out if our business model needed multiple licenses - each government department gave us different answers. If the Transparency of Rules Act can provide clarity upfront, it will save lakhs of crores in compliance costs. And the patent processing expansion is equally important - we are a nation of innovators but slow patent approvals kill motivation. Hope this actually happens! 🤞
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.