Rule of law under great challenge in South China Sea: Philippines envoy
New Delhi, July 22
Philippines Ambassador to India, Josel F Ignacio, said on Wednesday that the rule of law is under "great challenge" in the South China Sea. In an interview with, Ignacio said that the Philippines continues to face challenges illegally in the waters where they have legitimate maritime entitlements. He also expressed the Philippines readiness to resolve the dispute based on the rule of law.
"The South China Sea has been a challenging area for several years. The aspiration for us as the Philippines and for ASEAN and I'm sure for many other countries is that oceans and including the South China Sea should be areas, where prosperity and peace and security should reign. But, the realities right now is that unfortunately in the South China Sea, rule of law is under great challenge. The UNCLOS, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, is very clear as to what the entitlements of the literal states are in those waters," said Ignacio on the current security situation in the South China Sea.
"These entitlements with respect to the Philippines have been confirmed and affirmed by the ruling of the Arbitrary Tribunal of 2016. But, unfortunately, we continue to be challenged illegally and without legitimate basis in those waters where our legitimate maritime entitlements and our sovereignty is day to day under assault. So, that's an unfortunate situation, but the Philippines, we are resolved to seek a peaceful dispute resolution based on the rule of law, and that has always been our priority," he added.
His remarks come a day after the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) dismissed the China Coast Guard's (CCG) allegation that Philippine boats had deliberately rammed one of its patrol vessels near the Second Thomas Shoal in the South China Sea, describing the claims as "false and misleading".
The AFP raised questions over China Coast Guard RHIB operating within close proximity of BRP Sierra Madre, terming its presence as "an unlawful intrusion into an area where the Philippines exercises sovereign rights under international law."
Ignacio stated that China continues its claim to the South China Sea through the nine or 10-dash line. However, he noted that the historic rights have ended after the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), to which China itself is a party.
"China asserts historic claims to the South China Sea and by that, usually it's taken to mean the nine or 10-dash line and everything within it. But, historic rights have been extinguished by the Convention on the Law of the Sea. What states have now are entitlements defined by the Convention of the Law of the Sea by UNCLOS, to which China itself is a party and that means a 12 nautical mile territorial sea, 12 nautical mile contiguous zone. I mean, just not to be technical about it, 200 nautical mile EEZ, etc and in the Philippines case, again, that has been affirmed by the Arbitral Tribunal," he mentioned.
"So, our EEZ is clear in those areas. And those incidents in the news yesterday or two days ago pertain to an area that's technically what's called a low tide elevation, which under international law and the UNCLOS is not subject to any sovereignty claim and a foreign coast guard has no business being there because that's entirely well within Philippine EEZ and only the Philippines has that kind of there in that area and we're entitled to do what we want there," he added.
— IANS
Reader Comments
Honestly, I'm tired of hearing the same rhetoric from all sides. Every country claims their rights under UNCLOS but uses it selectively. Yes, China's 10-dash line is problematic but haven't we seen similar territorial disputes elsewhere? The real solution is dialogue, not media statements. 🤷♀️
As an Indian, I fully support the Philippines position. China needs to respect international law like everyone else. Their 'historic rights' argument doesn't hold water - that's like us claiming the entire Indian Ocean because our ancestors sailed there! The 2016 arbitration ruling was clear and binding.
Interesting to hear the Philippine perspective from India. Both nations share concerns about maritime security and freedom of navigation. The key question is: will ASEAN remain united on this, or will economic ties with China break the consensus? India's Act East policy should prioritize supporting ASEAN unity here.
I agree with the ambassador's concerns, but India should be careful not to get dragged into a direct confrontation with China over this. We have our own border issues with China to manage. Let's support the Philippines diplomatically but avoid provoking Beijing unnecessarily. Diplomacy, not sabre-rattling. 🇮🇳🇵🇭
The arrogance of China in ignoring the 2016 arbitration award is appalling. They talk about 'win-win' cooperation but trample on international law when it suits them. India has experienced similar bullying at the border. Time we worked with like-minded nations like the Philippines, Japan, Australia, and US to uphold the rules-based order. 💯