Rubio Tells Congress Trump Wants to Negotiate, Not Seize, Greenland

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has told congressional leaders that the Trump administration's objective is to pressure Denmark into negotiations over Greenland, not to seize it militarily. The briefing sought to calm fears following forceful public statements from the White House, which has framed acquiring the Arctic island as a vital national security need to counter Russian and Chinese influence. However, mixed signals persist, with top advisers not ruling out military action, alarming NATO allies who warn such a move would effectively end the alliance. Denmark has responded by proposing expanded US basing rights in Greenland while polls show most Greenlanders oppose becoming part of the United States.

Key Points: Rubio: Trump Aims to Buy Greenland, Not Seize It Militarily

  • Rubio downplays military seizure fears
  • White House frames Greenland as security priority
  • NATO allies warn an attack would end the alliance
  • Denmark proposes expanded US basing rights
  • Most Greenlanders oppose becoming part of the US
3 min read

Rubio tells lawmakers Trump wants to buy Greenland, not seize it: Report

Secretary of State Rubio briefs lawmakers that the US seeks to negotiate Greenland's purchase from Denmark, downplaying fears of military action.

"nobody's going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland. - Stephen Miller"

Washington, Jan 7

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has told US lawmakers that President Donald Trump aims to acquire Greenland through negotiations with Denmark, and that recent tough rhetoric from the White House does not signal an imminent US military move, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

Rubio made the remarks during a closed-door briefing with congressional leaders, where he sought to downplay concerns that the Trump administration was preparing to use force to take control of the Arctic island, people familiar with the discussion told the Journal.

According to the report, Rubio said the administration's objective is to pressure Denmark into negotiations over Greenland's future, rather than to seize the territory militarily. The comments come amid increasingly forceful public statements by Trump and senior aides, who have refused to rule out the use of force.

The White House has repeatedly framed Greenland as a national security priority. White Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump believes acquiring Greenland is vital for US national security and for deterring rivals in the Arctic, adding that the president is considering "a range of options" to pursue that goal.

Trump has argued that US control of the island would help counter Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic and secure access to critical minerals.

Rubio's briefing followed questions from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer about whether the administration was considering military action not only in Greenland, but also in other places such as Mexico. Rubio's comments appeared aimed at calming those fears, the report said.

However, the administration has sent mixed signals. Stephen Miller, one of Trump's closest advisers, said in a television interview that he would not rule out military action over Greenland, remarking that "nobody's going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland."

Trump himself has been blunt. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, he said the United States "needs Greenland from the standpoint of national security," and suggested that US and European leaders understand that position.

The prospect of US military action has alarmed allies. NATO members have warned that an American attack on Greenland - a self-governing territory within Denmark, a NATO ally - would effectively end the alliance.

European officials told the Journal they have seen no concrete signs that the United States is preparing an invasion. Still, fear of aggressive American action has spread across Europe, prompting six leaders to join Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen in calling for "collective work" with the US on Arctic security.

Denmark has responded by proposing expanded US basing rights in Greenland and offering greater access to mining, while also pledging billions of dollars for Arctic defence infrastructure.

Polls cited in the report show most Greenlanders oppose becoming part of the United States, adding another layer of complexity to Trump's push.

Rubio's comments came during a broader briefing on the US operation to remove Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, which has heightened concerns among lawmakers and allies that Trump is increasingly willing to use force to reshape US foreign policy.

While Rubio sought to reassure Congress, the Journal noted that Trump continues to keep all options on the table - including military ones - as he presses Denmark to the negotiating table over the world's largest island.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting geopolitical move. The Arctic is becoming a new strategic frontier, much like how the Himalayas are for us. Securing resources and positioning is key for any major power in the 21st century.
P
Priya S
The most important line here is that most Greenlanders oppose this. Why is no one listening to the people who actually live there? Reminds me of how some powers ignore local sentiments in our region too. Self-determination matters.
R
Rohit P
Mixed signals from the White House are creating unnecessary tension with allies. A strong nation doesn't need to bully smaller countries. India's foreign policy, despite our size, has always emphasized respect and dialogue. There's a lesson here.
M
Michael C
From an Indian perspective, the mention of countering Chinese influence is notable. The US sees the Arctic as another theater for that competition. India must watch this space carefully and safeguard its own strategic interests, especially with our growing presence in the Indo-Pacific.
K
Kavya N
All this talk of "national security" to justify expansionism. Sounds familiar from history books. Denmark's response of offering basing rights and mining access seems like a sensible, diplomatic compromise. Hope cooler heads prevail.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50