Rubio says Iran ready to discuss nuclear curbs
Washington, June 2
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday that Iran has agreed to discuss parts of its nuclear programme that it had previously refused to negotiate, raising the prospect of new talks after recent U.S. military action against Tehran.
Testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Rubio said Iran's military capabilities had been significantly weakened and that Tehran was now willing to engage on issues it had long kept off the table.
"There is the prospect before us, which could happen today, it could happen tomorrow, it could happen next week, that, for the first time certainly in my memory, they have agreed to negotiate aspects of their nuclear programme that just a month ago, just a year ago, they were refusing to even mention, much less enter into discussions about," Rubio said.
Rubio appeared before lawmakers to defend President Donald Trump's proposed State Department budget. Much of the hearing focused on Iran, the Strait of Hormuz, and the administration's broader foreign policy agenda.
The secretary defended recent U.S. military operations against Iran, saying they had sharply reduced Tehran's ability to shield its nuclear programme behind conventional military power.
"Iran's desire to build a nuclear weapon was going to be effectuated behind a conventional shield," Rubio said.
He said "Operation Epic Fury" had achieved its objectives by damaging Iran's missile production capabilities and military infrastructure.
"Operation Epic Fury ... was highly successful in achieving its military objectives," Rubio said.
Rubio argued that Iran had sought to build a vast arsenal of missiles, drones, and naval assets that would deter any outside action against its nuclear programme.
"The president chose to act to deny them that point of immunity," he said.
The secretary delivered one of the administration's strongest assessments yet of the damage inflicted on Iran's military.
"Today, there is no Iranian navy. There is no such thing," Rubio said. "There is no Iranian navy. It lies at the bottom of the ocean."
Committee Chairman Jim Risch praised the administration's approach towards Iran and thanked Rubio for his role in the operation.
Rubio said a ceasefire had been reached after the military campaign but accused Tehran of failing to fulfil a commitment to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
"They would reopen the straits. They did not," he said.
The United States responded by imposing, as Rubio described, an effective blockade on Iranian shipping.
"The cost to Iran every single day in lost revenue is in the hundreds of millions of dollars," he said.
The Opposition Democratic Senators challenged the administration's handling of the crisis. Senator Jeanne Shaheen said the State Department has failed to adequately consult Congress on decisions involving Iran and questioned the broader impact of the conflict.
Rubio acknowledged that negotiations with Tehran remained difficult and often relied on intermediaries.
"That is not a guarantee that ultimately it will lead to a deal that's acceptable to the Senate or acceptable to the American people," Rubio said. "But we will be able to engage them in a process to truly test the proposition of how far they're willing to go."
— IANS
Reader Comments
As someone who follows geopolitics closely, I find Rubio's statements quite concerning. He says Iran's navy "lies at the bottom of the ocean" - this is incredibly provocative language from a Secretary of State. The Strait of Hormuz situation affects global oil prices, and India imports a significant amount of our crude from that region. If there's instability, we'll feel it at the petrol pump. 🙏
Rubio sounds like he's trying to spin a narrative of success, but let's be honest - Iran has been playing this game for decades. They're smart negotiators, they know how to drag things out. The fact that they're "agreeing to discuss" doesn't mean they'll actually change anything. The US needs to be careful not to repeat the mistakes of the JCPOA era. Also, love how the Democrats are questioning this - bipartisan oversight is crucial.
From an Indian perspective, we should be worried about this whole situation. The US is claiming to have destroyed Iran's navy, but that just creates a power vacuum. China will step in, Russia is already there, and we're left wondering what happens to our energy security. India should be having its own diplomatic channels with Tehran right now, not just relying on American narratives. Jai Hind! ✊
I'm skeptical about this entire "Iran is ready to talk" narrative. Rubio is testifying before Senate to justify a military operation that cost billions of dollars and probably many lives. The blockade on Iranian shipping - isn't that just collective punishment? The Yemen situation is already a humanitarian disaster because of similar tactics. India has always advocated for dialogue over military action - maybe the US should learn from us. 🙏
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.