Rs 3 Fuel Hike Marginal as Oil Firms Absorb Rs 1,000 Crore Daily Losses

The government has announced a marginal Rs 3 per litre hike in petrol and diesel prices, which is a fraction of the huge losses oil firms are absorbing. Public sector oil companies are currently bearing daily losses of nearly Rs 1,000 crore due to global crude prices above $100 a barrel. The Centre aims to protect consumers from the full impact of external shocks to avoid widespread inflationary consequences across the economy. Officials noted India has zero control over geopolitical developments driving the surge, such as the US-Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz tensions.

Key Points: Rs 3 Fuel Hike Marginal Amid Rs 1,000 Crore Daily Losses

  • Rs 3 fuel hike is marginal vs Rs 26-82 per litre under-recoveries
  • Oil firms absorbing Rs 1,000 crore daily losses
  • Global crude above $100/barrel due to West Asia tensions
  • Govt shields consumers to avoid inflation and protect demand
3 min read

Rs 3 hike in fuel prices marginal as oil firms absorbing losses of Rs 1,000 crore a day: Top official

Govt says Rs 3 per litre petrol/diesel hike is marginal as oil firms absorb Rs 1,000 crore daily losses amid global crude above $100/barrel.

"India has zero control over these geopolitical developments - Top official"

New Delhi, May 15

The marginal Rs 3 per litre hike in petrol and diesel prices announced by the government is a mere drop in the bucket compared to the huge losses that the public sector oil companies are absorbing due to soaring global prices of crude oil, which have crossed $100 a barrel, a senior official said on Friday.

The small increase reflects the Centre's broader strategy of protecting consumers from the full impact of the global oil shock, the official said.

Sources said petrol under-recoveries are currently estimated at around Rs 26 per litre, while diesel under-recoveries are as high as Rs 82 per litre. In that context, officials indicated that even a modest Rs 3 hike would account for only a fraction of the financial burden currently being borne by government-owned Indian Oil, BPCL, and HPCL.

According to top sources, the state-run oil marketing companies, along with the government, are currently absorbing losses of nearly Rs 1,000 crore every day to prevent a sharp increase in retail fuel prices despite the surge in global crude oil prices triggered by escalating tensions in West Asia.

The government's message, sources said, is clear: it does not want Indian consumers to bear the full burden of rising global crude prices through steep increases in pump prices.

Officials also said a sharp fuel price hike would have widespread inflationary consequences across the economy by increasing transportation costs, pushing up food prices, and hurting household budgets at a sensitive time for domestic demand.

The Centre is also shielding the country's agriculture sector from the global price shocks. Sources pointed out that the government is already bearing a fertiliser subsidy burden estimated at nearly Rs 2.25 lakh crore to protect farmers from rising input costs.

Officials said the broader policy approach currently is to focus on reducing fuel consumption gradually and improving energy efficiency rather than imposing sudden price shocks on consumers. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, sources added, has been pushing for lower fuel consumption patterns and reduced import dependence instead of aggressive retail price hikes.

The concerns stem from India's growing import burden amid elevated crude oil prices. Government sources described the situation as a "massive twin drain" caused by rising oil and gold imports. India's annual crude oil import bill is estimated at around Rs 12-15 lakh crore, with every $10 increase in crude prices adding nearly $13-14 billion to the country's import burden.

Officials pointed out that the current surge in oil prices is driven by the escalating US-Iran conflict and the choking of the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 per cent of the world's energy exports transit during normal times.

"India has zero control over these geopolitical developments," a source said, adding that the government is consciously trying to avoid transferring the entire external shock onto consumers.

Officials also argued that India's macroeconomic fundamentals are far stronger than during the 2012-13 crisis period. The current account deficit remains below 1.5 per cent of GDP compared with nearly 5 per cent during the earlier crisis, while inflation remains relatively contained despite global volatility.

Indian Oil officials said the company's refineries are currently operating round the clock at their maximum capacity to ensure there is no shortage of fuel.

The country has 60 days of crude stocks, which is the maximum required by the refineries, so there is no problem at present as far as production of fuels is concerned, an official added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
I understand the government wants to protect us from the full impact of global oil prices, but Rs 3 is too little. It will hardly reduce the losses. The real issue is our dependence on imported oil. We need to push harder for electric vehicles and renewable energy. The government's focus on reducing consumption is good, but the pace is too slow.
A
Arjun K
At least they're not passing the entire burden to us like in 2012-13! The government is bearing Rs 1,000 crore daily loss - that's massive. And they're also subsidising fertilisers for farmers. We need to appreciate that the Modi government is trying to balance inflation control with global realities. The Strait of Hormuz situation is scary. 🇮🇳
S
Sneha F
The article says under-recoveries are Rs 26 for petrol and Rs 82 for diesel! That means they're selling diesel at a huge loss. But why not differentiate between petrol and diesel? Petrol is used more by private cars, diesel by transport and agriculture. Maybe they could have increased petrol more than diesel? Just a thought...
V
Vikram M
I'm a small business owner and every rupee hike hits my logistics costs. Rs 3 may seem small to the government, but it adds up for us. The article says they're avoiding 'sharp increases' - but a series of 'marginal' hikes will hurt equally over time. Why not have a transparent pricing formula instead of this uncertainty? 🤔
A
Ananya R
Good that they're protecting farmers with fertiliser subsidies. But the common man is also struggling.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50