Report raises concerns over alleged Uyghur forced labour links in Pop Mart supply chain
Washington DC, April 27
A report by The New York Times, drawing on information from the Campaign for Uyghurs, has raised concerns over alleged links between products made by Pop Mart and forced labour in China's Uyghur region, according to a CFU press release.
The report focuses on Pop Mart's widely popular collectable toy line, including its "Labubu" dolls, and alleges that materials used in their production may be sourced from cotton originating in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, also referred to as East Turkistan by activists. CFU claims that over 90 per cent of China's cotton is produced in this region, where allegations of forced labour and human rights violations against Uyghurs have been widely reported.
"Credible evidence suggests that Pop Mart used Xinjiang cotton linked to Uyghur forced labour for its products entering the US, one of its biggest markets, in a blatant disregard for U.S. law and international human rights order," said Rushan Abbas, Founder and Executive Director of CFU.
According to the press release, CFU said it received information from anonymous sources regarding Pop Mart's supply chain practices. After reviewing and verifying the material, the organisation submitted a complaint through the US Customs and Border Protection's Forced Labour Allegation Portal in August 2025 and coordinated with The New York Times in bringing attention to the issue.
The concerns are framed within the context of the Uyghur Forced Labour Prevention Act (UFLPA), which presumes that goods produced wholly or partially in the Uyghur region are made with forced labour and are therefore prohibited from entry into the United States. CFU alleged that Pop Mart has not provided sufficient transparency regarding its supply chain, including traceability documentation or evidence of compliance with the law.
The New York Times report also cited reactions from US lawmakers.
John Moolenaar, chair of the House Select Committee on China, described the allegations as "unsurprising and unacceptable", while Christopher H Smith, co-chair of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, said the company must demonstrate that its products sold in the U.S. are not linked to forced labour.
The CFU press release further referenced past actions by Pop Mart, including its response to decisions by Adidas China related to Xinjiang cotton.
According to the statement, Pop Mart had criticised Adidas China for what it described as "baseless" allegations regarding human rights concerns in the region, which CFU says indicates a willingness to engage with suppliers sourcing cotton from Xinjiang.
Rushan Abbas also highlighted personal concerns, referencing the case of her sister, Gulshan Abbas, who she said disappeared into China's prison system several years ago. She alleged that individuals like her sister could be part of the forced labour system tied to cotton production.
CFU has called on the US Department of Homeland Security and the Forced Labour Enforcement Task Force to add Pop Mart to the UFLPA Entity List, which would block its products from entering the US market until the company demonstrates a transparent and verified supply chain free from forced labour.
The organisation also urged retailers, online platforms, and consumers to halt purchases of Pop Mart products, emphasising the need for enforcement of existing laws.
— ANI
Reader Comments
I have mixed feelings. India also faces labor issues in some sectors, but we try to improve. The US should investigate properly, but these reports often rely on "anonymous sources" and activists with clear agendas. Pop Mart should provide transparency, but the US law presuming guilt without proof is problematic. 😕
Labubu dolls are super popular in India too now, my niece has one! But if there's even a chance of forced labor, consumers should know. That said, I find it suspicious that this report comes now, when US-China tensions are high. The New York Times has been pushing anti-China stories for years.
As someone who works in supply chain, traceability is complex. Cotton from Xinjiang is widely used globally. If the US is serious, they need to help companies audit their supply chains, not just ban products. But yes, human rights are important. India has similar issues with bonded labor in some sectors—we need to be careful before pointing fingers.
The US always uses "human rights" to target Chinese companies. Where was this concern when they were buying from Bangladesh or Vietnam? This is pure politics. Pop Mart should cooperate, but I doubt the allegations. China has strict labor laws and has improved working conditions drastically.
My cousin is hooked on Pop Mart blind boxes! But after reading this, I'm worried. The report mentions the activist's sister disappeared—that's serious. But I also know China denies these allegations strongly. It's hard to know the truth. I wish companies would just label their materials clearly so consumers can decide. 🎭
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.