South Korea fines top banks $183.7M for mortgage loan collusion

South Korea's Fair Trade Commission has fined four major commercial banks a combined 272 billion won for colluding on real estate loan-to-value ratios. The banks—Shinhan, Woori, Hana, and KB Kookmin—exchanged sensitive business information to align their lending limits and reduce competition. This practice, controlling about 60% of the mortgage market, particularly harmed small businesses and limited consumer choice. The case is the first application of a revised fair trade law banning anti-competitive information exchange.

Key Points: S. Korea Fines 4 Major Banks $183.7M for Collusion

  • 272 billion won fine on four banks
  • Collusion on mortgage loan limits
  • First use of revised fair trade law
  • Harmed SME and small business access
  • Controlled 60% of mortgage market
2 min read

Regulator slaps $183.7 million fine on 4 major S. Korean banks

South Korea's antitrust regulator imposes a 272 billion won fine on Shinhan, Woori, Hana, and KB Kookmin banks for colluding on real estate lending limits.

"The four major banks repeatedly exchanged detailed information on their LTV ratios over a long period whenever necessary. - Lee Sun-mi, FTC"

Seoul, Jan 21

The antitrust regulator here said on Wednesday that it has imposed a combined fine of 272 billion won on the country's four major commercial banks for allegedly colluding on real estate lending limits tied to loan-to-value ratios.

The banks -- Shinhan Bank, Woori Bank, Hana Bank and KB Kookmin Bank -- are accused of exchanging internal documents related to LTV ratios and coordinating their lending limits, a practice that restricted competition in the mortgage loan market, according to the Fair Trade Commission (FTC), reports Yonhap news agency.

The LTV ratio is a key regulatory tool used to curb household debt by limiting how much borrowers can take out in loans based on the value of their property used as collateral.

"Between a minimum of 736 cases and a maximum of 7,500 cases, the four major banks repeatedly exchanged detailed information on their LTV ratios over a long period whenever necessary," said Lee Sun-mi, a senior FTC official.

The information sharing allowed the banks to reduce uncertainty about competitors' business strategies and avoid competition on LTV ratios, enabling them to generate stable operating profits, the FTC said.

Because the four major banks account for about 60 percent of the country's real estate mortgage loan market, the similarity in their LTV ratios limited consumers' ability to choose among lenders, the watchdog added.

The FTC said the alleged collusion had a particularly harmful impact on small and midsized enterprises and small business owners, as they typically have lower credit ratings, making it more difficult for them to raise funds through unsecured loans or to provide additional collateral.

As a result, such borrowers rely heavily on secured loans, meaning banks' decisions on LTV ratios have a significant influence on whether financing is available, the FTC aid.

The case marks the first application of a revised fair trade law that took effect on Dec. 30, 2021, which introduced a new provision banning anti-competitive collusion through the exchange of sensitive business information.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Collusion hurts the common man the most. The article says SMEs and small business owners suffered. It's the same story everywhere—big players fix the game, and the small entrepreneur struggles for loans. Good on the FTC for taking action under the new law.
A
Aman W
Exchanging internal documents for years... 7,500 cases! This wasn't a mistake, it was a coordinated strategy. The fine is a good start, but what about criminal charges for the executives involved? Just a financial penalty often gets treated as a cost of doing business.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see this from an Indian perspective. Our RBI has strict LTV norms for home loans too to prevent bubbles. This case shows how easily banks can undermine those rules if left unchecked. Transparency is key.
V
Vikram M
While the action is commendable, I hope the focus isn't just on punishment. The system that allowed this to happen for so long needs fixing. Better monitoring and whistleblower protections are essential to prevent such collusion in the first place.
K
Kavya N
"Stable operating profits" for them meant less choice and higher costs for regular people trying to buy a home. It's a classic case of profit over people. Glad they got caught. Makes me appreciate the competitive home loan market we have here a bit more!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50