Iran Protests Challenge Regime But No Threat To Survival, Says Expert

A senior researcher states that while the widespread protests in Iran pose a significant challenge to the government, they do not currently threaten its survival due to the lack of a unified opposition. The demonstrations are driven by a severe economic situation marked by currency depreciation and high inflation. Regional stability could be jeopardized if the regime were to fragment, highlighting the importance of a stable Iran. Meanwhile, tensions with the US persist, with recent warnings from former President Trump and defensive pledges from Iran's president.

Key Points: Iran Protests: Expert Says Regime Faces Challenge, Not Threat

  • Protests stem from severe economic crisis
  • Regime faces challenge but not existential threat
  • Iran lacks unified opposition
  • Fragmentation risk if regime falls
  • US-Iran tensions remain elevated
3 min read

'Regime has no silver bullet solution for economic problem in Iran': Senior Researcher

Senior researcher Dennis Citrinowicz analyzes Iran's economic protests, regime stability, and regional implications amid US-Iran tensions.

"The regime has no silver bullet solution for the economic problem in Iran. - Dennis Citrinowicz"

Tel Aviv, January 4

In the wake of the protests which took place in Iran as the country is facing severe economic strain, Senior Researcher Dennis Citrinowicz toldthat despite the challenging situation in Iran, a regime change is unlikely and that one has to wait and watch how things develop.

The protests come as Iran faces severe economic strain, including a rapidly depreciating currency and high inflation, compounded by years of drought in Tehran, a city of around 10 million people.

Speaking to ANI on the widespread anti-government protests in Iran, Citrinowicz, Senior Researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), told ANI, "These riots and protests started because of financial reasons. The economic situation in Iran is extremely bad, especially in terms of the exchange rate between the local currency and the dollar... Even though these events are definitely challenging the regime in Iran, they are still not posing a threat to the survival of the regime... The Iranian regime has coped with much more severe demonstrations in the past".

Answering a question regarding any threat to the current Iranian government, he said, "It's safe to say it is challenging to the regime but not close to toppling the regime. Iran does not have a unified opposition, a unified leadership or even unified demands...We have to wait and see how things will develop. But these are challenging days for the regime that has no silver bullet solution for the economic problem in Iran."

He added that because of the above factors, there is no immediate threat to the regime.

On US President Trump's statement on the protest, Citrinowicz said, "I think that President Trump wants to show himself as someone who is not aligned with President Obama's policy... A lot depends on how the US is willing to use it to protect the protesters..."

When asked about the implications of regime change in Iran and its impact on the regional stability in West Asia, particularly in conflict zones where Iran has an influence, he told ANI, "If we see the regime getting toppled, it will be some sort of fragmentation of Iran, which is something very bad for the region. Iran is a very central location in Central Asia... A stable Iran is important to the region..."

Iranian leaders have adopted a comparatively conciliatory tone, with President Masoud Pezeshkian saying the government is at "fault" for the situation and pledging to seek solutions.

Tensions between Tehran and Washington remain elevated following US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites in June 2025, during a 12-day escalation involving Israel, an operation Trump later described as a "very successful attack".

Last week, during a joint appearance with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump warned that the US would "knock the hell out" of Iran if it advanced its nuclear or ballistic weapons programmes. The remarks came amid renewed Israeli efforts to resume attacks on Iran.

Pezeshkian has said Iran would respond with a "severe" reaction to any aggression.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting analysis. The mention of a fragmented Iran being bad for regional stability is crucial. West Asia is already volatile. As an observer from India, stability there is important for our energy security and diaspora welfare.
V
Vikram M
No silver bullet solution indeed. High inflation and currency crash - reminds me of some tough phases in our own economic history. The government admitting fault is a start, but people need results, not just words.
R
Rohit P
The external threats from US and Israel complicate everything. Trump's rhetoric is dangerous. As Indians, we've seen how foreign intervention rarely helps ordinary citizens. The focus should be on internal economic reform.
P
Priya S
While I understand the researcher's cautious analysis, I respectfully disagree on downplaying the protests. When basic needs aren't met, people's patience runs out. The regime may be stable now, but for how long? The drought situation in Tehran sounds severe.
N
Nikhil C
Geopolitical tensions affecting common people's lives. Hope cooler heads prevail. India has good relations with many in the region; perhaps we can play a constructive role? 🤔

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50