US Eyes Strategic Gains in South Asia via Iran, Afghanistan Moves

The US, under President Trump, has expressed interest in re-establishing a strategic military presence at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan. Concurrently, potential regime change in Iran could offer Washington direct sea access and a pathway to rare earth mineral reserves in Balochistan. Pakistan's military and political leadership has actively courted US investment for these critical minerals, earning praise from Trump. These developments are being closely monitored by India, given their potential impact on regional peace and stability.

Key Points: US Strategy in South & Central Asia: Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan

  • US aims for post-regime change foothold in Iran
  • Strategic interest in re-establishing Bagram Airfield
  • Access to Balochistan's rare earth minerals
  • Pakistan's military and political outreach to US
  • Regional stability concerns for India
3 min read

Recent developments in South and Central Asia may offer US a strategic foothold

Analysis of US strategic interests involving Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, focusing on Bagram base, rare earth minerals, and regional stability.

"I get along with Pakistan, as you know very well. Very, very well. - Donald Trump"

New Delhi, Feb 28

When the American media posed a direct question to the US President Donald Trump on his likely intervention in the Afghanistan-Pakistan conflict, he was perhaps more besieged that time with the upcoming strikes in Iran than thinking beyond.

However, he did say he may intervene, adding, "I get along with Pakistan, as you know very well. Very, very well," before departing on Marine One.

Once Washington achieves its target of changing the regime, and has boots on Iranian grounds -- literally, or with an ally as ruler in Tehran -- the US would be knocking at Afghanistan's western boundary.

Trump's "favourite Field Marshal", Pakistan's Asim Munir, can meanwhile take care of Afghanistan's southern and eastern front.

President Trump has been eager to re-establish a US base in Bagram -- a strategically placed military airfield about 60 km north of Kabul.

It used to be the operational centre of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), led by American troops, during its occupation of Afghanistan.

The Taliban had reacted by ruling it out, emphasising on Afghanistan's independence and sovereignty.

The location serves as an ideal base for operation and reconnaissance across a large part of Asia, including keeping an eye on China.

With pressure on the Taliban from all sides, the path to Bagram may lay clear.

With Iran, the US would have direct access to sea routes from the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea with ports at Bandar Abbas and Chabahar in Iran, and Gwadar, Pasni, and Karachi in Pakistan.

It also gives Washington an access to the reported reserves of rare earth in Balochistan without being worried of much insurgent offensives since the Baloch separatists would be cut off on all sides.

The region lies in the tri-junction of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran.

General Munir, during his White House visit last year with Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, reportedly showcased these critical minerals to the US President and is said to have also met American investors, seeking around $500 million investment agreement to develop the critical minerals sector in Balochistan.

They had also offered the US President to develop Pasni, a deep-sea fishing port in Balochistan's Gwadar district, as a full-fledged harbour.

Asim Munir considers the rare earth reserves as a potential economic asset for Pakistan, that can help Islamabad reduce its huge debt and fill the treasury coffers.

On his part, Trump is also said to be interested in the rare earth elements, vital in a variety of applications for the American industry.

Since that visit, Trump has been full of praise for Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir and Prime Minister Sharif.

"You have a great Prime Minister. You have a great General there. You have a great leader that... I think two of the people that I really respect a lot. And I think that Pakistan is doing terrifically well," the US President reiterated when asked of renewed clashes between Afghanistan and Pakistan that has raised fresh concerns over the region's stability.

While a US State Department spokesperson told IANS earlier that Washington was closely watching the situation, it was also made clear that the US position supports Islamabad's security response.

"The United States supports Pakistan's right to defend itself against attacks from the Taliban, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist group," the Spokesperson added, also criticising the regime's approach to counterterrorism commitments.

Even as new development unfolds in the vicinity, India would be closely watching the developments since any untoward resultant could seriously affect peace and stability in the region.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The article mentions India is watching closely, and we should. But I hope our foreign policy is more proactive. America's interests are transient. We need to build our own enduring economic and security ties in the region, not just react to US-Pakistan moves.
R
Rohit P
So the US wants Bagram back to "keep an eye on China"? And they'll use Pakistan for the southern front? This feels like the Great Game all over again, with our neighborhood as the chessboard. Ordinary Afghans and people in Balochistan will suffer the most. Very tragic.
S
Sarah B
From an outsider's perspective, the US support for Pakistan's "right to defend itself" against the Taliban is ironic, given the history. The focus on rare earth minerals explains the sudden friendship. It's all about resources, not regional stability.
V
Vikram M
The mention of developing Pasni port is key. Gwadar (with Chinese involvement) and now possibly Pasni with US? The Arabian Sea is getting crowded. India must accelerate the development of its own ports and the International North-South Transport Corridor with Iran and Russia.
K
Karthik V
While the analysis is detailed, I feel it presents a very US-centric view of the region. The agency of Afghanistan, Iran, and the people of Balochistan is missing. They are not just pieces to be moved by Washington or Rawalpindi. A more nuanced take would be welcome.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50