RBI Proposes 1-Hour Delay on Large Digital Payments to Combat Fraud

The Reserve Bank of India has released a discussion paper proposing four key safety measures for digital transactions to combat fraud, which exceeded ₹22,930 crore in value in 2025. The primary proposal is a mandatory one-hour delay on account-to-account transfers above ₹10,000, allowing customers time to cancel and breaking the psychological pressure fraudsters create. Other options include mandatory authentication by a trusted person for high-value transfers by seniors, holding large credits as "shadow" funds until legitimized, and a 'kill switch' to instantly disable all payment channels. The RBI is seeking stakeholder feedback until May 8 before potentially issuing draft guidelines.

Key Points: RBI Mulls 1-Hour Lag for Digital Payments Over ₹10,000

  • 1-hour hold for payments over ₹10,000
  • Extra auth for seniors & disabled on large transfers
  • Shadow credits for accounts receiving over ₹25L/year
  • Customer 'kill switch' to disable payments
3 min read

RBI moots one-hour lag in digital payments as safety step

RBI proposes a 1-hour delay on digital payments above ₹10,000, extra checks for seniors, and a 'kill switch' to fight rising online fraud, now over ₹22,930 crore.

"Introducing lag at the payer's end breaks the fraudster's psychological control. - RBI Discussion Paper"

Mumbai, April 9

The Reserve Bank of India on Thursday released a discussion paper that sets out four options for introducing extra layers of safeguards in digital transactions, which include a lagged credit for authorised push payments above Rs 10,000 in order to check mounting frauds which crossed the Rs 22,930 crore mark in 2025.

The other three options include additional authentication by a trusted person for high-value digital transactions by senior citizens, only accounts with satisfactory additional review to receive large credits, and customer-induced controls.

According to the first option, banks would be required to hold account-to-account transfers above Rs 10,000 for one hour at the payer's end before executing them. During this period, customers would retain the option to cancel the transaction.

If a transaction appears suspicious, the bank would be required to seek reconfirmation from the payer before proceeding. Merchant payments, e-mandates, NACH transactions, and cheques would be exempt. Customers could also whitelist specific payees to bypass the delay.

The RBI noted that transactions above Rs 10,000 account for approximately 98.5 per cent of total fraud value while making up around 45 per cent of reported fraud cases by volume, which justifies the threshold as a targeted safeguard.

The RBI paper points out that most digital frauds today do not involve a technical breach of systems. Instead, fraudsters use social engineering, impersonation, and coercion to pressure victims into transferring money themselves, a category known as Authorised Push Payment or APP fraud. Once funds move through near-instant channels like UPI or IMPS, recovery becomes extremely difficult.

"Fraudsters typically rely on creating urgency and maintaining continuous psychological pressure on the victim to prevent deliberation. Introducing lag at the payer's end breaks the fraudster's psychological control," the paper observes.

The other proposals would require citizens aged 70 and above and persons with disabilities to nominate a "trusted person" whose authentication would be mandatory for transfers above Rs 50,000. Such cases cover nearly 92 per cent of the fraud value reported to NCRP.

The second proposal would cap annual aggregate credits into individual and small business accounts at Rs 25 lakh. Amounts beyond this threshold would be held as "shadow credit" accessible only after the account holder satisfies the bank about the transaction's legitimacy. If no justification is provided within 30 days, the funds will be returned to the sender.

The fourth proposal involves a "kill switch" that would allow customers to instantly disable all digital payment channels from their account in one step, a feature already operational in Singapore and being rolled out by some banks in Australia.

The RBI said these options are aimed at the broad objectives of inducing a lag in select categories of digital payments (by way of process-level changes or in terms of additional due diligence thereby buying time for both customers and PSOs to limit fraudulent transactions from being executed or proceeds thereof from being moved quickly, and empowering the customer through the provision of customised controls.

The apex bank also acknowledged the tradeoffs involved, noting that a mandatory lag conflicts with the core design principle of instant payments and could confuse users. It also flagged that fraudsters may simply pressure victims into whitelisting transactions, reducing the mechanism's effectiveness.

Stakeholders have until May 8 to submit comments through the RBI's Connect 2 Regulate portal. The central bank said it will consider issuing draft guidelines after reviewing feedback.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
While safety is important, a one-hour lag for payments above 10k is too disruptive. UPI's success is built on instant transfers. What if I'm paying a medical bill or a vendor urgently? The whitelist is a workaround, but it adds friction for genuine users.
A
Arjun K
The statistics speak for themselves - 98.5% of fraud value from transactions over ₹10,000! The psychological angle is smart. Scammers create panic so you act fast. A forced cooling-off period breaks that spell. Good step, but implementation must be user-friendly.
S
Sarah B
As someone who works with small businesses, the ₹25 lakh annual credit cap proposal worries me. What about seasonal businesses with high turnover? Having funds held as "shadow credit" for 30 days could cripple cash flow. Safety shouldn't strangle commerce.
V
Vikram M
The 'kill switch' is a brilliant idea! Should be mandatory for all banks. Sometimes you just need to freeze everything if you lose your phone or suspect fraud. More power to the customer is always better. Hope they implement this quickly.
N
Nisha Z
RBI is right to acknowledge the trade-offs. We can't have it both ways - maximum safety and maximum speed. For high-value transactions, I'd gladly trade an hour for peace of mind. Scams are getting too sophisticated. Jai Hind to a safer digital India! 🇮🇳

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50