RBI Compounds Metrocorp's FEMA Case, Ends Adjudication After ED Nod

The Reserve Bank of India has passed a compounding order in the FEMA case against Metrocorp Infrastructure Limited, terminating adjudication proceedings. The order followed a "No Objection" from the Enforcement Directorate, which had investigated the company for late reporting of foreign inward payments totaling Rs 110.62 crore. Metrocorp applied for compounding, leading to a one-time settlement payment of Rs 1,03,320. This action concludes the legal proceedings against the company under the Foreign Exchange Management Act.

Key Points: RBI Compounds Metrocorp FEMA Case, Ends Legal Action

  • RBI issues compounding order
  • Based on ED's no objection
  • For late reporting of Rs 110.62 crore
  • One-time payment of Rs 1,03,320
2 min read

RBI allows compounding of Metrocom Infrastructure's FEMA case

RBI allows compounding for Metrocorp Infrastructure's FEMA violations after ED's no objection, terminating adjudication for Rs 110.62 crore reporting delay.

"This has resulted in termination of adjudication proceedings - RBI statement"

New Delhi, March 12

The Reserve Bank of India issued a compounding order, on February 10, under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, in the case of Metrocorp Infrastructure Limited, which has resulted in termination of adjudication proceedings against the company for contraventions of provisions of the law, according to an official statement issued on Thursday.

The order has been passed by the RBI after issuance of "No Objection" by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED).

The ED investigation was conducted after credible information was received in the case. After completion of the investigation, the ED filed a complaint under FEMA before the Adjudicating Authority for the late reporting of foreign inward payments to the tune of Rs 110.62 crore.

As per the provisions of FEMA, the adjudication proceedings were initiated by the Adjudicating Authority by issuance of a Show Cause Notice dated January 10, under FEMA, to the company and its directors who were in charge and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company during the relevant period of contravention.

The company, later on, filed an application before the RBl for compounding of the said contraventions under FEMA as per the provisions of Section 15 of the Act. On reference from the RBl, the ED issued no objection for such compounding in line with the true spirit of the Act, the statement said.

Accordingly, the RBl, on the basis of no objection issued by the ED, has compounded the said contraventions vide compounding order with a one-time payment of Rs 1, 03,320.

This has resulted in termination of adjudication proceedings with respect to aforementioned contraventions under the provisions of FEMA against the company, as well as further litigation, the statement added.

The RBI has the power under Section 15 of FEMA, 1999, to compound most foreign exchange contraventions, excluding Section 3(a) (e.g., hawala transactions). It assesses violations, calculates penalties up to 300 per cent of the amount (or Rs 200,000 for specific cases under the new 2025 guidelines), and issues orders within 180 days.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Good to see the RBI and ED working in coordination. The process was followed - investigation, show cause notice, application for compounding, and a final order. This saves judicial time and resources for more serious cases. A pragmatic approach.
R
Rohit P
The key detail is the ED gave a "No Objection". This wasn't a case of evasion or hawala, just late reporting. Compounding makes sense for procedural lapses. It's a relief for businesses who make genuine mistakes in complex forex regulations.
S
Sarah B
As someone who deals with corporate compliance, this is a positive signal. The system allows for rectification. A long-drawn adjudication for a reporting delay helps no one. The one-time payment closes the chapter and lets the company focus on business.
K
Karthik V
While I understand the efficiency argument, there must be absolute transparency. Was the delay 30 days or 3 years? The public only sees the final amount. The RBI should disclose more details in such orders to maintain trust. 🇮🇳
N
Nisha Z
This is how it should work for technical violations. The money came in, it was just reported late. No need to clog courts. Hope this sets a precedent for other similar cases and reduces litigation burden. Good move by the authorities.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50