Mon, 9 Nov 2026 · LIVE
Updated Oct 30, 2026 · 09:00
Punjab News Updated Oct 30, 2026

Punjab logs 1,007 stubble-burning cases, Tarn Taran tops with 397

Punjab has recorded 1,007 stubble-burning incidents this paddy harvesting season, according to the district-wise report of the Punjab Pollution Control Board. Tarn Taran tops the list with 397 cases, followed by Amritsar with 171 and Ferozepur with 104, while Mansa recorded none. The report also notes 778 inspections, 246 FIRs, Rs 17.50 lakh in environmental compensation and red entries in the revenue records of 297 fields.

Ten Out of Ten – a novel by Anosh Abraham. Pre-order now

Punjab records 1,007 stubble-burning cases; Tarn Taran tops list with 397 incidents

Patiala, Oct 30

Punjab has recorded 1,007 stubble-burning incidents during the ongoing paddy harvesting season, with Tarn Taran district accounting for the highest number of cases, followed by Amritsar and Ferozepur, according to the district-wise report of the Punjab Pollution Control Board.

Tarn Taran reported 397 cases, accounting for nearly 39 per cent of the total incidents recorded across the state. Amritsar stood second with 171 cases, while Ferozepur ranked third with 104 incidents.

The three districts together accounted for 672 cases, indicating a concentration of stubble-burning incidents in these areas.

According to the PPCB report, Gurdaspur recorded 72 cases, followed by Kapurthala with 63, Bathinda with 31, Fazilka with 28, Jalandhar with 22 and Faridkot with 21 incidents.

Patiala and Hoshiarpur recorded 16 and 12 cases, respectively. Sangrur also reported 12 incidents, while Fatehgarh Sahib recorded 11. Muktsar reported nine cases, followed by Moga, Barnala and SAS Nagar with seven each.

Ludhiana recorded six incidents, Malerkotla five, SBS Nagar three, Rupnagar two and Pathankot one. No stubble-burning incident was recorded in Mansa in the report.

The report further stated that of the 1,007 incidents reported across Punjab, officials had inspected 778 locations. Stubble burning was confirmed at 379 locations following the inspections.

Additionally, 26 fields were found to have traces of stubble burning by PPF and nodal officers.

As part of enforcement measures, environmental compensation was imposed in 349 cases. The total penalty imposed stood at Rs 17.50 lakh, of which Rs 13.15 lakh had been recovered, the report stated.

A total of 246 FIRs have also been registered in connection with stubble-burning incidents, while red entries have been made in the revenue records of 297 fields.

The authorities have issued 426 warnings and show-cause notices to nodal and supervisory officers in connection with the incidents.

However, the report recorded zero figures for prosecution action under Section 14 of the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) Act, filing of chargesheets and suspension of officials.

In Patiala district, 16 stubble-burning cases have been reported so far. Officials inspected 14 locations and confirmed burning at seven of them.

Environmental compensation was imposed in six cases in the district, amounting to Rs 35,000, of which Rs 20,000 has been recovered.

The report provides cumulative figures for the ongoing season up to October 29 and does not contain a separate district-wise breakdown of fresh incidents reported during the preceding 24 hours. Therefore, the district recording the highest number of new cases during that period cannot be established from these figures.

With the paddy harvesting season underway, the state authorities are continuing inspections and enforcement measures to curb stubble burning, which contributes to air pollution during the post-monsoon period.

— IANS

Reader’s Guide · AI-assisted, based only on the report above

What the report makes clear: District-wise stubble-burning counts, inspections, penalties and FIRs for the season up to October 29 are set out in official figures.

Still open: The report does not yet say how many of the confirmed burning sites led to prosecution or how this season compares with previous years.

Another way to look at it: Enforcement data shows action taken, but farmers' alternatives for residue disposal and the cost of compliance are not covered here.

What would help farmers and authorities reduce stubble burning more effectively?

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked