Pak-Afghan Border War Escalates as Peace Prospects Dim: Report

The conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan has sharply deteriorated, with recent major border assaults and retaliatory airstrikes. Pakistan's Defence Minister has declared the situation an "open war," citing Taliban support for the TTP. Despite a past ceasefire mediated by Turkey and Qatar, subsequent negotiations have failed. The report concludes that third-country mediation is currently unfocused, making a lasting solution to the clashes remote.

Key Points: Pak-Afghan Conflict Escalates, Lasting Solution Unlikely

  • Major Feb border attacks by Afghan troops
  • Pakistan's retaliatory airstrikes on 22 targets
  • 2025 ceasefire failed to bring lasting peace
  • Pakistan wields economic & refugee pressure tools
  • Third-party mediation efforts lack focus
3 min read

Prospects for lasting solution to Pak-Afghan conflict remain unlikely: Report

Report details major military clashes between Pakistan and Afghanistan, highlighting airstrikes, border attacks, and dim prospects for a mediated peace.

"the hostilities between the two countries had escalated into an 'open war' - Khwaja Asif"

Canberra, March 7

The ongoing conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan marks a sharp deterioration in bilateral ties that have simmered since the Taliban reclaimed power in August 2021. Islamabad has previously carried out significant airstrikes targetting Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan militants in Afghanistan, notably in December 2024, a report has highlighted.

"On 26 February, Afghan troops launched major attacks on a dozen Pakistani border posts, which, according to the Afghan government, were in retaliation for Pakistan airstrikes on Pakistan Taliban, known as the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), hideouts in Afghanistan earlier in February. Islamabad responded by bombing 22 cities and military targets in Kabul, Kandahar, Paktia, Nangarhar, Khost and Paktika provinces," a report in Australia-based think tank Asialink mentioned.

Citing official Pakistani military spokesperson, Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, the report noted that 274 Taliban personnel have been killed and over 400 injured, while 73 Afghan posts along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border have been destroyed and 18 seized. Pakistan's Defence Minister Khwaja Asif said that the hostilities between the two countries had escalated into an "open war".

According to the report, the last major military clash between the two countries occurred in October 2025 and concluded with a ceasefire mediated by Turkey and Qatar. However, despite subsequent negotiations, the two countries failed to reach a lasting peace agreement.

In the latest assaults, it said, Pakistan's air force targetted Taliban military facilities in Kabul, reflecting Islamabad's hardline stance over the Taliban's refusal to expel the TTP from its territory.

"In addition to its military might, Pakistan has other tools in its State kit. It could further tighten movement across its 2600-kilometre border. The critical border controls at Torkham and Chaman provide about 40 per cent of Afghanistan's customs revenue. By imposing further tariffs on top of the existing 10 per cent and greater import restrictions, it would make it more costly economically for the Taliban to continue to support the TTP," the report detailed.

"Pakistan could increase the number of Afghan refugees it forcefully repatriates to Afghanistan, creating more economic hardship for the country. In 2025 alone, 930,000 Afghans were repatriated, 67 per cent of them forcefully," it added.

The report stressed that there appears to be no determined effort by third countries to initiate peace talks between the two countries.

"Saudi Arabia and Qatar did offer to help mediate a ceasefire, but as these two countries were the targets of Iranian retaliation in its war with Israel and the US, their focus is now on their home front. However, as with the previous attempt at mediation in 2025, the likelihood of finding a lasting solution to this latest clash between these two countries is remote, at best," it noted.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The human cost is heartbreaking đź’”. 930,000 refugees repatriated, many forcefully? That's a humanitarian crisis. While Pakistan's security concerns are valid, creating more economic hardship for ordinary Afghans won't solve the TTP problem. The international community needs to step up mediation efforts, but everyone seems preoccupied with other conflicts.
V
Vikram M
Frankly, this was predictable. Pakistan nurtured the Taliban for strategic depth against India. Now they have a Taliban government next door that doesn't listen to them. Karma, as they say. The report mentions using border controls and tariffs as tools—this will hurt Afghanistan badly. A tough situation with no easy answers.
S
Sarah B
Reading this from a security studies perspective. The report correctly identifies the lack of a determined third-party mediator. With Saudi and Qatar distracted, and the US largely withdrawn, there's a vacuum. This prolonged instability on our western periphery isn't good for anyone in South Asia. India should perhaps engage in quiet diplomacy, but it's a very complex space.
R
Rohit P
"Open war" as per their Defence Minister is a serious escalation. The 2600 km border is porous and a major concern for us too. While the conflict is between them, spillover effects in terms of refugee flows or militant movement are real risks for India. Our security forces on the LOC and western border must be on high alert. Jai Hind.
K
Kavya N
I have a slightly different take. The report is comprehensive, but it misses the historical context of the Durand Line dispute. Afghanistan never accepted this border. Until that fundamental

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50