Prince Harry, UK PM Starmer Slam Trump's "Appalling" NATO Troop Remarks

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Prince Harry have strongly condemned remarks by former US President Donald Trump that appeared to downplay the role and sacrifices of NATO allies in Afghanistan. Starmer, in a video message, called Trump's comments "insulting and frankly appalling" while honoring British personnel who died. Prince Harry, a veteran of two Afghan tours, issued a statement emphasizing that allies answered the call after 9/11 and that the sacrifices deserve truth and respect. The White House, however, defended Trump's position, stating the US has done more for NATO than any other ally.

Key Points: Harry, Starmer Condemn Trump Over NATO Afghanistan Comments

  • Trump questioned NATO allies' frontline support
  • Starmer paid tribute to 457 UK lives lost
  • Harry invoked his service and lost friends
  • White House defended Trump's stance
3 min read

Prince Harry, UK PM Starmer condemn Trump's remarks on NATO troops to Afghanistan

Prince Harry and UK PM Keir Starmer condemn Donald Trump's remarks on NATO troops in Afghanistan as "insulting," defending allied sacrifices.

"I consider President Trump's remarks to be insulting and frankly appalling - Keir Starmer"

Washington DC, January 24

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Prince Harry condemned the remarks by US President Donald Trump about sending troops to the Afghan frontlines, CNN reported.

Their reactions came after Trump, in an interview with Fox News, spoke about the US involvement in NATO and said that Washington received little in return when compared to its contributions. "Will they be there if we ever needed them?" Trump asked, "I'm not sure of that."

With regards to NATO members sending troops to Afghanistan, CNN reported that Trump said, "We've never needed them. We have never really asked anything of them. You know, they'll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that. And they did - they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines," he said.

In a video message on X, the UK PM paid tributes to the 457 armed forces personnel who lost their lives in Afghanistan and recalled their courage, bravery and sacrifice and several of those injured with life-changing injuries.

"I consider President Trump's remarks to be insulting and frankly appalling", he said.

A key principle of the NATO alliance is Article 5, under which all members agree to come to the defence of any member state if it is attacked. Article 5 has been invoked once, by the United States after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks.

CNN reported that around 3,500 allied troops died in the conflict, of whom 2456 were Americans and 457 were British.

The Duke of Sussex, who served in the British Army with two tours of Afghanistan, issued a strong statement via his spokesperson on January 23 in response to Trump, People reported.

As per People, Harry said, "In 2001, NATO invoked Article 5 for the first--and only--time in history. It meant that every allied nation was obliged to stand with the United States in Afghanistan, in pursuit of our shared security. Allies answered that call. I served there. I made lifelong friends there. And I lost friends there".

He further said, "Thousands of lives were changed forever. Mothers and fathers buried sons and daughters. Children were left without a parent. Families are left carrying the cost...Those sacrifices deserve to be spoken about truthfully and with respect, as we all remain united and loyal to the defence of diplomacy and peace."

CNN reported that when asked to respond to Starmer's comments, the White House shrugged off his criticism and insisted Trump was correct.

"President Trump is absolutely right - the United States of America has done more for NATO than any other country in the alliance has done combined," Taylor Rogers, a White House spokeswoman, said as per CNN.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While I understand the political arguments about NATO contributions, the language used about troops "staying a little back" is deeply disrespectful to every soldier who served, regardless of nationality. The families of the 457 British personnel deserve better.
P
Priya S
It's sad to see such statements. India has always valued strong diplomatic ties and mutual respect between nations. Undermining allies publicly helps no one. Jai Hind.
R
Rohit P
The White House response is typical "my way or the highway". But Prince Harry speaking from personal experience carries more weight. We Indians know the value of speaking truth to power. Respect to him for that.
M
Michael C
Having a respectful debate about NATO funding is one thing. Dismissing the sacrifice of thousands of allied troops is another. Starmer and Harry are correct to call this out. The numbers speak for themselves—3,500 allied deaths is not "staying back."
K
Kavya N
Watching from India, this feels like a family quarrel among Western powers. But the principle is important: you don't insult those who stood with you. Our culture teaches us *satya* (truth) and *samman* (respect). Those seem to be missing here.
D
David E

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50