NewKerala.com

Lebanon Seeks "Pause in Military Activity" in Crucial US-Mediated Israel Talks

Lebanon's Culture Minister frames upcoming US-mediated talks with Israel as a preliminary meeting aimed at achieving a pause, if not a ceasefire, in military activity. He states meaningful peace negotiations can only begin after hostilities subside and a degree of serenity is restored. The US State Department confirms the talks will involve top diplomats, focusing on long-term border security and supporting Lebanon's sovereignty. A US official emphasizes the conflict is with Hezbollah, not the Lebanese state, justifying continued diplomatic engagement between the neighbors.

Key Points: Lebanon-Israel Talks Aim for Pause in Hostilities, Not Full Ceasefire

  • Talks are preliminary, not full peace negotiations
  • Aim is a pause or de-escalation of military activity
  • Focus on Israel's border security & Lebanon's sovereignty
  • US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to participate
  • Conflict framed as Israel vs. Hezbollah, not Lebanon
2 min read

Preliminary meet to pause military activity, if not ceasefire: Lebanon minister ahead of talks with Israel

Lebanon's minister calls US-mediated talks a "preliminary meeting" to stop Israeli attacks. Discussions focus on border security and Lebanese sovereignty.

"preparatory meeting on ambassador level in order to produce a pause in military activity if not a ceasefire. - Ghassan Salame"

Beirut, April 14

Lebanon's Culture Minister Ghassan Salame has said that the upcoming talks between Israeli and Lebanese ambassadors in Washington, DC, are intended as a "preliminary meeting" aimed at stopping Israeli attacks on Lebanese territory, according to Al Jazeera.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Salame on Tuesday highlighted that the upcoming engagement is a "preparatory meeting on ambassador level in order to produce a pause in military activity if not a ceasefire."

He said meaningful negotiations would only be possible once hostilities subsided. He added that discussions on peace could only happen "with some kind of serenity" after a halt in bombardment by Israel.

Salame noted that Lebanon had received "some kind of commitment that there should be a de-escalation" in the Beirut area, though he cautioned that "guarantees is probably too big a word".

He acknowledged Lebanon's limited leverage in the talks, but said the government's objective was to "reassert the state authority".

On the issue of disarming Hezbollah, Salame said the process "takes time" and cannot be achieved quickly, adding that it would not be resolved "in a matter of hours or days."

Meanwhile, a US State Department official said that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio will participate in talks between Israel and Lebanon on Tuesday (local time) in Washington, DC.

The negotiations, set to take place at the United States Department of State, will also include US Ambassador to Lebanon Michel Issa and State Department counsellor Michael Needham as part of the American delegation, according to CNN.

The Israeli and Lebanese sides will be represented by their respective ambassadors, Yechiel Leiter and Nada Hamadeh, respectively.

CNN said a US State Department official said the talks would focus on advancing dialogue aimed at ensuring long-term security along Israel's northern border, while also supporting Lebanon's efforts to reassert full sovereignty over its territory and political system.

"This conversation will scope the ongoing dialogue about how to ensure the long-term security of Israel's northern border and to support the Government of Lebanon's determination to reclaim full sovereignty over its territory and political life," the official said.

The official added that despite ongoing hostilities, the conflict is between Israel and Hezbollah, not Lebanon as a state, underscoring the rationale for continued diplomatic engagement between the two neighbouring countries.

He added, "Israel is at war with Hezbollah, not Lebanon, so there is no reason the two neighbours should not be talking."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The minister says disarming Hezbollah "takes time". That's the core issue, isn't it? As long as a non-state actor with significant arms operates freely, Lebanon's sovereignty will remain compromised. Talks are good, but the root cause must be addressed.
A
Aman W
From an Indian perspective, we understand the complexities of border tensions. Dialogue is always better than violence. The US mediation is crucial, but the will for peace must come from within the region itself. Jai Hind.
S
Sarah B
Respectfully, the article highlights Lebanon's "limited leverage." It's a difficult position for any government to be in. I hope the talks focus on humanitarian pauses first to allow aid and recovery, before jumping to grand political solutions.
V
Vikram M
The US official saying "Israel is at war with Hezbollah, not Lebanon" is a key distinction. It allows a diplomatic path. Similar logic is needed in many global conflicts. Hope the ambassadors can build some trust.
K
Karthik V
A 'preliminary meeting' is better than no meeting at all. But words like "some kind of commitment" and "guarantees is probably too big a word" don't inspire much confidence. The people suffering need real action, not just diplomatic chatter.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50