Sri Lanka's JVP Condemns US "Military Aggression" in Venezuela

Sri Lanka's ruling Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) has issued a strong statement condemning reported US military action against Venezuela. The party asserts that Venezuela, as a sovereign nation, has the exclusive right to determine its political future without external interference. It emphasizes that democratic governance must be guided by universally accepted principles of sovereignty and human rights. The condemnation follows reports of the abduction of deposed leader Nicolás Maduro and the subsequent appointment of an acting president in Venezuela.

Key Points: Sri Lanka's JVP Condemns US Action Against Venezuela

  • JVP condemns US action as military aggression
  • Asserts Venezuela's sovereign right to self-determination
  • Calls for adherence to democratic norms
  • Reaffirms support for Venezuela's independence
3 min read

"Powerful countries do not have the right to violate this principle": Sri Lanka's ruling JVP on US action against Venezuela

Sri Lanka's ruling JVP party condemns US military action in Venezuela, asserting sovereignty principles and denouncing the reported abduction of Nicolás Maduro.

"Powerful countries do not have the right to violate this principle": Sri Lanka's ruling JVP on US action against Venezuela
"Powerful countries do not have the right to violate this principle. - JVP statement"

Colombo, January 4

Sri Lanka's ruling Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna on Sunday strongly condemned what it described as military aggression by the United States against Venezuela, denouncing the alleged abduction of deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro and his wife.

According to the Daily Mirror, the JVP said in an official statement that Venezuela, as an independent and sovereign nation, has the right to determine its political future without external interference.

The party emphasised that the choice of leadership must rest solely with the Venezuelan people, as it would in any free country.

"Powerful countries do not have the right to violate this principle," the statement said.

The JVP further stressed that democratic governance and international relations must be guided by universally accepted norms.

"Modern society and governance should be civilised. Democracy, human rights and sovereignty of states are universally accepted principles. Military aggressions and invasions against sovereign states in violation of these principles cannot be justified," the statement added.

Reiterating its opposition to the reported US action, the party said, "In that line, we believe that nobody will approve of the forceful military aggression against Venezuela by the United States of America."

The JVP reaffirmed its support for Venezuela's sovereignty.

"Accordingly, we condemn the military invasion of Venezuela by the United States of America and stand for Venezuela's sovereignty and independence," the statement said, as reported by the Daily Mirror.

These remarks come amid rapidly unfolding developments involving deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro.

Deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro was seen wishing reporters and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents a Happy New Year and Good Night during his perp walk.

US authorities later released video footage showing him in handcuffs as he was led into custody.

Following his removal, Venezuela's Supreme Court ordered Vice President Delcy Rodriguez to assume the powers and duties of acting president, CNN reported.

The order, announced late Saturday night local time, concluded that deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro was in a "material and temporary impossibility to exercise his functions."

According to the ruling read by Justice Tania D'Amelio during a session broadcast on state television channel VTV, Rodriguez will "assume and exercise, as acting president, all the powers, duties, and faculties inherent to the office of president of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, in order to guarantee administrative continuity and the comprehensive defence of the nation," CNN reported.

Venezuela's constitution states that when there is a temporary or absolute absence of the president, the vice president must replace them.

Providing background, former US National Security Advisor John Bolton told CNN that a plan to remove deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro had been presented to US President Donald Trump during his first term but failed to move forward because officials were unable to keep the president "focused" on the issue.

Bolton said Trump was "very interested in the Venezuelan oil" at the time, but despite efforts by his team, they "couldn't keep him focused on it."

He also said the Venezuelan opposition then believed that sustained economic pressure would be sufficient to split deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro's regime.

According to CNN, the United States later launched what Trump described as a "large-scale strike against Venezuela" and captured deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro to face charges, carrying out the regime change effort without congressional approval.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The statement about Trump being interested in "Venezuelan oil" says it all, doesn't it? It's never about democracy or human rights for these interventions. It's about resources. A sad reality of geopolitics.
R
Rohit P
While I agree with the principle of sovereignty, we must also acknowledge that leaders like Maduro have caused immense suffering to their own people. The international community has a responsibility too. It's a complex issue.
A
Ananya R
Strong words from Colombo! The Global South is finally finding its voice against unilateral actions. We need more countries to stand up for the rules-based international order, not might-is-right.
D
David E
Interesting to see this perspective. The US often acts without UN mandate. As the article says, "without congressional approval." This bypassing of established domestic and international channels is problematic.
S
Siddharth J
The principle is correct, but the practice is messy. What if a sovereign government is oppressing its citizens? Where do you draw the line? Non-interference can't be an absolute shield for tyranny. Just my two paise.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50