NewKerala.com

IAEA Confirms Partial Damage at Iran's Natanz Nuclear Site, No Radiation Leak

The International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed partial damage to entrance buildings at Iran's underground Natanz nuclear facility based on satellite imagery. The agency stated there is no expected radiological consequence and no additional impact was detected at the plant's core, which was severely damaged in a conflict last June. This confirmation comes despite earlier IAEA reports downplaying strikes on nuclear sites, while Iran maintained at least one site was hit. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi called for maximum restraint and noted difficulties in obtaining real-time clarity from Iranian authorities.

Key Points: IAEA: Natanz Nuclear Site Damaged, No Radiation Leak

  • Partial damage to Natanz entrance buildings
  • No radiation leak detected
  • Site was a primary target in June conflict
  • IAEA urges maximum restraint
  • Difficulty in contacting Iranian authorities
2 min read

Partial damage to entrance buildings of Iran's Natanz nuclear site, but no radiation leak: IAEA

IAEA confirms partial damage to entrance buildings at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility from recent strikes, but reports no radiological impact.

"No radiological consequence expected and no additional impact detected at FEP itself - IAEA"

Tehran, March 3

The International Atomic Energy Agency on Tuesday confirmed that entrance buildings at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility have sustained partial damage, following analysis of satellite images taken over the past two days that appear to show the impact of the ongoing US-Israeli bombing campaign.

"Based on the latest available satellite imagery, IAEA can now confirm some recent damage to entrance buildings of Iran's underground Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant (FEP)," the agency said in a post on X.

"No radiological consequence expected and no additional impact detected at FEP itself, which was severely damaged in the June conflict," it added.

The Natanz facility was among the primary targets during the previous 12-day war between Israel and Iran in June, a conflict that later saw direct involvement by the United States.

A day earlier, on Monday, the IAEA had downplayed reports suggesting that nuclear sites in Iran had been struck in the latest round of hostilities.

Tehran, however, maintained that at least one site had suffered damage. While the head of the IAEA said there was no indication that nuclear installations in Iran had been hit in the recent airstrikes, Iran's ambassador to the agency asserted that the country's key nuclear site at Natanz had been attacked.

Addressing an extraordinary session of the agency's Board of Governors on Iran, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi called on "all parties to exercise maximum restraint to avoid further escalation."

"Regarding the status of the nuclear installations in Iran, up to now, we have no indication that any of the nuclear installations, including the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, the Tehran Research Reactor, or other nuclear fuel cycle facilities have been damaged or hit," he had said.

Grossi further stated that the agency was attempting to reach Iran's nuclear regulatory authorities but had not received any response.

"We are trying to contact them, with no response so far," he said, underscoring the difficulty in obtaining real-time clarity amid the intensifying conflict.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
The conflicting reports from IAEA and Iran are confusing. First they say no damage, then they confirm partial damage. It shows how difficult it is to get clear information in a war zone. Hope the situation de-escalates soon. 🙏
A
Aman W
As an Indian, I'm worried about the stability of the Middle East. Any major conflict there impacts global oil prices and our economy directly. Our government should continue its diplomatic efforts for peace. This tit-for-tat bombing needs to stop.
S
Sarah B
The most alarming part is that the IAEA can't even reach Iranian authorities. No communication during a potential nuclear incident? That's a recipe for disaster. Maximum restraint is needed, as Grossi said.
V
Vikram M
While the attack itself is wrong, we must also question why Iran's nuclear program is such a flashpoint. The world needs clean energy, but nuclear ambitions wrapped in geopolitical tensions are dangerous for everyone. Jai Hind.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, the IAEA's initial downplaying of the damage doesn't inspire confidence. They should be more cautious with their statements. Getting it wrong on something this sensitive hurts their credibility as a neutral watchdog.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50