Wed, 29 Jul 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jun 2, 2026 · 17:50
India News Updated Jun 2, 2026

Parliamentary Panel to Address Student Concerns Over CBSE’s OSM System

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, chaired by Digvijaya Singh, will consider student concerns over CBSE's On-Screen Marking (OSM) system. Class 12 student Sarthak Sidhant presented alleged discrepancies in the OSM tendering process, claiming changes favored a specific service provider. Singh confirmed the committee would deliberate on the issues raised and CBSE's responses. The panel is also reviewing the three-language formula for Classes 9 and 10.

Parliamentary panel to consider students' concerns on CBSE's OSM system: Digvijaya Singh

New Delhi, June 2

Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth and Sports Chairman Digvijaya Singh on Tuesday said the panel would consider concerns raised by students regarding the Central Board of Secondary Education's On-Screen Marking system after hearing a presentation by class 12 student Sarthak Sidhant.

The committee is currently examining the implementation of the OSM system in CBSE Class 12 examinations, along with the concerns related to evaluation practices and transparency in the assessment.

Speaking to reporters after the committee meeting, Singh confirmed that Sidhant made a presentation before the panel and that the committee would deliberate on the issues raised, as well as the responses submitted by the CBSE.

"Sarthak Siddhant has made his presentation. It is for the committee to decide (on the replies given by the CBSE)," Singh said.

Emphasising the committee's focus on students welfare, Singh said members would carefully examine all suggestions and concerns placed before them

"I am only saying that the whole committee is concerned and will also take into whatever can be done in the interest of the students and their stance. The committee's presentation has always been looking at the issues concerning the students and their problems. This is exactly what this committee has done," he told reporters.

When asked about the timeline for the committee's report, Singh said the process would involve the preparation of a draft report and placing it before members for deliberation.

"The process is that we have to prepare a draft, the basis of that draft will be put up before the committee and then the committee has to prepare the report," he said.

Earlier in the day, Sidhant appeared before the committee at Parliament House Annexe and highlighted alleged discrepancies in CBSE's OSM tendering process. The student claimed that changes in tender clauses relating to performance standards, blacklisting provisions and qualification criteria appeared to favour a particular service provider.

Sidhant also advocated greater transparency in educational procurement systems and suggested that the OSM system should undergo wider pilot testing before large-scale implementation.

Apart from examining concerns surrounding OSM, the parliamentary panel is also reviewing the implementation of the three-language formula in Classes 9 and 10. Senior officials from the Department of School Education and CBSE are expected to contribute to the committee's deliberations as it evaluates ongoing reforms in the education sector.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Priya S

As a parent of a Class 12 student, I'm relieved they're taking this seriously. But why does every education reform have to be so opaque? OSM should have been pilot-tested in 50 schools before rolling out. Students are not lab rats for bureaucratic experiments.

Ravi K

Good move by Digvijaya Singh ji. But this three-language formula discussion seems like a distraction. Why can't we focus on making one language (English) really strong for our kids rather than forcing three? Anyway, hope the committee does proper scrutiny.

Arjun K

This is what democracy looks like - a student can walk into Parliament and question the system! But I worry this will drag on for months like most committees. CBSE needs to implement OSM fairly, not just check a box for digital evaluation. Students deserve better.

Michael C

Appreciate the committee's willingness to listen. As someone who works in ed-tech, OSM has potential but rushing it without proper checks is risky. The tender clause changes raising concerns is a red flag. Hope the committee demands a CBI inquiry if needed.

Divya L

While I'm happy students are being heard, I'm skeptical about how much will change. Committees take months, students have already faced issues this year. Why can't CBSE just fix things immediately? Every year our kids suffer due to administrative delays.

N We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked