DMK MP Seeks Debate on India-US Trade Deal Impact on Farmers

DMK MP TR Baalu has moved an adjournment motion in the Lok Sabha, demanding a discussion on the framework of the India-US bilateral trade agreement. He warned that proposed zero tariffs on certain US agricultural products could be disastrous for Indian farmers. Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal countered that sensitive sectors are protected, using apples as an example where imports are managed via a quota less than current levels. The discussion occurs as Parliament prepares to debate the Union Budget for 2026-27.

Key Points: India-US Trade Deal: DMK MP Seeks Parliament Debate on Farm Impact

  • DMK MP seeks debate on US trade deal
  • Concerns over zero tariffs on farm imports
  • Govt says apple imports are a limited quota
  • Minister assures protection for domestic farmers
3 min read

Parliament Budget Session: DMK MP TR Baalu seeks discussion on India-US trade deal framework in Lok Sabha

DMK MP TR Baalu moves motion to discuss US trade deal framework, citing risks to Indian farmers. Govt assures protection for apple growers.

Parliament Budget Session: DMK MP TR Baalu seeks discussion on India-US trade deal framework in Lok Sabha
"This will be disastrous for our farmers and farm sector - TR Baalu"

New Delhi, February 9

DMK MP TR Baalu moved an Adjournment Motion notice in the Lok Sabha on Monday, seeking a discussion on the framework of the Bilateral Trade Agreement between India and the United States.

Submitting the notice, the DMK MP raised concerns about zero tariffs on certain agricultural products imported into India from the US.

"The reported draft Tariff and Trade agreement unilaterally announced by the USA is bound to open the floodgates of imports of Agricultural products into India. This will be disastrous for our farmers and farm sector," he wrote.

This comes as the framework for the trade deal states that India will eliminate or reduce tariffs on all US industrial goods and a wide range of US food and agricultural products, including dried distillers' grains (DDGs), red sorghum for animal feed, tree nuts, fresh and processed fruit, soybean oil, wine and spirits, and additional products.

However, the Centre has maintained that the interests of agriculture and other sensitive sectors have been safeguarded while drafting the framework for the deal.

Addressing the concern over the import of apples from the US, Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal clarified that the Centre has not "opened up" the market for US apples under the interim trade pact, but instead has given them a "quota" that is less than current apple imports, while fully protecting domestic apple growers.

Goyal stated that India has not opened its market to agricultural products that remain in surplus in the country. However, he said apples were not produced in surplus, noting that India produces 20-21 lakh tonnes of apples while demand is over 25-26 lakh tonnes.

"We are not surplus in apples. The demand for apples is more than 25-26 lakh tons. We produce about 20-21 lakh tons. As we speak, we import 5.5 lakh tons of apples every year. And a large quantity of that comes from the United States of America. We have not opened up apples. We have given them a quota on apples, which we will procure from there. That is less than the Current imports of apples from the USA," Goyal said in an interview with ANI.

The Union Minister assured that apple farmers in India will receive protection from import regulations that prevent cheap apples from flooding the market.

Meanwhile, the Parliament is scheduled to kickstart the discussion on Union Budget 2026-27, which was presented by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on February 1.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Minister Goyal's clarification on apples makes sense. If demand is higher than production, a controlled quota for imports is logical. But the worry is about other products. What about soy oil or nuts? Our local producers need protection too.
A
Aman W
Finally, a discussion in Parliament! These deals are often signed behind closed doors. The "framework" sounds very one-sided favoring US interests. We need a strong debate, not just assurances. Our sovereignty in trade policy is crucial.
S
Sarah B
As someone who follows international trade, this is a complex balancing act. India needs access to US markets for its goods and services too. A good deal can benefit both. But the devil is in the details—the fine print on agriculture is everything.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, I think the government is being cautious. The Commerce Minister has explained the apple quota clearly. We should trust our negotiators but also keep a watch. Blind opposition to every trade deal will not help India grow. Let's be pragmatic.
N
Nisha Z
My father is a farmer in Maharashtra. This news is very worrying for us. When foreign products come with subsidies, how can our small farmers compete? The government's "safeguard" promise must be in writing and legally binding. Jai Kisan! 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50