Peshawar High Court Questions Legality of Military Operation in Tirah Valley

The Peshawar High Court has sought clarification from federal and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governments regarding a military operation in Tirah Valley, which both governments deny approving. The petition, filed by Barrister Saud Javed Dawar, argues the operation is unconstitutional without provincial assembly approval under Article 232. Over 70,000 people have fled the remote region near Afghanistan due to the operation targeting the Pakistan Taliban. The federal government cites Article 245, arguing it empowers military deployment for internal security without a formal emergency proclamation.

Key Points: Pakistan Court Seeks Clarification on Tirah Military Operation

  • Court seeks government clarification
  • Operation linked to 70,000 displaced persons
  • Constitutional debate over Articles 232 & 245
  • Governments deny approving operation
  • Hearing adjourned to February 12
3 min read

Pakistan: Peshawar HC seeks clarification on military operation in Tirah Valley

Peshawar High Court hears petition challenging constitutionality of military operation in Tirah Valley, seeks government clarification and relief for IDPs.

"Deployment under Article 245 does not require a proclamation of emergency, a resolution of the provincial assembly or approval of either House of the Parliament. - Interior Secretary's reply"

Peshawar, January 31

The Peshawar High Court sought clarification from the federal and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governments regarding a military operation in Tirah Valley, reported Dawn.

On Friday, the governments denied approving the operation, with the KP Advocate General stating that no approval was given to the military.

The denial from both federal and provincial governments came before a bench of the Peshawar High Court (PHC) comprising Justice Wiqar Ahmad and Justice Mohammad Faheem Wali at the hearing of a petition filed by Barrister Saud Javed Dawar, a member of the National Democratic Movement (NDM).

The court has directed the Provincial Disaster Management Authority to provide relief to displaced people and summoned IDP representatives on Feb 12. The petitioner, Barrister Saud Javed Dawar, claims that the operation is unconstitutional because it lacks provincial assembly approval under Article 232.

Barrister Dawar who appeared along with his counsel Mohammad Yaseen Orakzai sought from the court multiple relief, including declaration that any 'order and action' of launching Tirah military operation was "unconstitutional, unlawful and violative of fundamental rights," reported Dawn.

The Peshawar High Court is examining the case, focusing on constitutional provisions (Articles 232 and 245) and relief for displaced persons.

The federal government cites Article 245, which empowers it to deploy the armed forces for internal security. The court will review the case, focusing on constitutional provisions and relief for displaced persons, reported Dawn.

A single-page reply from the interior secretary was also submitted to the court, stating that the deployment of the armed forces for internal security purposes was governed by Article 245, which empowers the federal government to employ the armed forces in aid of civil power.

"The Ministry of Interior and Narcotics Control has not initiated, directed, commanded or operationally supervised any such operation, nor has it issued any formal order, directive or requisition in this regard," the interior secretary added.

Without the passage of a resolution by the KP Assembly under Article 232 and Parliament's approval, the military operation couldn't be launched, the petitioner reminded the PHC.

The ministry explained that the constitutional framework clearly distinguishes between emergency powers under Article 232 and the deployment of forces under Article 245, Dawn reported.

"Deployment under Article 245 does not require a proclamation of emergency, a resolution of the provincial assembly or approval of either House of the Parliament.

"Matters concerning the protection, rehabilitation, repatriation, financial assistance, health, education, shelter and welfare of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) are primarily managed by the Provincial governments, NDMA, PDMA and other relevant civilian departments," the reply said.

Over 70,000 people, mostly women and children, have fled Tirah, a remote region in northwestern Pakistan near Afghanistan, in a military operation against the Pakistan Taliban. The exodus began after mosque loudspeakers urged residents to leave by January 23 to avoid potential fighting, Al Jazeera reported.

Military officials maintain they will continue targeted intelligence operations against Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). They claim many TTP fighters have found refuge in Afghanistan since the Afghan Taliban's 2021 return to power, with hundreds crossing into Tirah and using residents as human shields during raids.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Reading this from an Indian perspective, it's a stark reminder of how terrorism in our region creates instability and suffering for ordinary citizens. The legal debate about Article 232 vs 245 is interesting, but the real story is the human cost. Those families fleeing their homes... my heart goes out to them.
V
Vikram M
The government denying approval for an operation its own military is conducting? Sounds like a serious lack of coordination and transparency. If the operation is against TTP, it's necessary for regional security, but it must be done lawfully. The court seeking clarity is the right step. Chaos in our neighbourhood is never good for us.
P
Priya S
The most heartbreaking part is using mosque loudspeakers to tell people to leave. Imagine the fear. While the legal arguments go on in court, who is ensuring these displaced families have food, shelter, and safety? The PDMA needs to act swiftly. Humanitarian aid should be the top priority now.
R
Rohit P
This is a classic case of the establishment acting on its own. The military says it's continuing operations, the federal and provincial govts say they didn't approve it. The court is stuck in the middle. It shows where the real power lies. Not a stable situation for any country. 🇮🇳
K
Karthik V
A respectful criticism: The article focuses heavily on the legal and governmental aspects, which is important, but the sheer scale of human displacement deserves more emphasis. 70,000 people is not just a number. It's a tragedy. Hope the court's directive for relief is implemented properly and without delay.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50