Ex-Envoy: Pakistan Not "Honest Broker" in West Asia, Iran Lacks Trust

Former Indian Ambassador to Iran Dinkar Srivastava asserts that Iran does not trust Pakistan to mediate in West Asia, citing Pakistan's recent engagement with the US. He details Iran's rejection of a US peace proposal, describing the terms as unacceptable maximal demands in a situation of stalemate. Srivastava emphasizes that a diplomatic solution, including a ceasefire and multilateral talks, is the only viable path forward. He also warns of the conflict's severe economic impact, notably the sharp rise in global oil prices.

Key Points: Ex-Envoy Says Pakistan Not Trusted as West Asia Mediator

  • Iran distrusts Pakistan's US ties
  • US peace proposal rejected as "maximal"
  • Stalemate prevents imposed terms
  • Oil prices surge from conflict
  • Diplomacy only path forward
3 min read

"Pakistan not an honest broker" says former envoy to Iran Dinkar Srivastava on reports of Islamabad playing mediator in West Asia

Former Indian Ambassador to Iran Dinkar Srivastava says Iran does not see Pakistan as an honest broker for peace with the US and Israel.

"Iran could not have forgotten that... Pakistan is not an honest broker. - Dinkar Srivastava"

New Delhi, March 26

Even as US and Israel play a cat and mouse diplomatic game on a possible peace settlement, reports suggest that Islamabad may play broker between the two sides.

However, former Indian Ambassador to Iran Dinkar P Srivastava believes that Iran does not implicitly trust Pakistan as it has been cosying up to the US recently.

"Iran could not have forgotten that in June last year, when it was under Israeli attack, General Asim Munir was having lunch at the White House. So they clearly know that Pakistan is not an honest broker," the former envoy said.

The former envoy said that with Iran rejecting the 15-point proposal by the United States aimed at ending the war there appears to be a stalemate in West Asia. Iran, had called US' terms "maximal" and unacceptable.

"The US proposal has been rejected by Iran, which described them as containing maximal demands. The US has not won the war. It is a stalemate. And if it's a stalemate, you cannot expect to impose your terms," the former envoy said.

The proposal's inclusion of dismantling Iran's nuclear facilities and missile program, which was never part of previous deals, was a key point of contention. According to the Ambassador, Iran views its missile program as vital for its defence, especially in light of the ongoing conflict.

"This is the second war which is going on. That's the only, Iran's only defence," he remarked.

Regarding US claims that Iran is desperate for a deal, the former Ambassador dismissed them as "face-saving" rhetoric. He pointed out that if Iran were truly desperate, it would have been the first to initiate peace talks.

"If they were desperate, they wouldn't have rejected it. They would have been the first to initiate it," he stated.

On the potential for a diplomatic solution, the former Ambassador emphasised the need for a ceasefire and a multilateral approach. "Diplomatic solution is the only way forward. Immediate ceasefire, opening of the Persian Gulf and ceasing the attacks on Gulf countries which are non-belligerents," he stated.

He also suggested resuming diplomatic negotiations on the nuclear issue, ideally where talks left off in Geneva before the war.

The former Ambassador also touched upon the economic impact of the ongoing conflict, noting a sharp rise in oil prices. "Oil prices have already shot up, this is a much bigger shock than the second oil price shock," he warned, highlighting the broader consequences for the global economy.

When asked about Iran's message in allowing selected countries to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, he explained that it was a show of power.

"Iran is underlining the fact that despite taking very heavy military and civilian losses, it still has the capacity to control this strategic waterway," he said.

The former Ambassador reiterated that peace could only be achieved through diplomacy, but it would require significant trust-building and cooperation from all parties involved.

"These are things which can be worked out," he said, offering a glimmer of hope amidst the ongoing conflict.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The analysis about the economic impact is crucial for us in India. Rising oil prices will hit our pockets hard. We need stability in that region, not more posturing. Diplomacy is the only way, but it needs genuine actors, not those with conflicting loyalties.
V
Vikram M
Completely agree with the envoy. The US proposal asking Iran to dismantle its missile program was never going to work. It's their primary defence! You can't expect a country to surrender its security in the middle of a conflict. The stalemate will continue until there's realistic negotiation.
P
Priya S
While I respect the Ambassador's experience, I feel the tone is a bit one-sided. A lasting peace needs compromise from all sides, including Iran. Simply blaming the US or Pakistan won't solve it. We need to encourage dialogue from every angle. 🙏
R
Rohit P
The point about controlling the Strait of Hormuz is a powerful message from Iran. It shows they still have leverage. This whole situation is so complex. Hope diplomacy prevails before global oil markets crash and we end up paying ₹120 for a litre of petrol! 😓
K
Karthik V
Excellent insights. It's refreshing to hear a clear-eyed Indian perspective on global geopolitics. Pakistan's attempt to insert itself as a mediator is pure optics. Their credibility on the world stage, especially with neighbours, is near zero. India should use its good relations with key players to quietly push for a multilateral solution.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50