Iran Rejects Pakistan as Mediator in US Nuclear Talks

Senior Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaei has publicly rejected Pakistan's role as a mediator between Tehran and Washington, citing Islamabad's alignment with US interests. Rezaei stated that Pakistan "lacks the necessary credibility" and always takes Trump's interests into account. Despite this, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi continues shuttle diplomacy, visiting Pakistan, Oman, and Moscow. Iran has proposed a new diplomatic framework focusing on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and postponing nuclear negotiations.

Key Points: Iran Rejects Pakistan as Mediator in US Talks

  • Iran rejects Pakistan as mediator in US talks
  • Lawmaker cites Pakistan's alignment with Washington
  • Diplomatic efforts continue via Oman and Moscow
  • Iran proposes new framework for Strait of Hormuz
3 min read

Pakistan lacks "credibility" to mediate between Tehran and Washington, says senior Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaei

Senior Iranian lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaei says Pakistan lacks credibility to mediate between Tehran and Washington, citing alignment with US interests.

"Pakistan is a good friend and neighbour of ours, but it is not a suitable mediator for negotiations and lacks the necessary credibility. - Ebrahim Rezaei"

Tehran, April 27

As diplomatic efforts to secure a breakthrough between the United States and Iran continue, a senior Iranian lawmaker has raised significant concerns regarding Pakistan's role as a neutral intermediary.

Ebrahim Rezaei, the spokesperson for Iran's national security and foreign policy commission, suggested that Islamabad may be too aligned with Washington to serve as an effective go-between.

In a statement shared on X, the Dashtestan representative argued that "Pakistan is a good friend and neighbour of ours, but it is not a suitable mediator for negotiations and lacks the necessary credibility." He further alleged that Pakistani officials "always take Trump's interests into account and do not speak against the Americans' wishes," citing a perceived reluctance to challenge US diplomatic reversals.

Rezaei pointed to specific instances where he felt the mediation had been one-sided, claiming the intermediaries "do not say that the Americans had commitments regarding Lebanon or blocked assets but failed to honour them." Emphasising the need for a balanced approach, the MP noted that "a mediator must be impartial, not always leaning to one side."

These critical remarks come despite intensive shuttle diplomacy by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who recently visited Islamabad to sustain the momentum of the talks. During his mission, Araghchi engaged with Pakistan's Army Chief, General Asim Munir, along with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, to explore potential pathways towards resolving the regional conflict.

Before his arrival in Pakistan, Araghchi had held consultations in Oman with Sultan Haitham bin Tariq Al Said, focusing on maritime safety and broader diplomatic frameworks. Discussions have reportedly expanded beyond the traditional nuclear impasse to include a "new legal framework for the strait," as well as demands for compensation, security assurances, and the removal of US naval restrictions.

The Iranian Foreign Minister has since travelled to Moscow for further high-level talks, even as the pace of negotiations appears to be slowing. The diplomatic friction is underscored by a recent shift in Washington's stance, where President Donald Trump indicated that Iranian authorities "can initiate contact" if they seek to negotiate, following the cancellation of a proposed US delegation visit to Pakistan.

Despite the friction, following the cancellation of high-profile Islamabad peace talks by US President Donald Trump last week, "fresh signs" of diplomatic movement have surfaced.

Tehran has reportedly provided Washington with a "new proposal" aimed at the dual objectives to "reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war," according to a report by Axios, which cited a US official. As part of this diplomatic framework, Iran has also suggested a move to "postpone nuclear negotiations" until a subsequent phase of the peace process.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting how Iran is calling out Pakistan's bias. As an outsider, I've always seen Pakistan balancing between the US and China, but this shows even its neighbours doubt its neutrality. Good for India to have stable ties with both Iran and the US without such compromises.
V
Vikram M
Ebrahim Rezaei's statement is a diplomatic masterstroke—exposing Pakistan's hypocrisy without breaking ties. India should take notes: bilateral relations need clear red lines. And yes, Chabahar port remains crucial for us to bypass Pakistan entirely 😎
N
Nisha Z
Wait, so Iran wants Pakistan to mediate but also calls it biased? That's a bit contradictory, no? Either you trust your neighbour or you don't. But honestly, given Pakistan's record with terrorism and double standards, Iran's skepticism is understandable. India-Iran relations are much more reliable.
D
David E
Makes sense from an Iranian perspective—Pakistan has been too cozy with the US for decades, especially under Trump. But India has its own strategic interests here: we need stability in the Gulf for energy security and our diaspora. Let's hope Iran-US talks work, even if Pakistan isn't the best mediator 🇮🇳
K
Kavya N
Honestly, instead of relying on Pakistan or anyone else, India should step up as a global mediator. We have good ties with both Iran and the US. But maybe we're too busy with our own neighbourhood problems. Still, it's good see Iran openly calling out bias—transparency matters in diplomacy.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50