Pakistan's IMF Love-Hate Affair: Economic Lifeline or "Systematic Destruction"?

Pakistan is in a paradoxical relationship with the IMF, relying on its loans for survival while domestic critics accuse the institution's policies of causing severe economic harm. An article in The News International argues that IMF-prescribed reforms have led to skyrocketing energy costs, regressive taxation, and a dramatic contraction of the industrial sector. The consequences include hundreds of factory closures, a devastated textile industry, and a significant "brain drain" as talented youth emigrate. This deteriorating climate has triggered an exodus of major foreign companies, including Microsoft, signaling a profound loss of investment confidence.

Key Points: Pakistan's IMF Dilemma: Lifeline Loans vs. Economic Woes

  • IMF loans are a desperate lifeline
  • Critics blame IMF for de-industrialization and poverty
  • Hundreds of factories and textile mills have shut down
  • Major global firms like Microsoft are exiting Pakistan
3 min read

Pakistan caught in love-hate relation with IMF

Pakistan relies on IMF funds while media blames it for de-industrialization, factory closures, and a corporate exodus including Microsoft.

"Pakistan's long engagement with the IMF has produced a pattern of systematic destruction - The News International"

New Delhi, Jan 16

Pakistan appears to be caught in a love-hate relationship with the IMF. Although the crisis-ridden country is surviving through periodic transfusions of IMF funds, ironically, the multilateral institution is coming under heavy criticism in its media.

While the Government desperately seeks loans as a lifeline to save the struggling economy, there are former ministers who blame the IMF for the country's economic woes.

An article in The News International said: "Pakistan's long engagement with the IMF has produced a pattern of systematic destruction: in the name of stabilisation, fiscal consolidation and 'reform', Pakistan has been subjected to a policy mix that has dramatically raised energy costs, imposed highly regressive taxation, throttled industrial production, increased poverty and pushed the economy towards de-industrialisation."

The article states that the strategy for Pakistan's socio-economic development should have centred on strengthening education, science, technology, and innovation, enabling the country to move from a low-value, natural-resource-based economy to a high-value-added, technology-driven knowledge economy.

However, it claims that the "exact opposite has happened, which now poses a huge existential threat: our schools, colleges and universities lie in tatters, our exports have declined to about $30 billion after touching $35 billion, the poverty has increased substantially, and there has been a mass migration of talented youth and industrial groups to greener pastures abroad".

The article further stated that in the past five years, Pakistan's industrial landscape has experienced a dramatic contraction, with hundreds of local manufacturing units shutting down as a direct result of rising energy costs, heavy tax burdens, and pervasive policy uncertainty. Business leaders have claimed that more than 50 per cent of factories in major industrial zones have closed.

Regional data shows similar trends at the provincial level: in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa alone, about 795 industrial units are said to have closed in roughly six years, a significant proportion of which have ceased operations in the last half-decade due to unaffordable utility costs and waning investment confidence. The textile sector, Pakistan's traditional export engine, has been particularly devastated: industry sources estimate that at least 144 textile mills have shut down nationwide, while broader garment-sector closures have led to tens of thousands of jobs lost and declining export competitiveness.

The wave of corporate exits from Pakistan includes global names such as Microsoft, which is completely shutting down its Pakistan operations after 25 years, and companies including Careem, Shell, Telenor, Procter & Gamble and others that are either exiting or scaling back their presence amid currency volatility, inflationary pressures, and regulatory uncertainty. These departures signal a deteriorating investment climate in which both foreign and local enterprises find it increasingly difficult to plan long-term, secure capital and compete with regional rivals that benefit from more predictable policies and cost-competitive inputs, the article added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
It's sad to see the youth and industries leaving. The article is right about focusing on education and tech. We in India have seen the benefits of that push. Hope our neighbors find stability soon, for the sake of the common people. 🙏
R
Rohit P
Microsoft, Shell, P&G leaving... that says it all. When big global companies exit, it's a major red flag for any economy. Investment needs policy certainty, which seems completely absent. Contrast this with the FDI flowing into India.
S
Sarah B
While the criticism of IMF conditions is understandable, the "love-hate" dynamic is a result of not having a sustainable economic plan. You can't keep taking loans without fixing the structural issues. The focus should have been on building export competitiveness, not just seeking bailouts.
V
Vikram M
The textile sector collapse is huge. They were once a major competitor. Now, with units shutting down, it creates an opportunity for Indian textiles, but overall regional instability isn't good for business. Hope they get back on track.
K
Kavya N
It's the ordinary citizen who suffers the most—increased poverty, lost jobs, soaring costs. The political leadership there needs to own responsibility instead of just pointing fingers at the IMF. Tough reforms are painful but necessary for long-term health.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50