Pakistan's Industry Questions Energy Relief as Fuel Costs Wipe Out Gains

Pakistan's business community is challenging the government's assertion that its energy tariff incentive package has provided meaningful relief to industry. Official figures show nearly half of industrial consumers received benefits totaling over Rs 12 billion in two months. However, industry leaders argue the relief mainly aided smaller or inactive units, while larger, grid-stable industries saw little advantage. They contend that rising fuel costs and quarterly adjustments have effectively canceled out much of the announced reduction, creating planning uncertainty.

Key Points: Pakistan Business Doubts Gov't Energy Tariff Package Impact

  • 46% of industrial consumers used relief package
  • Rs 12.125 billion relief in two months
  • Business says large industries saw little benefit
  • Rising fuel costs erased announced reductions
  • Tariff rebasing volatility hurts export planning
2 min read

Pakistan: Business community questions impact of government's energy tariff package

Pakistan's business community disputes gov't claims on energy tariff relief, arguing fuel cost adjustments have neutralized benefits for major industries.

"more than half of the promised relief had been neutralised within the same billing cycle - Atif Ikram Shaikh"

Islamabad, February 21

Pakistan's business community has cast serious doubt on the government's claims that its energy tariff incentive package has delivered meaningful relief to industry, despite official figures suggesting widespread benefit. The Power Division reported that 127,686 industrial consumers availed themselves of the scheme in December 2025 and January 2026, receiving a combined relief of Rs 12.125 billion. This represents 46 per cent of the country's 278,961 industrial electricity consumers, as reported by Dawn.

The package includes a three-year incremental plan featuring a Rs4.04 per unit reduction for industry and a shift in tariff rebasing from a fiscal year to a calendar year cycle starting January 1, 2026. The government maintains that both small and large industries received a benefit of Rs 10.3 per unit on surplus electricity consumption, Dawn reported. However, industrial representatives dispute these claims. They argue that the relief primarily benefited inactive or limited-scale units, while larger B3 and B4 category industries, which contribute no losses to the grid but pay higher tariffs, saw little real advantage. Business leaders also contend that rising fuel costs and quarterly adjustments have effectively wiped out much of the announced reduction.

1,176 million units of electricity were sold under the surplus package in the two-month period, accounting for nearly 24 per cent of total industrial consumption. December saw 557 million units sold under the scheme, providing Rs5.743 billion in relief, while January recorded 619 million units and Rs6.382 billion in benefits. Yet the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has warned that the fuel cost adjustment (FCA) for January alone increased charges by Rs1.78 per unit, with another Rs0.40 per unit expected under quarterly revisions, as highlighted by Dawn.

FPCCI President Atif Ikram Shaikh stated that more than half of the promised relief had been neutralised within the same billing cycle. Industry leaders further criticised repeated tariff rebasing in July 2025 and January 2026, arguing that such volatility undermines planning certainty and export competitiveness, despite official assurances from Power Minister Sardar Awais Ahmad Khan Leghari of continued oversight and reform, as reported by Dawn.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Interesting to see this from a neighbour's perspective. It highlights a common South Asian problem: policy implementation. The figures look good on paper (46% of consumers!), but if the active, large industries didn't feel the benefit, what's the point? Export competitiveness suffers everywhere with such volatility.
A
Aman W
Rs 12 billion relief sounds massive, but the FPCCI president saying half was neutralised in the *same* billing cycle is telling. It's like giving with one hand and taking back with the other. This uncertainty is a killer for business planning, whether in Pakistan or here.
S
Sarah B
Reading this from an economic development angle. If the B3/B4 industries (the ones presumably driving growth and employment) see little advantage, the package fails its core objective. The focus should be on creating a predictable cost environment. A lesson for all governments.
K
Karthik V
The business community's skepticism is valid. When you have quarterly revisions and fuel cost adjustments right after announcing a cut, it feels disingenuous. Hope our policymakers are taking notes. Stable energy tariffs are crucial for 'Make in India' to truly succeed. 🔌
N
Nisha Z
A three-year incremental plan sounds good in theory, but repeated tariff rebasing in just six months (July '25 & Jan '26) shows a lack of commitment. How can any industry, small or large, plan for the future with such shifting goalposts? The issue is governance, not just economics.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50